|




|
USCIS Releases
Helpful Information on Filing FY 2009 H-1B Cap Cases
In anticipation of the imminent filing of
thousands of petitions for new H-1B non-immigrant visas for
Fiscal Year (FY) 2009, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration
Services (USCIS) released a series of FAQs titled “Helpful
Information for Completing and Submitting a FY 2009 H-1B Cap
Case.” The FAQ document is available to the public on the
Internet at the following link:
http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/Q_and_A_H1B.pdf
Topics cover the basics of filing a FY 2009 H-1B
petition, including:
-
when and where to file an H-1B
petition
-
suggestions on how to structure an
H-1B filing
-
recommendations on ensuring an H-1B
filing is not rejected, including common errors
Shortly after releasing the FAQ document,
the USCIS spoke with the liaison committee of the American
Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA) and offered further,
more advanced advice concerning FY 2009 H-1B filings. The
liaison committee’s questions included:
“Should Premium Processing be used for
cap-subject filings?”
The USCIS advised that it should be anticipated that the
H-1B quotas will be filled as quickly, if not more quickly,
than last fiscal year. (For FY 2008, the 65,000 annual quota
was exceeded in just the first day of filing; the 20,000
set-aside for those with advanced degrees from a U.S.
college or university was filled within 30 days.)
Accordingly, Premium Processing Service may be suspended
temporarily as it was for a short time in FY 2008.
Thus, even if one requests Premium Processing Service with
an FY 2009 H-1B petition filed on April 1, 2008, it is not
guaranteed that immediate e-mail notification of the case
number will be received, nor can they guarantee that such
petitions will be adjudicated within 15 calendar days of
filing per usual Premium Processing procedures.
“Can a petitioner file duplicate H-1B filings to increase
chances of obtaining a cap number?”
The USCIS revealed that they are currently drafting a
regulation that will prohibit the practice of filing
duplicate petitions for the same beneficiary employee. In FY
2008, there was anecdotal evidence that a number of
beneficiaries had multiple duplicate petitions filed on
their behalf in order to increase their chances of being
selected in the random lottery. The CIS has indicated that
they are instituting measures to stop this practice, which
prejudices those without the resources to file multiple
copies of the same petition.
The definition of a duplicate petition will be described in
the proposed regulation. AILA has taken the position that a
petition filed under both the regular and the U.S. Master’s
caps would not be considered a duplicate, but acknowledged
that this could not be confirmed as correct without the
release of the regulation.
Changes in
Passport Options, Fees and Regulations
Beginning Feb. 1, 2008, the Department of State will
institute a new fee schedule for passport services.
Passport fees are being adjusted to cover the cost
of providing efficient and secure passport services
including infrastructure, technology and staff. The
Passport Execution fee collected by passport
acceptance centers and U.S. consular sections abroad
is being reduced from $30 to $25.
|
|
Current Passport Application Fee |
Current Execution Fee |
Current Total Fee |
New Passport Application Fee |
New Execution Fee |
New Total Fee |
|
Passport Book Adult |
$67
|
$30
|
$97
|
$75
|
$25
|
$100
|
|
Passport Book Child |
$52
|
$30
|
$82
|
$60
|
$25
|
$85
|
|
Passport Card Adult |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
$20
|
$25
|
$45
|
|
Passport Card Child |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
$10
|
$25
|
$35
|
|
Adult Passport Renewal |
$67
|
N/A |
$67
|
$75
|
N/A |
$75
|
Additionally, at this time applicants
will also have the option of pre-ordering a new Passport
Card. The card will be provided for limited use (land and
sea only) at a low cost. The Passport Card is an alternative
to the Passport Book designed for those living along the
border.
In addition, on the passport application the age for which
both parents must appear and sign on behalf of a child will
increase from 14 to 16 years old.
New application forms and updated information on applying
for a Passport and Passport Card will be available Feb. 1 at
http://travel.state.gov/passport.
Updated Filing Location for
H-1B Cap Exempt Petitions In
order to make the adjudication of H-1B Cap Exempt petitions
more efficient, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration
Services (USCIS) will utilize a special unit to process only
these types of petitions. Those in the cap exempt category
are identified as educational, nonprofit, or government
organizations. More specifically, institutions of higher
education, nonprofit organizations or entities related to or
affiliated with institutions of higher education, and
nonprofit research organizations or governmental research
organizations.
The USCIS has designated the California Service Center (CSC)
to receive these petitions. Petitioners are asked to
indicate that the case is exempt on the outside of the
envelope and the top margin of the I-129 form, by marking
“EXEMPT.” This will make certain that the employees at the
CSC will identify the petitions as exempt. If a cap exempt
H-1B petition is sent to the wrong Service Center, that
Service Center will immediately send the petition to the CSC
for processing.
H-1B Cap Exempt petitions will be sent to the California
Service Center in Laguna Nigel, CA. They have provided one
address for direct mail and one for private carriers.
Visa Bulletin Reveals Leaps Forward for
Employment-Based Preference Immigration Categories
The March 2008 Visa Bulletin published by the
U.S. Department of State (DOS) shows significant
leaps forward in the priority dates for all
retrogressed employment-based preference immigration
categories. The greatest benefit goes to foreign
nationals born in all chargeability areas (except
for China (mainland), India and Mexico) that are in
the third preference (EB-3) category, where priority
dates leapt from November 1, 2002 to January 1,
2005. (The second preference (EB-2) category for
Indian nationals remains unavailable.)
The forward movement comes after months of little to
no movement due to concerns of excessive demand. The
DOS has apparently changed its position, now
reporting that its intent is to avoid a situation
similar to last fiscal year’s situation, where large
amounts of immigrant visa numbers were available
towards the end of the fiscal year without
sufficient time to use them. This led to the
well-known July 2007 Visa Bulletin situation which
culminated in all employment-based immigrant visa
categories becoming current.
Forward movement may continue in the next few months
if the level of demand is not higher than expected.
However, it should be assumed that retrogression
(the backward movement of priority dates) will be
required by the summer or fall of 2008. We advise
that one takes advantage of this new momentum and be
prepared to file Form I-485 (Application to Register
Permanent Residence or to Adjust Status) on March 1,
2008, or as soon thereafter as possible.
EMPLOYMENT-BASED VISA BULLETIN FOR MARCH 2008
|
|
All chargeability
areas except those listed |
China - mainland born |
India |
Mexico |
Philippines |
|
1st |
C |
C |
C |
C |
C |
|
2nd |
C |
1-Dec-03 |
U |
C |
C |
|
3rd |
1-Jan-05 |
1-Dec-02 |
1-Aug-01 |
1-May-01 |
1-Jan-05 |
|
Other Workers |
1-Jan-02 |
1-Jan-02 |
1-Jan-02 |
1-Jan-02 |
1-Jan-02 |
For additional information, please post a question
in your online account folder or contact us at
customersupport@visanow.com.
Case Delays:
Causes, Consequences, and Solutions
On Jan. 17, 2008, Emilio T. Gonzalez, Director of
the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS),
discussed how they are managing the dramatic increase in
applications and petitions received in the summer of 2007.
In June, July and August over three million immigration
benefit applications and petitions of all types were
received, compared to 1.8 million applications and petitions
received in the same period the previous year. In Fiscal
Year 2007, USCIS received nearly 1.4 million applications
for naturalization, nearly double the volume received the
fiscal year before.
To date, what has the USCIS have done to accommodate such
jump in workload?
-
Their first priority was to accept filings and
provide applicants with proper receipt notices as
quickly and efficiently as possible. In an average
month, USCIS receipts are about 530,000. To accommodate
the three million applications and petitions received in
June, July, and August which exceeded their capacity,
USCIS has expanded work hours, added shifts, and
detailed 84 staff to its Service Centers.
-
In addition, the USCIS has begun hiring 1,500 new
employees of which 723 are adjudicators. To date, USCIS
has hired more than 580 permanent staff including more
than 274 adjudicators.
In the future, USCIS plans to transform the agency from a
paper-based environment to an electronic environment. In
Fiscal Year 2008, USCIS plans to expand on the Systems
Qualified Adjudication process, an automated process for
certain application where individuals are already qualified
and in the USCIS database. These will include, for example,
replacement of an expired permanent resident card or
temporary employment authorization. Other technology
enhancements include improving the background check process
and the capability to produce system-generated
Naturalization Certificates. USCIS will also adjust some
administrative procedures to streamline naturalization
process.
With respect to resources, USCIS plans to utilize and spend
over two years worth of fee revenue generated by surge
applications estimated at $450 million and $480 million.
Unfortunately, due to such significant changes that will be
made to their staffing, technology and process, USCIS
expects that people may wait longer to have their
applications completed for the next couple years.
USCIS Revises Security Check Policy
The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration
Services (USCIS) released a new memo changing their
security check guidelines. An FBI and Interagency
Border Inspection Services (IBIS) name check must be
obtained and cleared before an I-485 Application for
Adjustment of Status can be approved. The USCIS has
no control over the speed of these name checks, but
many I-485 cases have been pending for several years
due to the slowness of the process. The USCIS has
stated that where the I-485 application is otherwise
approvable and the name check has been pending for
over 180 days, the I-485 will be approved, and the
green card will be issued. The FBI has committed to
finishing the security check within this time frame.
The USCIS will be issuing a Q&A regarding their new
security check policy, which should be available on
their website in the next few days.
H-2B “Returning Worker” Issues Explained
Employers seeking to file H-2B petitions for the
upcoming fiscal year are facing a very different
situation than they have for filings made in the
past several years. Recent events have changed the
landscape of the H-2B process, making filing a more
arduous task than it has been in recent years.
H-2B visas for employees engaging in temporary
non-agricultural labor are, and have been, subject
to a numerical cap of 66,000 per fiscal year. In
2005, President Bush signed into law the Save Our
Small And Seasonal Business Act. This act had the
effect of exempting from the annual cap any
“returning worker”. Returning workers are defined as
those who have been counted under the cap (i.e. –
subjected to the cap) in any of the three preceding
fiscal years. This legislation benefited both H-2B
workers and their employers by ensuring available
visas for H-2B employees already counted under the
cap and leaving additional space under the cap for
new H-2B workers. Since the Act went into effect, it
has been a required that Congress extend the
“returning worker” provision each year, exempting
such workers from the cap on an annual basis.
However, the most recent extension of this provision
did not occur. As such, the effective period of the
“returning worker” provision expired on Sept. 30,
2007. As such the provision is no longer in effect.
This means that workers who have previously been
subjected to and counted under the cap are no longer
cap-immune. This has an adverse effect on the H-2B
labor force. As returning workers are now subject to
the annual numerical cap, returning workers face
uncertainty in their efforts to obtain H-2B work
authorizations for the upcoming fiscal year.
Further, counting returning workers against the
numerical cap will drastically reduce the number of
new H-2B visas available to employees who have not
previously been subjected to the cap.
Efforts to further extend the returning worker
provisions are ongoing. Those in favor of the
extension are calling on employers to urge
politicians to take the necessary steps to revive
the exemption, allowing for a larger and stronger
H-2B labor force to support small American
businesses.
|