<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel xmlns:blog="http://www.dotnetnuke.com/blog/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/">
    <title>Global Immigration Blog</title>
    <description>Subscribe to VISANOW's Blog and learn the latest news relating to Immigration Law and Policies.
</description>
    <link>http://www.visanow.com/blog/BlogId/5.aspx</link>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <webMaster />
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 00:39:50 GMT</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 00:39:50 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
    <generator>Blog RSS Generator Version 4.0.0.0</generator>
    <item>
      <title>Call it the Law of Unintended Consequences </title>
      <link>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/467/Call-it-the-Law-of-Unintended-Consequences.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;The state of Alabama boasts the nation’s toughest immigration law. Known as HB-56, the Hammon-Beason Alabama Taxpayer and Citizen Protection Act requires law enforcement officers to ascertain an individual’s legal status during a police stop if an officer has reason to suspect the person may be unlawfully present in the United States.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;Honda Motor Company executive Ichiro Yada wasn’t in the country illegally as he drove through Leeds, Alabama in late 2011. Honda’s manufacturing plant in nearby Lincoln covers 1,350 acres, boasts a capacity of 300,000 vehicles and engines per year, and contributes to the state’s strong automotive sector, which currently ranks fifth in the nation in car manufacturing. When Ichiro was questioned as he passed through a routine traffic stop, he produced a passport and a valid U.S. work permit. It wasn’t enough. Although Ichiro’s case was eventually dismissed, the incident marked the second time a visiting automotive executive was detained due to Alabama's tough new immigration law. Just weeks earlier, a German Mercedes-Benz worker was arrested in Tuscaloosa after being unable to produce proper immigration documentation.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;Although supporters of the law aim to drive illegal immigrants out of the state, it could be Alabama businesses that pack their bags for greener pastures. Neighboring Missouri, in fact, hopes to capitalize on companies feeling the heat from HB-56. In a recent editorial, the St. Louis Post-Dispatch reminded readers that Missouri is the “Show-Me State, not the ‘Show me your papers’ state.”&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;Alabama governor Robert J. Bentley did not address the controversial law, which went into effect last June, during his State of the State Address on February 7. Defending the omission, Gov. Bentley said, "Basically I've already said what we need to say on the illegal immigration law.”&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;However, some state legislators have a lot to say on the subject. Proposed options for addressing the situation range from tweaking the bill to outright repealing it. In addition to requiring law enforcement officers to ascertain legal status during routine questionings, the bill also includes measures to prevent illegal immigrants from engaging in business transactions with the state. This means obtaining electric and water service can require a customer to submit proof of legal status. The same goes for aid programs like food stamps; the Southern Poverty Law Center reports that some families have already been denied assistance due to the new requirements.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;HB-56 also originally required officials at primary and secondary schools to document the legal status of attending students, but that provision was struck down by the U.S. Court of Appeals. However, the Court's decision left other controversial portions of the law intact, setting the stage for what may be an eventual Supreme Court showdown. &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Jason Davis&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Systems Administrator&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/467/Call-it-the-Law-of-Unintended-Consequences.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/467/Call-it-the-Law-of-Unintended-Consequences.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/467/Call-it-the-Law-of-Unintended-Consequences.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 16:07:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=467</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Roses are red, violets are blue, if your wedding is fake, no visa for you!</title>
      <link>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/466/Roses-are-red-violets-are-blue-if-your-wedding-is-fake-no-visa-for-you.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt="" style="width: 156px; height: 108px" src="http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Money/Pix/pictures/2008/07/10/divorce460.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The U.K. Border Agency has recently teamed up with local registrars and parishes to put a halt to the issuing of illegal visas through sham weddings. Over the past month, the agency has found and stopped over 70 weddings by simply monitoring the answers provided during interviews at the registrar's office. With this new "excellent" teaming, the agency has found itself actually walking into chapels and ceremonies, preserving justice just before the "I do's".&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;The Border Agency staff spent a month interviewing all brides and grooms at the registrar's office, cataloging answers and determining red flags. Detective Inspector Adrian Watkins stated: "Since we started looking at these last March, there's been an increase and they've been brought to our attention on a more regular basis, probably because the registrars themselves are more aware of the problem… We've done a lot of work leading up to the operation, intelligence work. We've also got excellent co-operation with the registrars."&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;Local parishes have also been lending a hand, reporting suspicious couples to the U.K. Border Agency. Canon Tony Bundock, rector of the Leeds Parish Church reported that, "because of some of the abuses that did take place a few years ago, we're now required to check that the address that they've given us is genuine by actually visiting them, going to both houses, both the bride and the groom." Through doing this, they've been able to nab multiple couples in fraudulent relationships and put a stop to their illegal marriages. With the U.K. making it a national goal to significantly reduce immigration numbers from hundreds of thousands to tens of thousands a year, we can expect many more stringent practices and the tightening of regulations.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Happy Valentine's Day!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Omer Abbas Salem&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Customer Support Specialist&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/466/Roses-are-red-violets-are-blue-if-your-wedding-is-fake-no-visa-for-you.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/466/Roses-are-red-violets-are-blue-if-your-wedding-is-fake-no-visa-for-you.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/466/Roses-are-red-violets-are-blue-if-your-wedding-is-fake-no-visa-for-you.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:54:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=466</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>March 2012 Visa Bulletin</title>
      <link>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/465/March-2012-Visa-Bulletin.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 12pt"&gt;The USCIS continues with their progressive trend and this month still shows advancements in almost every employment-based and family-based immigration category.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 12pt"&gt;The F-1 category, unmarried children over 21 of permanent residents, has advanced rather dramatically, with China, India, and all skating ahead two months and Mexico and the Philippines advancing one month.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 12pt"&gt;The F-2A category, spouses and unmarried children under 21 of lawful permanent residents, exhibits progress across the board with China, India, Philippines, and all other areas scooting one month forward to 07/22/2009, while Mexico pushes against the wind and moves forward two months to 07/01/2009.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 12pt"&gt;In the F-2B category, or unmarried children 21 years or older of permanent residents, China, India, and all other areas continue to forge ahead one month to 11/15/2003. The Philippines follows suit and progresses one month to 12/01/2001, while Mexico remains stagnant at 12/01/1992.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 12pt"&gt;The F-3 category, married sons and daughters of permanent residents, urges itself forward. Each category advanced one month, bringing China, India, and all other areas to 01/01/2002; Mexico to 01/08/1993; and the Philippines to 07/22/1992. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 12pt"&gt;Encouragingly, February’s Visa Bulletin for employment-based immigration depicts similar progressions. Unsurprisingly, the EB-1 category continues to remain current. The EB-2 category seems to be the star pupil, keeping Mexico, Philippines, and all other areas current while China and India leap forward five months to 05/01/2010. The EB-3 category shows more modest progress, sliding each category forward a month. The “Other Worker” category copies the EB-3’s, moving each area forward a month except for China, which stays at 04/22/2003. All other categories remain current.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 12pt"&gt;Employment-Based Visa Bulletin for February:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="525" style="width: 393.8pt"&gt;
    &lt;tbody&gt;
        &lt;tr&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Employment- Based&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td sizcache="29" sizset="156" style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div sizcache="29" sizset="157" style="line-height: 15pt; margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style="color: #404040; font-size: 9pt"&gt;All Chargeability Areas Except Those Listed&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td sizcache="29" sizset="158" style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;CHINA- mainland born&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td sizcache="29" sizset="159" style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;INDIA&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td sizcache="29" sizset="160" style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;MEXICO&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td sizcache="29" sizset="161" style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;PHILIPPINES&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
        &lt;/tr&gt;
        &lt;tr style="height: 15pt"&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; height: 15pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;1st&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; height: 15pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;C&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; height: 15pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;C&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; height: 15pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;C&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; height: 15pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;C&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; height: 15pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;C&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
        &lt;/tr&gt;
        &lt;tr style="height: 15pt"&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; height: 15pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;2nd&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td width="100" style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; width: 75.2pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; height: 15pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;C&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td width="71" style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; width: 53.2pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; height: 15pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #ff0000"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;01MAY10&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td width="73" style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; width: 54.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; height: 15pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #ff0000"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;01MAY10&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td width="74" style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; width: 55.2pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; height: 15pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;C&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td width="108" style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; width: 81.2pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; height: 15pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;C&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
        &lt;/tr&gt;
        &lt;tr style="height: 15pt"&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; height: 15pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;3rd&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; height: 15pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #ff0000"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;15MAR06&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; height: 15pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #ff0000"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;01JAN05&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; height: 15pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #ff0000"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;22AUG02&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; height: 15pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #ff0000"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;15MAR06&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; height: 15pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #ff0000"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;15MAR06&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
        &lt;/tr&gt;
        &lt;tr style="height: 15pt"&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; height: 15pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;Other Workers&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; height: 15pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #ff0000"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;15MAR06&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; height: 15pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;22APR03&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; height: 15pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #ff0000"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;22AUG02&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; height: 15pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #ff0000"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;15MAR06&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; height: 15pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #ff0000"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;15MAR06&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
        &lt;/tr&gt;
        &lt;tr style="height: 15pt"&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; height: 15pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;4th&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; height: 15pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;C&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; height: 15pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;C&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; height: 15pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;C&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; height: 15pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;C&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; height: 15pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;C&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
        &lt;/tr&gt;
        &lt;tr style="height: 15pt"&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; height: 15pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;Certain Religious Workers&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; height: 15pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;C&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; height: 15pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;C&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; height: 15pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;C&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; height: 15pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;C&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; height: 15pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;C&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
        &lt;/tr&gt;
        &lt;tr style="height: 15pt"&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; height: 15pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: 15pt; margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #404040; font-size: 9pt"&gt;5th&lt;br /&gt;
            &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="color: #404040; font-size: 9pt"&gt;&lt;span sizcache="29" sizset="171"&gt;Targeted&lt;br /&gt;
            Employment&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="color: #404040; font-size: 9pt"&gt; Areas/&lt;br /&gt;
            Regional Centers&lt;br /&gt;
            and &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="color: #404040; font-size: 9pt"&gt;Pilot Programs&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; height: 15pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;C&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; height: 15pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;C&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; height: 15pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;C&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; height: 15pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;C&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; height: 15pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;C&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
        &lt;/tr&gt;
    &lt;/tbody&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style="color: #404040; font-size: 12pt"&gt;Legend&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="line-height: normal; text-indent: -0.25in; margin: 0in 0in 0pt 1in"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #404040; font-size: 12pt"&gt;·&lt;span style="font: 7pt 'Times New Roman'"&gt;         &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="color: #404040; font-size: 12pt"&gt;C = current as there is no waiting period necessary to file for permanent residency&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="line-height: normal; text-indent: -0.25in; margin: 0in 0in 0pt 1in"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #404040; font-size: 12pt"&gt;·&lt;span style="font: 7pt 'Times New Roman'"&gt;         &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="color: #404040; font-size: 12pt"&gt;U = unavailable as visa supply has been exhausted for the remainder of fiscal year, or legislation creating the category has expired&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="line-height: normal; text-indent: -0.25in; margin: 0in 0in 10pt 1in"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #404040; font-size: 12pt"&gt;·&lt;span style="font: 7pt 'Times New Roman'"&gt;         &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="color: #404040; font-size: 12pt"&gt;Date indicated = cut-off date that indicates a backlog; if the priority date (date the labor certification or I-140 was filed, depending on the type of case) is BEFORE the date listed, one may apply for permanent residency&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #404040; font-size: 12pt"&gt;Employment-Based Preferences&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="line-height: normal; text-indent: -0.25in; margin: 0in 0in 0pt 1in"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #404040; font-size: 12pt"&gt;·&lt;span style="font: 7pt 'Times New Roman'"&gt;         &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="color: #404040; font-size: 12pt"&gt;First: Priority Workers&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="line-height: normal; text-indent: -0.25in; margin: 0in 0in 0pt 1in"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #404040; font-size: 12pt"&gt;·&lt;span style="font: 7pt 'Times New Roman'"&gt;         &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="color: #404040; font-size: 12pt"&gt;Second: Members of the Professions Holding Advanced Degrees or Persons of Exceptional Ability&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="line-height: normal; text-indent: -0.25in; margin: 0in 0in 0pt 1in"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #404040; font-size: 12pt"&gt;·&lt;span style="font: 7pt 'Times New Roman'"&gt;         &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="color: #404040; font-size: 12pt"&gt;Third: Skilled Workers, Professionals, and Other Workers&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="line-height: normal; text-indent: -0.25in; margin: 0in 0in 0pt 1in"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #404040; font-size: 12pt"&gt;·&lt;span style="font: 7pt 'Times New Roman'"&gt;         &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="color: #404040; font-size: 12pt"&gt;Fourth: Certain Special Immigrants&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="line-height: normal; text-indent: -0.25in; margin: 0in 0in 10pt 1in"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 12pt"&gt;·&lt;span style="font: 7pt 'Times New Roman'"&gt;         &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="color: #404040; font-size: 12pt"&gt;Fifth: Employment Creation&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 12pt"&gt;Family-based Visa Bulletin for February:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="424" style="width: 318pt"&gt;
    &lt;tbody&gt;
        &lt;tr&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 12pt"&gt;Family-Sponsored&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 12pt"&gt;All Chargeability Areas Except Those Listed&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 12pt"&gt;CHINA-mainland born&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 12pt"&gt;INDIA&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 12pt"&gt;MEXICO&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 12pt"&gt;PHILIPPINES&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
        &lt;/tr&gt;
        &lt;tr&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 12pt"&gt;F1&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #ff0000"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 12pt"&gt;01FEB05&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #ff0000"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 12pt"&gt;01FEB05&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #ff0000"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 12pt"&gt;01FEB05&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #ff0000"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 12pt"&gt;01MAY93&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #ff0000"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 12pt"&gt;22JUN97&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
        &lt;/tr&gt;
        &lt;tr&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 12pt"&gt;F2A&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #ff0000"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 12pt"&gt;22JUL09&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #ff0000"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 12pt"&gt;22JUL09&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #ff0000"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 12pt"&gt;22JUL09&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #ff0000"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 12pt"&gt;01JUL09 &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #ff0000"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 12pt"&gt;22JUL09&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
        &lt;/tr&gt;
        &lt;tr&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 12pt"&gt;F2B&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #ff0000"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 12pt"&gt;15NOV03&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #ff0000"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 12pt"&gt;15NOV03&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #ff0000"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 12pt"&gt;15NOV03&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 12pt"&gt;01DEC92&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #ff0000"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 12pt"&gt;08DEC01&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
        &lt;/tr&gt;
        &lt;tr&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 12pt"&gt;F3&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #ff0000"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 12pt"&gt;01JAN02&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #ff0000"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 12pt"&gt;01JAN02&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #ff0000"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 12pt"&gt;01JAN02&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #ff0000"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 12pt"&gt;08JAN93&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #ff0000"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 12pt"&gt;22JUL92&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
        &lt;/tr&gt;
        &lt;tr&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 12pt"&gt;F4&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 12pt"&gt;08OCT00&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 12pt"&gt;08OCT00&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 12pt"&gt;08OCT00&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 12pt"&gt;22MAY96&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 12pt"&gt;22DEC88&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
        &lt;/tr&gt;
    &lt;/tbody&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style="color: #404040; font-size: 12pt"&gt;Legend&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="line-height: normal; text-indent: -0.25in; margin: auto auto auto 1in"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #404040; font-size: 12pt"&gt;·&lt;span style="font: 7pt 'Times New Roman'"&gt;         &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="color: #404040; font-size: 12pt"&gt;C = current as there is no waiting period necessary to file for permanent residency&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="line-height: normal; text-indent: -0.25in; margin: auto auto auto 1in"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #404040; font-size: 12pt"&gt;·&lt;span style="font: 7pt 'Times New Roman'"&gt;         &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="color: #404040; font-size: 12pt"&gt;U = unavailable as visa supply has been exhausted for the remainder of fiscal year, or legislation creating the category has expired&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="line-height: normal; text-indent: -0.25in; margin: auto auto auto 1in"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #404040; font-size: 12pt"&gt;·&lt;span style="font: 7pt 'Times New Roman'"&gt;         &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="color: #404040; font-size: 12pt"&gt;Date indicated = cut-off date that indicates a backlog; if the priority date (date the I-130 was filed) is BEFORE the date listed, one may apply for permanent residency&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: auto auto auto 1in"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #404040; font-size: 12pt"&gt;Family-Based Preferences&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="line-height: normal; text-indent: -0.25in; margin: auto auto auto 1in"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #404040; font-size: 12pt"&gt;·&lt;span style="font: 7pt 'Times New Roman'"&gt;         &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="color: #404040; font-size: 12pt"&gt;First: Unmarried sons and daughters (i.e., children over 21 years of age) of U.S. citizens&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="line-height: normal; text-indent: -0.25in; margin: auto auto auto 1in"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #404040; font-size: 12pt"&gt;·&lt;span style="font: 7pt 'Times New Roman'"&gt;         &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="color: #404040; font-size: 12pt"&gt;2A: Spouses and children (i.e., unmarried children under 21 years of age) of lawful permanent residents&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="line-height: normal; text-indent: -0.25in; margin: auto auto auto 1in"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #404040; font-size: 12pt"&gt;·&lt;span style="font: 7pt 'Times New Roman'"&gt;         &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="color: #404040; font-size: 12pt"&gt;2B: Unmarried sons and daughters (i.e., children over 21 years of age) of lawful permanent residents&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="line-height: normal; text-indent: -0.25in; margin: auto auto auto 1in"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #404040; font-size: 12pt"&gt;·&lt;span style="font: 7pt 'Times New Roman'"&gt;         &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="color: #404040; font-size: 12pt"&gt;Third: Married sons and daughters of U.S. citizens&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="text-indent: -0.25in; margin: 0in 0in 10pt 1in"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 12pt"&gt;·&lt;span style="font: 7pt 'Times New Roman'"&gt;         &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="line-height: 115%; color: #404040; font-size: 12pt"&gt;Fourth: Brothers and sisters of U.S. citizens&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/465/March-2012-Visa-Bulletin.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/465/March-2012-Visa-Bulletin.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/465/March-2012-Visa-Bulletin.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:47:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=465</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Where is Comprehensive Immigration Reform?</title>
      <link>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/464/Where-is-Comprehensive-Immigration-Reform.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Where is Comprehensive Immigration Reform? How about starting with the Dream Act?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt; &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="text-align: justify; margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;When President Obama was campaigning for office, he was able to attract many voters, the Latino vote in particular, by promising immigration reform. Throughout his presidency he has supported the idea that immigration reform is a necessary step in, “fixing our broken immigration system.” Rather than trying to force anti-immigration sentiment to take too big a bite of the apple, the President has focused efforts on what should be a less polarizing issue: the legalization of children. I mean, who doesn’t want to help and protect children?&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="text-align: justify; margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;In this year’s State of the Union address he alluded to the Dream Act by stating, "hundreds of thousands of talented, hardworking students in this country face another challenge: The fact that they aren't yet American citizens."&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="text-align: justify; margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;He similarly referenced the Dream Act in his 2011 State of the Union address where he cited "hundreds of thousands of students excelling in our schools who are not American citizens." In 2011, he pointed out that, "they grew up as Americans and pledge allegiance to our flag, and yet they live every day with the threat of deportation." In a more recent attempt to explain their plight, he stated that, "many were brought here as small children, are American through and through, yet they live every day with the threat of deportation."&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="text-align: justify; margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;Obviously more is needed than these almost identical statements in an annual State of the Union address. These statements haven’t been enough to get the job done. Furthermore, Congress has been unable to agree on even the most fundamental understanding of this complicated and far reaching problem that we face. Let’s take note of some facts that shouldn’t be in dispute:&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;There are millions of undocumented workers presently in this country,&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Whether it’s because of our labor needs &lt;i&gt;pull&lt;/i&gt; workers from outside the U.S. (Americans are unwilling to take the no or low skill/minimum wage jobs that we need filled across the country everyday) or because depressed foreign economies &lt;i&gt;push&lt;/i&gt; workers into the U.S. (better opportunity in the U.S. to earn a living) or most likely a combination of both; workers continue to cross our borders and it appears that this will not change in our present regional economic environment,&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Children are brought to the U.S. by their families in an effort to maintain family unity. The children of undocumented workers make no more of the decision regarding their destiny, to come into the U.S., than the children of documented workers.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;div style="text-align: justify; margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;I think that all these add up to further the fact that children will continue to come into the U.S. without documentation for the same reasons that hundreds of thousands are already here. We will continue to have a problem that the President and Congress need to solve.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="text-align: justify; margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;Does anyone understand the immigration positions of the leading Republican candidates? I will try to explain what I have heard. Mitt wanted to round-up the millions of undocumented persons and deport them. Once this was finally recognized as an impossible task by any government, (imagine the impossibility of humanely moving 10-20 million people out of a country) Mitt altered his stance to offer “self-deportation”, saying that if an undocumented worker didn’t leave, they would simply not be allowed to work. I don’t see how that is going to encourage “self-deportation” since that is the exact situation today. Undocumented workers are not eligible to work. They work anyway. That is why they are “undocumented” in the first place!&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="text-align: justify; margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;Newt, on the other hand, has seemed to solidify his stance throughout the campaign, first suggesting that there should be a path to “legality” and now during the recent debates, suggesting what appears to be the opposite as he now posits that illegal workers should not be allowed a path to “citizenship.” It seems that he has crafted a position that can have dual meanings, depending upon his audience. Newt’s position is that undocumented persons with deep ties to the U.S. would be able to obtain a work permit and thereby attain “legality” or legal status in the U.S. without being allowed a path to citizenship. Of course, any of those same people could attain citizenship if they left the U.S. and processed applications in accordance with current immigration and nationality laws. His permit is referred to as the “red card.”&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="text-align: justify; margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;It is imperative that we continue to fight for the children that are impacted negatively by the application of the current immigration laws. The consequence is that their development is inhibited. The same can be said for the development of our economy and culture. What is required here is leadership. The President, whoever that may be, must lead the country and our Congress in the same way Presidents in history were required to lead us toward profound legislative change, like the Civil Rights Act and Equal Protection, for the benefit of individuals. We have had a lot of talk. The late Ted Kennedy said that we have had enough discussion about immigration. We all know the arguments on both sides. We need leadership.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Robert Meltzer&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Chief Executive Officer&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/464/Where-is-Comprehensive-Immigration-Reform.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/464/Where-is-Comprehensive-Immigration-Reform.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/464/Where-is-Comprehensive-Immigration-Reform.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 17:41:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=464</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>February 2012 Visa Bulletin</title>
      <link>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/463/February-2012-Visa-Bulletin.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;span style="line-height: 115%"&gt;The VISANOW Visa Bulletin update is back from hibernation! The USCIS seems to have turned over a new and more productive leaf in the new year and shows advancements in almost every employment-based and family-based immigration category.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;span style="line-height: 115%"&gt;The F-1 category, unmarried children over 21 of permanent residents, has advanced rather dramatically, with China, India, Philippines, and all other areas charging ahead one month and seven days ahead. Mexico is not as speedy, and inches ahead by only seven days.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;span style="line-height: 115%"&gt;The F-2A category, spouses and unmarried children under 21 of lawful permanent residents, exhibits progress across the board with China, India, Philippines, and all other areas scooting two months forward to 06/08/2009, while Mexico mimics the move with a two month advance to 05/08/2009.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;span style="line-height: 115%"&gt;In the F-2B category, or unmarried children 21 years or older of permanent residents, China, India, and all other areas continue to forge ahead to 10/15/2003. The Philippines follows suit and progresses one month to 11/01/2001, while Mexico remains stagnant at 12/01/1992.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;span style="line-height: 115%"&gt;The F-3 category, married sons and daughters of permanent residents, urges itself forward against the bitter winter wind. Each category advanced one month, bringing China, India, and all other areas to 12/01/2001; Mexico to 01/01/1993; and the Philippines to 07/22/1992. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt; &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;span style="line-height: 115%"&gt;Encouragingly, February’s Visa Bulletin for employment-based immigration depicts similar progressions. Unsurprisingly, the EB-1 category continues to remain current. The EB-2 category seems to be the star pupil, keeping Mexico, Philippines, and all other areas current while China and India leap forward one full year to 01/01/2010. The EB-3 category shows more modest progress, sliding each category forward less than a month. The “Other Worker” category copies the EB-3’s, inching each area forward by only twenty-one days except for China, which stays at 04/22/2003. All other categories remain current.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;span style="line-height: 115%"&gt;Employment-Based Visa Bulletin for February:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="487" style="width: 365.2pt"&gt;
    &lt;tbody&gt;
        &lt;tr&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Employment- Based&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: 15pt; margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style="color: #404040"&gt;All Chargeability Areas Except Those Listed&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;b&gt;CHINA- mainland born&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;b&gt;INDIA&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;b&gt;MEXICO&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;b&gt;PHILIPPINES&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
        &lt;/tr&gt;
        &lt;tr style="height: 15pt"&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; height: 15pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;1st&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; height: 15pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;C&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; height: 15pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;C&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; height: 15pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;C&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; height: 15pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;C&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; height: 15pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;C&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
        &lt;/tr&gt;
        &lt;tr style="height: 15pt"&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; height: 15pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;2nd&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td width="97" style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; width: 72.45pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; height: 15pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;C&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td width="70" style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; width: 52.8pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; height: 15pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #ff0000"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;01JAN10&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td width="66" style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; width: 49.6pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; height: 15pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #ff0000"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;01JAN10&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td width="64" style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; width: 47.85pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; height: 15pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;C&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td width="93" style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; width: 69.8pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; height: 15pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;C&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
        &lt;/tr&gt;
        &lt;tr style="height: 15pt"&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; height: 15pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;3rd&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; height: 15pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #ff0000"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;22FEB06&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; height: 15pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #ff0000"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;01DEC04&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; height: 15pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #ff0000"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;15AUG02&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; height: 15pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #ff0000"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;22FEB06&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; height: 15pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #ff0000"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;22FEB06&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
        &lt;/tr&gt;
        &lt;tr style="height: 15pt"&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; height: 15pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;Other Workers&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; height: 15pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #ff0000"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;22FEB06&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; height: 15pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;22APR03&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; height: 15pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #ff0000"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;15AUG02&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; height: 15pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #ff0000"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;22FEB06&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; height: 15pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #ff0000"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;22FEB06&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
        &lt;/tr&gt;
        &lt;tr style="height: 15pt"&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; height: 15pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;4th&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; height: 15pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;C&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; height: 15pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;C&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; height: 15pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;C&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; height: 15pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;C&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; height: 15pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;C&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
        &lt;/tr&gt;
        &lt;tr style="height: 15pt"&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; height: 15pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;Certain Religious Workers&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; height: 15pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;C&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; height: 15pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;C&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; height: 15pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;C&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; height: 15pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;C&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; height: 15pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;C&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
        &lt;/tr&gt;
        &lt;tr style="height: 15pt"&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; height: 15pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: 15pt; margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #404040"&gt;5th&lt;br /&gt;
            &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="color: #404040"&gt;Targeted&lt;br /&gt;
            Employment&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="color: #404040"&gt; Areas/&lt;br /&gt;
            Regional Centers&lt;br /&gt;
            and &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="color: #404040"&gt;Pilot Programs&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; height: 15pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;C&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; height: 15pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;C&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; height: 15pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;C&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; height: 15pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;C&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; height: 15pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;C&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
        &lt;/tr&gt;
    &lt;/tbody&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style="color: #404040"&gt;Legend&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="line-height: normal; text-indent: -0.25in; margin: 0in 0in 0pt 1in"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #404040"&gt;·&lt;span style="font: 7pt 'Times New Roman'"&gt;         &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="color: #404040"&gt;C = current as there is no waiting period necessary to file for permanent residency&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="line-height: normal; text-indent: -0.25in; margin: 0in 0in 0pt 1in"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #404040"&gt;·&lt;span style="font: 7pt 'Times New Roman'"&gt;         &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="color: #404040"&gt;U = unavailable as visa supply has been exhausted for the remainder of fiscal year, or legislation creating the category has expired&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="line-height: normal; text-indent: -0.25in; margin: 0in 0in 10pt 1in"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #404040"&gt;·&lt;span style="font: 7pt 'Times New Roman'"&gt;         &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="color: #404040"&gt;Date indicated = cut-off date that indicates a backlog; if the priority date (date the labor certification or I-140 was filed, depending on the type of case) is BEFORE the date listed, one may apply for permanent residency&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #404040"&gt;Employment-Based Preferences&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="line-height: normal; text-indent: -0.25in; margin: 0in 0in 0pt 1in"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #404040"&gt;·&lt;span style="font: 7pt 'Times New Roman'"&gt;         &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="color: #404040"&gt;First: Priority Workers&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="line-height: normal; text-indent: -0.25in; margin: 0in 0in 0pt 1in"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #404040"&gt;·&lt;span style="font: 7pt 'Times New Roman'"&gt;         &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="color: #404040"&gt;Second: Members of the Professions Holding Advanced Degrees or Persons of Exceptional Ability&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="line-height: normal; text-indent: -0.25in; margin: 0in 0in 0pt 1in"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #404040"&gt;·&lt;span style="font: 7pt 'Times New Roman'"&gt;         &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="color: #404040"&gt;Third: Skilled Workers, Professionals, and Other Workers&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="line-height: normal; text-indent: -0.25in; margin: 0in 0in 0pt 1in"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #404040"&gt;·&lt;span style="font: 7pt 'Times New Roman'"&gt;         &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="color: #404040"&gt;Fourth: Certain Special Immigrants&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="line-height: normal; text-indent: -0.25in; margin: 0in 0in 10pt 1in"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;·&lt;span style="font: 7pt 'Times New Roman'"&gt;         &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="color: #404040"&gt;Fifth: Employment Creation&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;span style="line-height: 115%"&gt;Family-based Visa Bulletin for February:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="503" style="width: 377.2pt"&gt;
    &lt;tbody&gt;
        &lt;tr&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Family-Sponsored&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;b&gt;All Chargeability Areas Except Those Listed&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;b&gt;CHINA-mainland born&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;b&gt;INDIA&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;b&gt;MEXICO&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;b&gt;PHILIPPINES&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
        &lt;/tr&gt;
        &lt;tr&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;F1&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #ff0000"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;22DEC04&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #ff0000"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;22DEC04&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #ff0000"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;22DEC04&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #ff0000"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;22APR93&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #ff0000"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;22MAY97&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
        &lt;/tr&gt;
        &lt;tr&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;F2A&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #ff0000"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;08JUN09&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #ff0000"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;08JUN09&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #ff0000"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;08JUN09&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #ff0000"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;08MAY09&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #ff0000"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;08JUN09&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
        &lt;/tr&gt;
        &lt;tr&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;F2B&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #ff0000"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;15OCT03&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #ff0000"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;15OCT03&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #ff0000"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;15OCT03&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;01DEC92&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #ff0000"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;01NOV01&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
        &lt;/tr&gt;
        &lt;tr&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;F3&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #ff0000"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;01DEC01&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #ff0000"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;01DEC01&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #ff0000"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;01DEC01&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #ff0000"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;01JAN93&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #ff0000"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;22JUL92&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
        &lt;/tr&gt;
        &lt;tr&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;F4&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;08SEP00&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;08SEP00&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;08SEP00&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;15MAY96&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td style="border-bottom: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-left: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-bottom: 1.5pt; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 1.5pt; padding-right: 1.5pt; border-top: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; border-right: #f0f0f0 1pt inset; padding-top: 1.5pt"&gt;
            &lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;01NOV88&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
        &lt;/tr&gt;
    &lt;/tbody&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style="color: #404040"&gt;Legend&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="line-height: normal; text-indent: -0.25in; margin: auto auto auto 1in"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #404040"&gt;·&lt;span style="font: 7pt 'Times New Roman'"&gt;         &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="color: #404040"&gt;C = current as there is no waiting period necessary to file for permanent residency&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="line-height: normal; text-indent: -0.25in; margin: auto auto auto 1in"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #404040"&gt;·&lt;span style="font: 7pt 'Times New Roman'"&gt;         &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="color: #404040"&gt;U = unavailable as visa supply has been exhausted for the remainder of fiscal year, or legislation creating the category has expired&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="line-height: normal; text-indent: -0.25in; margin: auto auto auto 1in"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #404040"&gt;·&lt;span style="font: 7pt 'Times New Roman'"&gt;         &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="color: #404040"&gt;Date indicated = cut-off date that indicates a backlog; if the priority date (date the I-130 was filed) is BEFORE the date listed, one may apply for permanent residency&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: auto auto auto 1in"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #404040"&gt;Family-Based Preferences&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="line-height: normal; text-indent: -0.25in; margin: auto auto auto 1in"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #404040"&gt;·&lt;span style="font: 7pt 'Times New Roman'"&gt;         &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="color: #404040"&gt;First: Unmarried sons and daughters (i.e., children over 21 years of age) of U.S. citizens&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="line-height: normal; text-indent: -0.25in; margin: auto auto auto 1in"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #404040"&gt;·&lt;span style="font: 7pt 'Times New Roman'"&gt;         &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="color: #404040"&gt;2A: Spouses and children (i.e., unmarried children under 21 years of age) of lawful permanent residents&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="line-height: normal; text-indent: -0.25in; margin: auto auto auto 1in"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #404040"&gt;·&lt;span style="font: 7pt 'Times New Roman'"&gt;         &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="color: #404040"&gt;2B: Unmarried sons and daughters (i.e., children over 21 years of age) of lawful permanent residents&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="line-height: normal; text-indent: -0.25in; margin: auto auto auto 1in"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #404040"&gt;·&lt;span style="font: 7pt 'Times New Roman'"&gt;         &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="color: #404040"&gt;Third: Married sons and daughters of U.S. citizens&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="text-indent: -0.25in; margin: 0in 0in 10pt 1in"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;span style="line-height: 115%"&gt;·&lt;span style="font: 7pt 'Times New Roman'"&gt;         &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="line-height: 115%; color: #404040"&gt;Fourth: Brothers and sisters of U.S. citizens&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/463/February-2012-Visa-Bulletin.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/463/February-2012-Visa-Bulletin.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/463/February-2012-Visa-Bulletin.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 16:45:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=463</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>August 2011 Visa Bulletin </title>
      <link>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/462/August-2011-Visa-Bulletin.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The August 2011 Visa Bulletin shows continued progress in both employment-based and family-based categories, and no signs of retrogression.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On the employment-based side, the EB-1 category remains current for all countries. In the EB-2 category, Mexico, the Philippines, and all other countries remain current. Major progress is once again seen for EB-2 China and EB-2 India as both moved forward by five weeks to April 15, 2007. This is welcome news as EB-2 China and EB-2 India have now seen a combined forward movement of more than six months since the June 2011 Visa Bulletin.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the EB-3 category, the rest of the world and the Philippines moved forward by three weeks to November 1, 2005, China moved forward by one week to July 8, 2004, and India moved forward by one month to June 1, 2002. EB-3 Mexico once again shows a major change as the priority date moved forward by six months to November 1, 2005. In the other workers category, the priority date for all other countries, Mexico, and the Philippines progressed forward by more than five months to May 1, 2005, it remained unchanged again for China, and moved forward by one month for India to June 1, 2002.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;All other employment-based categories remain current. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;img alt="" width="613" height="392" src="/Portals/16/Media/EB_VB_Aug_2011.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Legend&lt;br /&gt;
• C = current as there is no waiting period necessary to file for permanent residency&lt;br /&gt;
• U = unavailable as visa supply has been exhausted for the remainder of fiscal year, or legislation creating the category has expired&lt;br /&gt;
• Date indicated = cut-off date that indicates a backlog; if the priority date (date the labor certification or I-140 was filed, depending on the type of case) is BEFORE the date listed, one may apply for permanent residency&lt;br /&gt;
Employment-Based Preferences&lt;br /&gt;
• First: Priority Workers&lt;br /&gt;
• Second:  Members of the Professions Holding Advanced Degrees or Persons of Exceptional Ability&lt;br /&gt;
• Third:  Skilled Workers, Professionals, and Other Workers&lt;br /&gt;
• Fourth:  Certain Special Immigrants&lt;br /&gt;
• Fifth:  Employment Creation&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Family-Based Visa Bulletin for July 2011&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On the family-based side, the FB-1 priority dates remained the same: May 1, 2004 for all other countries, China, and India; March 8, 1993 for Mexico; and April 15, 1996 for the Philippines. The FB-2A category moved forward by four months to March 22, 2008 for the rest of the world, China, India, and the Philippines, while FB-2A Mexico moved forward by more than three months to June 1, 2008.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the FB-2B category, the priority date for the rest of the world, China, and India remained unchanged at July 1, 2003, while Mexico moved forward by just one week to October 1, 1992, and the Philippines moved forward by more than two months to December 1, 2000. The FB-3 priority date progressed forward by five weeks to August 22, 2001 for the rest of the world, China, and India, while the Philippines moved forward by one week to April 1, 1992, and Mexico once again remained unchanged. The FB-4 category shows progress as the rest of the world, China, and India moved forward by one month to April 8, 2000, Mexico moved forward by one week to March 8, 1996, and the Philippines remained unchanged at May 15, 1988.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To see the complete version of the August 2011 Visa Bulletin, please visit the Department of State’s website (&lt;a href="http://www.travel.state.gov/visa/bulletin/bulletin_5518.html"&gt;http://www.travel.state.gov/visa/bulletin/bulletin_5518.html&lt;/a&gt;).&lt;img alt="" width="585" height="202" src="/Portals/16/Media/FB_VB_Aug_2011.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; Legend&lt;br /&gt;
• C = current as there is no waiting period necessary to file for permanent residency&lt;br /&gt;
• U = unavailable as visa supply has been exhausted for the remainder of fiscal year, or legislation creating the category has expired&lt;br /&gt;
• Date indicated = cut-off date that indicates a backlog; if the priority date (date the I-130 was filed) is BEFORE the date listed, one may apply for permanent residency&lt;br /&gt;
Family-Based Preferences&lt;br /&gt;
• First: Unmarried sons and daughters (i.e., children over 21 years of age) of U.S. citizens&lt;br /&gt;
• 2A:  Spouses and children (i.e., unmarried children under 21 years of age) of lawful permanent residents&lt;br /&gt;
• 2B:  Unmarried sons and daughters (i.e., children over 21 years of age) of lawful permanent residents&lt;br /&gt;
• Third:  Married sons and daughters of U.S. citizens&lt;br /&gt;
• Fourth:  Brothers and sisters of U.S. citizens&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/462/August-2011-Visa-Bulletin.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/462/August-2011-Visa-Bulletin.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/462/August-2011-Visa-Bulletin.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 21:36:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=462</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Canada Alters ICT Hiring Guidelines</title>
      <link>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/461/Canada-Alters-ICT-Hiring-Guidelines.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt="" align="left" src="/Portals/16/media/canada.jpg" /&gt;On July 4, Citizenship and Immigration Canada (CIC) issued a new Operational Bulletin (OB316) and provided additional guidelines regarding Intra-Company Transferees (ICTs) under specialized knowledge. Since October 2010, there has been a substantial increase in the number of ICT applications due to the cancellation of Canadian exemption of labor market opinions for IT workers. The major shift will concern how ICT applications under specialized knowledge are to be reviewed by CIC officers and how these applications will be assessed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ICT applications under the specialized knowledge will be reviewed considering the following factors: education, knowledge, experience, salary, relevant training and supporting documentation. The knowledge component is superior in importance when officers are reviewing such applications. Knowledge of the prospective worker should be uncommon, gained through experience with the company abroad (which may include in-house training, specialty courses as developed and perfected by the company and no one else in the industry), difficult to acquire in a small time span, complex and not easily taught to others, or generally not available in the industry.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;It should be noted that CIC will strictly enforce appropriate evaluation of the specialized knowledge and therefore all available evidence of the foreign worker’s specialized experience and knowledge should be presented at the time of the application. Several example factors to consider:&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;• Would it take several years to train a worker to perform these duties?&lt;br /&gt;
• Is the required knowledge complex (i.e. not only does the worker need to know the IT aspect of the job, but also specific and unique to the company procedures, processes and/or products)? &lt;br /&gt;
• Is the knowledge uncommon, in other words, does it go beyond what is generally found in the industry?&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;The salary component is also important in the application process. According to CIC, “job offers must present salaries that are realistic in terms of Canadian wage-levels for the occupation concerned.” The CIC also wants to enforce that the applications should not be accepted nor rejected based on salary alone.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;Due to the increase in ICT applications over the past year, CIC wants to make sure that only the most intelligent and experienced specialized knowledge applicants are hired to work in Canada under this ICT category.  Therefore, an example of a well-prepared application will include details regarding worker’s eligibility under the specialized knowledge provision, evidence of in-house training completed by the worker, specialized nature of projects completed during the worker’s tenure with the company, as well as evidence of salary/wage which may now include per diems (among other elements and factors specific to the job assigned under the ICT specialized knowledge provision). &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;The candidates’ specialized knowledge can help boost the Canadian economy in the near future.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;Photo attribution: &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/vincealongi/"&gt;http://www.flickr.com/photos/vincealongi/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/461/Canada-Alters-ICT-Hiring-Guidelines.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/461/Canada-Alters-ICT-Hiring-Guidelines.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/461/Canada-Alters-ICT-Hiring-Guidelines.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 13:50:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=461</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>H-1B Cap Count as of 7/1/2011</title>
      <link>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/460/H-1B-Cap-Count-as-of-7-1-2011.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt="" align="left" src="/Portals/16/media/exclaimation mark.jpg" /&gt;The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) released H-1B cap numbers as of 6/17/2011, receiving&lt;strong&gt; 19,000 &lt;/strong&gt;toward the 65,000 cap-subject H-1B petitions and &lt;strong&gt;12,200 &lt;/strong&gt;towards the 20,000 H-1B Master's category.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thus, H-1B cap numbers remain available, and there is still time to submit your FY2012 H-1B visa application for foreign national applicants beginning employment on October 1, 2011 or later.  &lt;a href="http://www.visanow.com/Contact-Us.aspx"&gt;Contact VISANOW&lt;/a&gt; to see if this is an option for you/your foreign national.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;VISANOW will be blogging regular updates on the H-1B cap in addition to notifying our social media followers of real-time information through &lt;a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/VISANOW-Global-Immigration/280675068957?v=wall"&gt;Facebook&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://twitter.com/VISANOW"&gt;Twitter&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Photo attribution: http://www.flickr.com/photos/8042373@N03/&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/460/H-1B-Cap-Count-as-of-7-1-2011.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/460/H-1B-Cap-Count-as-of-7-1-2011.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/460/H-1B-Cap-Count-as-of-7-1-2011.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 18:22:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=460</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>State-level E-Verify Legislation Progresses</title>
      <link>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/459/State-level-E-Verify-Legislation-Progresses.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt="" align="left" src="/Portals/16/media/everify.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;With the lack of comprehensive immigration reform from the Obama Administration, numerous states have taken creating immigration reform into their own hands. Although highly controversial and questioned as unconstitutional, other states such as Alabama, Tennessee, Mississippi, South Carolina and Louisiana have followed and continue to follow in Arizona’s footsteps with the controversial SB10170 legislation.&lt;/span&gt; &lt;a href="http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.eb1d4c2a3e5b9ac89243c6a7543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=75bce2e261405110VgnVCM1000004718190aRCRD&amp;vgnextchannel=75bce2e261405110VgnVCM1000004718190aRCRD"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;E-Verify&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;, an employment verification system operated by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and Social Security Administration (SSA), plays a large role in all of these local laws to verify legality. Below is a summary of state-level E-Verify legislation:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Arizona &lt;/strong&gt;—As one of the first states to mandate E-Verify for all employers, Arizona’s &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.azleg.gov/legtext/49leg/2r/bills/sb1070s.pdf "&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;SB1070&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt; has once again been approved by the U.S. Supreme Court. SB1070 allows police to check legal documents from everyone they suspect is in this country illegally.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Alabama &lt;/strong&gt;—Alabama passed a &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: x-small"&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.acca-online.org/legis_news/2011_bills/HB56-enr.pdf "&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;HB56&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt; that would require employees, as well as students, to use E-Verify to verify their legal status. Recently, a new addition to the bill allows for police officers to pull over anyone that looks suspicious and can ask for their documents. Many are angered and believe that Alabama has gone too far with this law. They think this bill is unconstitutional and will lead to racial profiling similar to Arizona. This could possibly be the toughest immigration law in the nation.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tennessee &lt;/strong&gt;—Unlike Arizona and Alabama, Tennessee has passed &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: x-small"&gt;&lt;a href="http://state.tn.us/sos/acts/106/pub/pc1112.pdf "&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;HB670&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt; which allows employers to use various forms of identification as validation instead of exclusively using E-Verify. Employers are allowed to accept documents ranging from driver’s licenses to birth certificates. This law will take effect starting January 1, 2012; employers with 5 or fewer employees will be exempt from this while all others will have to comply.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Mississippi &lt;/strong&gt;—Mississippi recently implemented a new E-Verify tool called Records and Information from DMVs for E-Verify (&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: x-small"&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextchannel=a2dd6d26d17df110VgnVCM1000004718190aRCRD&amp;vgnextoid=304cadec01a80310VgnVCM100000082ca60aRCRD"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;RIDE&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;). RIDE enables employees’ driver’s license to be used as identification instead of filling out I-9s. This new system hopes to combat fraud while using E-Verify.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;South Carolina &lt;/strong&gt;—Recently, Governor Nikki Haley passed an immigration bill &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: x-small"&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.scstatehouse.gov/sess119_2011-2012/bills/20.htm "&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;S20&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt; that will cost South Carolina $1.3 million in creating an illegal enforcement unit with 12 full time officials. With this new law, Haley is requiring all employers to verify their employees are legal by using E-Verify as well as allowing police to check the citizenship of people they deem criminals or they stop for any reason. This bill was passed on June 21 with a 69-43 vote, favored by the Republicans. On the opposing side, Democrats believe this bill will encourage racial profiling and that immigration reform should be a federal legislation.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Louisiana &lt;/strong&gt;—Louisiana has also jumped on the E-Verify bandwagon for the state’s private and public businesses. Governor Bobby Jindal signed two legislations into law, &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: x-small"&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.mygov365.com/legislation/view/id/4db66fd449e51bd334260600/tab/versions/ "&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;HB342&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt; and &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.mygov365.com/legislation/view/id/4def241f49e51b1544ac0100/tab/versions/ "&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;HB646&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;. HB342 requires that all local and state contractors must use E-Verify to verify that all employees are legally documented. HB646 mandates that all private businesses must check all employees with E-Verify to make sure no illegal workers are hired. Governor Jindal believes it is time for Louisiana to take the initiative with immigration policies in lieu of federal reform.  As in other states that have passed immigration Bills, people are angry about the sudden new law and are protesting against it.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial"&gt;Many governors are hoping that if numerous states begin passing their own laws on illegal immigration, that the federal government will make one illegal immigration law state-wide. Further, since January, nine states including the ones listed above have mandated E-Verify for employers including &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: x-small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial"&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/412/Florida-Adopts-E-Verify-Rhode-Island-Repeals-It.aspx"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;Florida&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;, Indiana, North Carolina and &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/102/New-State-Level-E-Verify-Rules-Utah-and-Virginia.aspx"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;Virginia&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;. Of those states, four (&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/445/New-E-Verify-and-Immigration-Requirements-in-Georgia.aspx"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;Georgia&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;, Alabama, South Carolina and &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/102/New-State-Level-E-Verify-Rules-Utah-and-Virginia.aspx"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;Utah&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial"&gt;) have created SB1070-like laws. With the patchwork of state-level legislation, the need for comprehensive immigration reform is highlighted and becomes more critical.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial"&gt;For more information on state-wide immigration laws or E-Verify legislations, please &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: x-small"&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.visanow.com/Contact-Us.aspx "&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial"&gt;contact VISANOW&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial"&gt;. Timely updates on legislation can be found on VISANOW’s blog or our other social media outlets, &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: x-small"&gt;&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/#!/visanow "&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial"&gt;Twitter&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial"&gt; and &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: x-small"&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/VISANOW-Global-Immigration/280675068957?v=wall "&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial"&gt;Facebook&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial"&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Photo attribution: uscis.gov&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/459/State-level-E-Verify-Legislation-Progresses.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/459/State-level-E-Verify-Legislation-Progresses.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/459/State-level-E-Verify-Legislation-Progresses.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 15:37:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=459</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Menendez Reintroduces Immigration Reform Act</title>
      <link>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/458/Menendez-Reintroduces-Immigration-Reform-Act.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img border="0" alt="i9 audits work verification" align="left" src="/Portals/16/media/statue of liberty.jpg" /&gt;Sen. Robert Menendez (D-NJ), along with six democratic senators, recently reintroduced an immigration reform bill entitled &lt;a href="http://www.micevhill.com/attachments/immigration_documents/hosted_documents/112th_congress/ShortSummaryOfMenendezCIRBill.pdf"&gt;The Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2011&lt;/a&gt;. The legislation aims to strengthen border security, enhance worksite enforcement of immigration laws, and requires that undocumented immigrants currently living in the U.S. to pass numerous checkpoints before attaining permanent residency.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The proposed bill will also include the DREAM Act. Sen. Richard Durbin, a supporter of Menendez’s bill, commented, “I want the &lt;a href="http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/447/Dispelling-DREAM-Act-Misconceptions.aspx"&gt;DREAM Act &lt;/a&gt;to be the catalyst for comprehensive immigration reform.” Durbin believes passing the DREAM Act will help to kick-start support and open up doors for the U.S.’s need for a comprehensive immigration reform.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Unlike Rep. Lamar Smith’s &lt;a href="http:// http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/452/Congressman-Smith-Looks-to-Mandate-E-Verify-Usage-for-Employers.aspx \"&gt;E-Verify bill&lt;/a&gt;, this legislation allows immigrants to remain in the country if they follow the new bill’s path towards permanent residency. Although the bill requires the use of an employee verification system, workers will not be deported.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The checkpoints that illegal aliens have to pass include registering with the U.S. government, paying taxes, learning English, passing a background check, paying penalties for having false documents and waiting in line for permanent residence. Menendez’s bill also creates common-sense rules to ensure that current U.S. citizens are not wrongfully arrested and requires the use of an employment verification system.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“This is common-sense legislation that addresses the realities of the situation, stops the flow across our borders, and contributes to our economic recovery. If we can put political grandstanding aside and come together on a comprehensive, pragmatic bill like this one, we can bring resolution to a great national need,” Menendez said.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Photo attribution: &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/davidprior/"&gt;http://www.flickr.com/photos/davidprior/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/458/Menendez-Reintroduces-Immigration-Reform-Act.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/458/Menendez-Reintroduces-Immigration-Reform-Act.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/458/Menendez-Reintroduces-Immigration-Reform-Act.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 15:32:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=458</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Pacific Steel Undergoing I-9 Audit</title>
      <link>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/457/Pacific-Steel-Undergoing-I-9-Audit.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img border="0" alt="i9 audits work verification" align="left" src="/Portals/16/media/ICE%20badge.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Pacific Steel Casting Company, the fourth largest steel industry in the nation, is undergoing an investigation by the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) for highly suspicious activity involving hiring illegal aliens.  Based in Berkeley, California, the steel company is being forced by ICE to submit I-9 forms for all 500 employees in three days.  ICE is also asking the employers for all I-9 forms from the past 12 months from the steel company, even if the employees have left or been fired. As a very diverse employer with about 30 different types of nationalities on staff, the company is concerned about the ramifications of the I-9 audit on their employees and the Berkeley community.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I-9 raids are likely to continue, and companies should take steps now to ensure compliance. &lt;a href="http://www.visanow.com/Contact-Us.aspx"&gt;Contact us &lt;/a&gt;to learn more about VISANOW’s compliance services.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Pacific Steel Casting Company is concerned about what the audit could affect their employees, company ramifications, as well as the Berkeley community, since it is a very liberal populace that is known to welcome all nationalities to their community.  Pacific Steel is very involved in the Berkeley community in many ways, one of the most important, by cleaning the environment.  As one of Berkeley’s main revenue sources, with $60 million in assets, the ramifications of Pacific Steel’s I-9 audit could have a significant negative impact on the Berkeley community and economy. Another company that had been investigated for I-9 compliances, &lt;a href="http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/54/Non-Compliance-Tests-Long-time-Immigration-Advocates.aspx"&gt;American Apparel&lt;/a&gt;, never seemed to recover from having to dismiss 10% of its workforce.  &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Photo attribution: http://www.flickr.com/photos/figgenhoffer/&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/457/Pacific-Steel-Undergoing-I-9-Audit.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/457/Pacific-Steel-Undergoing-I-9-Audit.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/457/Pacific-Steel-Undergoing-I-9-Audit.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 14:27:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=457</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>H-1B Cap Count as of 6/17/2011</title>
      <link>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/456/H-1B-Cap-Count-as-of-6-17-2011.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt="" align="left" src="/Portals/16/media/exclaimation mark.jpg" /&gt;The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) released H-1B cap numbers as of 6/17/2011, receiving&lt;strong&gt; 16,300&lt;/strong&gt; toward the 65,000 cap-subject H-1B petitions and &lt;strong&gt;10,800 &lt;/strong&gt;towards the 20,000 H-1B Master's category.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thus, H-1B cap numbers remain available, and there is still time to submit your FY2012 H-1B visa application for foreign national applicants beginning employment on October 1, 2011 or later.  &lt;a href="http://www.visanow.com/Contact-Us.aspx"&gt;Contact VISANOW&lt;/a&gt; to see if this is an option for you/your foreign national.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;VISANOW will be blogging regular updates on the H-1B cap in addition to notifying our social media followers of real-time information through &lt;a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/VISANOW-Global-Immigration/280675068957?v=wall"&gt;Facebook&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://twitter.com/VISANOW"&gt;Twitter&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Photo attribution: http://www.flickr.com/photos/8042373@N03/&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/456/H-1B-Cap-Count-as-of-6-17-2011.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/456/H-1B-Cap-Count-as-of-6-17-2011.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/456/H-1B-Cap-Count-as-of-6-17-2011.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 16:27:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=456</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>July 2011 Visa Bulletin</title>
      <link>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/455/July-2011-Visa-Bulletin.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="/Portals/16/media/VB image.jpg" style="float: left;" alt="naturalization" /&gt;The July 2011 Visa Bulletin shows progress and provides hope for families and individuals in America and throughout the world. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the employment-based side, the EB-1 category remains current for all countries. In the EB-2 category, Mexico, the Philippines, and all other countries remain current. Major progress is seen for EB-2 China and EB-2 India as both moved forward by almost five months to March 8, 2007. We are likely seeing a “carryover effect” as a decrease in demand for EB-1 visa numbers is allowing unused numbers to become available in the EB-2 category. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the EB-3 category, the rest of the world and the Philippines moved forward by three weeks to October 8, 2005, China moved forward by more than six weeks to July 1, 2004, India moved forward by one week to May 1, 2002, and Mexico moved forward by more than six months to July 1, 2005. In the other workers category, the priority date for all other countries, Mexico, and the Philippines moved forward by more than one year to November 22, 2004, it remained unchanged for China, and moved forward by one week for India to May 1, 2002. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All other employment-based categories remain current.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;img src="/Portals/16/media/July2011-VB-EB.jpg" style="float: left;" alt="naturalization" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="clear: both;"&gt; Legend&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;C = current as there is no waiting period necessary to file for permanent residency&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;U = unavailable as visa supply has been exhausted for the remainder of fiscal year, or legislation creating the category has expired&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Date indicated = cut-off date that indicates a backlog; if the priority date (date the labor certification or I-140 was filed, depending on the type of case) is BEFORE the date listed, one may apply for permanent residency&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Employment-Based Preferences&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;First: Priority Workers&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Second:  Members of the Professions Holding Advanced Degrees or Persons of Exceptional Ability&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Third:  Skilled Workers, Professionals, and Other Workers&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Fourth:  Certain Special Immigrants&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Fifth:  Employment Creation&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Family-Based Visa Bulletin for July 2011&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the family-based side, the FB-1 priority date of May 1, 2004 remained the same for all other countries, China, and India, while Mexico moved forward by one week to March 8, 1993, and the Philippines moved forward by seven weeks to April 15, 1996. The FB-2A category moved forward by seven months to March 22, 2008 for the rest of the world, China, India, and the Philippines, while Mexico moved forward by close to seven months to February 15, 2008. The continued progress in the FB-2A category is welcome news when considering the retrogression that was visible earlier in the year.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the FB-2B category, the rest of the world, China, and India moved forward by two and half months to July 1, 2003, while Mexico moved forward by one month to September 22, 1992, and the Philippines moved forward by three and half months to September 22, 2000. The FB-3 category moved forward by six weeks to July 15, 2001 for the rest of the world, China, and India, while The Philippines moved forward by two weeks to March 22, 1992, and Mexico remained unchanged. In the FB-4 category, the priority date of March 8, 2000 remained the same for the rest of the world, China, and India, while Mexico moved forward by two weeks to March 1, 1996, and the Philippines moved forward by two weeks to May 15, 1988.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;img src="/Portals/16/media/July2011-VB-FB.jpg" style="float: left;" alt="naturalization" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="clear: both;"&gt; Legend&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;C = current as there is no waiting period necessary to file for permanent residency&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;U = unavailable as visa supply has been exhausted for the remainder of fiscal year, or legislation creating the category has expired&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Date indicated = cut-off date that indicates a backlog; if the priority date (date the I-130 was filed) is BEFORE the date listed, one may apply for permanent residency&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Family-Based Preferences&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;First: Unmarried sons and daughters (i.e., children over 21 years of age) of U.S. citizens&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;2A:  Spouses and children (i.e., unmarried children under 21 years of age) of lawful permanent residents&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;2B:  Unmarried sons and daughters (i.e., children over 21 years of age) of lawful permanent residents&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Third:  Married sons and daughters of U.S. citizens&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Fourth:  Brothers and sisters of U.S. citizens&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Photo attribution: http://www.flickr.com/photos/8042373@N03/&lt;span style="color: rgb(255, 255, 255);"&gt;VISANOW&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/455/July-2011-Visa-Bulletin.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/455/July-2011-Visa-Bulletin.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/455/July-2011-Visa-Bulletin.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 15:39:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=455</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Visit VISANOW (Booth #3314) at SHRM</title>
      <link>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/454/Visit-VISANOW-Booth-3314-at-SHRM.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt="" width="296" height="56" src="/Portals/16/VISANOW_Logos/VISANOW_Logo.png" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;VISANOW is headed to the Society for Human Resources Management (SHRM) Annual Conference and Exhibition in Las Vegas June 26-29. If you are attending the conference, stop by our booth (#3314 in the Global section of the exhibition near the entrance to the General Sessions) to learn more about streamlining your immigration process. Every booth visitor will receive a FREE gift and have the chance to enter a raffle to win $1,000 in travel vouchers on American Airlines!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Key speakers at the conference include founder and president of Virgin Group Sir Richard Branson, CEO of Zappos.com Tony Hsieh, Editor-in-chief of the Huffington Post Media Group Arianna Huffington and Emmy-award-winning actor Michael J. Fox. Attendees also have the opportunity to attend seminars on personal leadership and development, international HR, and strategic management.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/454/Visit-VISANOW-Booth-3314-at-SHRM.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/454/Visit-VISANOW-Booth-3314-at-SHRM.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/454/Visit-VISANOW-Booth-3314-at-SHRM.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 20:56:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=454</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A Bright IDEA</title>
      <link>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/453/A-Bright-IDEA.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt="" align="left" src="/Portals/16/media/globe.jpg" /&gt;Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-California) recently introduced the IDEA Act (Immigration Driving Entrepreneurship in America). The act focuses on increasing STEM visas, which are for students studying science, technology, engineering and mathematics in the U.S., and making it easier for students to get visas. The bill, only backed by Democrats, also promises L and H-1B visas reformation to end abuse of the easier-to-get visas. Further, it has a goal to create new types of green cards for entrepreneurial immigrants who have $500,000 in American investments or immigrants who start their own companies that employ at least 10 Americans.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rep. Lofgren wants to eliminate student fears of being deported while studying. “My bill would allow some of the world's sharpest minds to stay in the U.S. and help us grow our economy,” Lofgren said. Lofgren has a point—we have been educating brilliant foreign minds at public universities in the U.S. and then are essentially asking them to leave our country and grow the economies of their native countries.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Additionally, the bill plans on creating a program to invest scholarship money in STEM areas of study. This can help create a workforce of intelligent American-educated students that can confront our future scientific and technological needs.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; Photo credit: &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/milesdeelite/"&gt;milesdeelite&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/453/A-Bright-IDEA.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/453/A-Bright-IDEA.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/453/A-Bright-IDEA.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 16:48:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=453</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Congressman Smith Looks to Mandate E-Verify Usage for Employers</title>
      <link>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/452/Congressman-Smith-Looks-to-Mandate-E-Verify-Usage-for-Employers.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: x-small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial"&gt;&lt;img alt="" align="left" src="/Portals/16/media/everify.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: x-small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial"&gt;Lamar Smith (R-Texas) presented the mandatory E-Verify bill to the U.S. House Judiciary Immigration subcommittee this week. Smith wants to make the use of E-Verify, an employment verification system operated by both the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Social Security Administration (SSA), mandatory for all employers when hiring new employees.&lt;a href="http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/442/E-Verify-Offers-Spanish-Version-for-Users.aspx"&gt;E-Verify remains very controversial&lt;/a&gt;. Although Smith contends that the program will be beneficial to the country, it can also hurt our country in various ways by adding to the country’s high deficit, causing thousands to lose their jobs, and pushing workers to work in the black market.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;font size="3"&gt;&lt;font face="Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: x-small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial"&gt;If all favors Smith, the bill will be forwarded to Congress, and if passed, it would advance to the President’s desk. If the use of E-Verify becomes a federal requirement, it will be phased in over a period of four years. In each of those four years, different sized companies will be required to use the software program when hiring new employees. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: x-small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial"&gt;According to Smith, 7 million people work illegally in the U.S. while 26 million legal citizens are currently unemployed. He believes that those legal citizens should not have to compete with the illegal workers, and asserts that 70% of Americans are in agreement. While many republicans are on board with Smith, organizations including America’s Voice (a pro-immigration reform website) and the American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA) strongly believe this bill will damage the economy.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;font size="3"&gt;&lt;font face="Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: x-small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial"&gt;Smith claims that the E-Verify system is more reliable than the current “error-prone” I-9 system. Fake documents acquired by illegal workers often pass through the I-9 system. Smith defends that the E-Verify system will not be foiled by such fraudulent papers because of cross-checking information with the SSA. Under the bill, if workers are caught with fraudulent Social Security or identification numbers, they can face criminal penalties for up to two years.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;font size="3"&gt;&lt;font face="Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: x-small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial"&gt;On the other hand, America’s Voice reports that the program only identifies illegal workers half of the time. The program will end up costing $17.3 billion over ten years—adding to the country’s deficit. They also reported that around 800,000 Americans could end up losing their jobs due to government database errors. AILA is on the same page as America’s Voice. David Leopold, President of AILA, has many concerns if the bill becomes a law. Knowing that many illegal workers will not deport themselves, he is afraid that millions will begin working in the black market. Leopold said, “[Undocumented workers] will be pushed into the underground economy where they will not have labor protections.”&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;font size="3"&gt;&lt;font face="Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: x-small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial"&gt;According to Smith’s E-Verify proposal, within the first six months, companies with employing over 10,000 employees must enroll in the program. After one year, all government organizations and employers with over 500 employees would be required to use E-Verify. Companies with more than 20 employees must use E-Verify after 18 months. Among the second year, employers with fewer than 20 employees will be asked to use the system. After three years, agricultural companies will start verifying employees. By the fourth year of installment, every employer in the country will be required to confirm legal status of all employees by using E-Verify. Also, the amount of time that employers are required to save verification documents of employee information will increase to five years from the date of hire. Currently, it is required to save for three years.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;font size="3"&gt;&lt;font face="Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: x-small"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Photo attribution: uscis.gov&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/452/Congressman-Smith-Looks-to-Mandate-E-Verify-Usage-for-Employers.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/452/Congressman-Smith-Looks-to-Mandate-E-Verify-Usage-for-Employers.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/452/Congressman-Smith-Looks-to-Mandate-E-Verify-Usage-for-Employers.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 16:43:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=452</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Obama Administration Continues Silent I-9 Raids</title>
      <link>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/451/Obama-Administration-Continues-Silent-I-9-Raids.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt="" align="left" width="180" height="240" src="/Portals/16/media/gen i-9.jpg" /&gt;Yesterday, the Obama administration notified over 1,000 more U.S. companies throughout all 50 states that the government intends to check hiring records for illegal workers soon. These “silent raids” can lead to mass employee loss, legal expenses and decreased productivity. Since October 1, 2,338 companies have been audited by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) — this surpasses the previous year’s record of 2,196. Industries usually affected by the audits include food production, information technology, financial services and construction. Information on when the raid will take place and which companies will be targeted has not been released.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I-9 employer raids are not new, but employers have been claiming that they are not able to monitor their work forces, and fear asking employees for additional documentation due to discrimination lawsuits. However, I-9 raids are highly likely to continue in lieu of comprehensive immigration reform. Employers need to take steps now to ensure compliance (e.g. conduct an I-9 audit, use an online I-9 system, etc.), or if audited by ICE, they may face a multitude of fines and fees.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Former President George W. Bush focused his I-9 compliance efforts on high-profile raids of illegal workers and deportations without charging companies. Conversely, the Obama administration has made employers the bull’s-eye of enforcement. According to officials, “jobs are the magnet for illegal immigration.” So far in the 2011 fiscal year, 157 employers are facing criminal arrests, 262,282 illegal workers have been deported and $7.1 million in fines have been collected.&lt;a href="http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/194/I-9-Compliance-Critical-for-Small-Businesses-Too.aspx"&gt;Company size doesn’t matter with I-9 enforcement&lt;/a&gt;, as small and large companies are both liable for I-9 errors. Some targets of I-9 non-compliance include well-known companies such as &lt;a href="http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/54/Non-Compliance-Tests-Long-time-Immigration-Advocates.aspx"&gt;American Apparel &lt;/a&gt;and &lt;a href="http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/419/Chipotle-Gets-ICE-d.aspx"&gt;Chipotle Mexican Grill&lt;/a&gt;. American Apparel lost more than 25% of its employees in 2009 while Chipotle had to fire hundreds of workers due to an audit that began last year in Minnesota.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Photo attribution: &lt;a href="http://www.visanow.comi-9photo"&gt;http://www.flickr.com/photos/bridgetwillard/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/451/Obama-Administration-Continues-Silent-I-9-Raids.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/451/Obama-Administration-Continues-Silent-I-9-Raids.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/451/Obama-Administration-Continues-Silent-I-9-Raids.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 18:46:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=451</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Australian 457 Visa Applications Boom</title>
      <link>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/450/Australian-457-Visa-Applications-Boom.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt="" align="left" src="/Portals/16/media/aussie.jpg" /&gt;Over the past few years, Australia has experienced a decline in temporary migration levels—the amount of migrants in 2010-2011 is around half of what it was in 2008-2009. Despite the drastic decline, the number of 457 visa applications, which allows skilled overseas workers to work in Australia for up to four years, has surpassed those of previous years. More and more skilled laborers have applied for the 457 visa due to Australia’s improved economic environment and increasing demand for overseas workers to fill skills vacancies, according to the Department of Immigration and Citizenship (DIAC).  An increase in applications and government commitment to streamline the process will help to maintain the country’s access to skilled workers when local skilled labor is in short supply.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So far in 2011, there have been at least 42,872 applications for the 457 visa—this is 4,000 more applications than last year. The government has also tried to speed up the processing of the documents - processing times are about 30 per cent lower than five years ago. On average, it takes 22 days to process a 457 visa, and with hopes of further reducing this time by half, the Australian government plans to allocate funding for a 457 visa processing center in Brisbane.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Photo attribution: &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/darrolhouser/"&gt;http://www.flickr.com/photos/darrolhouser/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/450/Australian-457-Visa-Applications-Boom.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/450/Australian-457-Visa-Applications-Boom.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/450/Australian-457-Visa-Applications-Boom.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 21:34:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=450</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Another VISANOW Enhancement - Intuitive Navigation, Case Details, and Resource Center</title>
      <link>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/449/Another-VISANOW-Enhancement-Intuitive-Navigation-Case-Details-and-Resource-Center.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt="Dreamact" align="left" src="/Portals/16/media/newapp.jpg" /&gt;In our continued effort to deliver the industry’s most service-oriented user experience, VISANOW has introduced significant improvements to our dynamic immigration services application.  While maintaining the at-your-fingertips functionality that our clients know and love, the innovation found within these upgrades creates an even more intuitive environment. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Highlights of these enhancements include:&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Intuitive Navigation&lt;/strong&gt; – We have reduced the number of clicks required to find information, ultimately saving clients time, and introduced a comprehensive “My Settings” feature.  Also, pages will now dynamically refresh when different company divisions are selected.&lt;br /&gt;
     &lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Case Details&lt;/strong&gt; – More robust search capabilities have been added along with a single navigation to find active and completed cases.  Specific immigration case details appear logically when utilizing the Question &amp; Answer (Q&amp;A) and Alerts sections. In the Documents and Forms &amp; Letters section, we more clearly identify the responsible party.&lt;br /&gt;
     &lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Resource Center&lt;/strong&gt; – Our one of a kind online Q&amp;A, real-time Alerts, and high-level Customer Support will now be combined into a one-stop section, offering clients enhanced access to do business with our immigration experts 24x7.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Details related to client cases are showcased with an exciting new design, highlighting the expansive functionality and information provided by our technology. These new helpful features build upon our leading immigration and employment solutions platform, delivering an even more satisfying system for our clients and foreign nationals.  VISANOW is tomorrow’s solution for today’s global immigration &amp; I-9 compliance services! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please &lt;a href="http://www.visanow.com/Contact-Us.aspx"&gt;contact VISANOW&lt;/a&gt; for questions about our system enhancements or to learn how integrating our knowledge-based technology will lead to the ultimate client experience for all of your immigration and employment eligibility needs.  You can follow VISANOW through our social networking outlets, &lt;a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/VISANOW-Global-Immigration/280675068957?v=wall"&gt;Facebook&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://twitter.com/VISANOW"&gt;Twitter,&lt;/a&gt; for real-time announcements of future system enhancements and immigration industry news.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Photo attribution: &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/dreamactivistorg/"&gt;www.visanow.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/449/Another-VISANOW-Enhancement-Intuitive-Navigation-Case-Details-and-Resource-Center.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/449/Another-VISANOW-Enhancement-Intuitive-Navigation-Case-Details-and-Resource-Center.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/449/Another-VISANOW-Enhancement-Intuitive-Navigation-Case-Details-and-Resource-Center.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2011 18:41:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=449</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>June 2011 Visa Bulletin</title>
      <link>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/448/June-2011-Visa-Bulletin.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt="naturalization" style="float: left" src="/Portals/16/media/VB image.jpg" /&gt;Despite May’s reluctance to shine through in terms of weather, it certainly has provided significant progression for June’s immigration queues. June’s Visa Bulletin displays promising developments in priority dates for family-based and employment-based I-140’s for all categories.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Encouragingly, June’s Visa Bulletin for Employment Based I-140’s depicts similar progressions with the EB-1 category remaining current. EB-2’s in China and India will both inch forward, bringing both of their priority dates to 10/15/2006. The EB-3 “other workers” category seems more lethargic, with only Mexico showing any real momentum, skyrocketing seven months ahead to 12/22/2004. India only hastens forward seven days to 04/22/2002 while China remains the same. The Philippines and all other countries experienced a lag, both moving back seven days to 09/15/2005.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the Other Worker category, China stands still at 04/22/2003 while India makes seven days of headway to 04/22/2002. Mexico, The Philippines, and all other countries forge forward two months to 11/08/2003.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All other EB categories remain current.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In regards to family-based, the F-1 category, unmarried children over 21 of U.S. citizens, mostly holds its ground with only the Philippines skipping ahead six months, placing the current priority date at 02/22/1996. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The F-2A category for spouses and unmarried children under 21 of lawful permanent residents exhibits progress across the board with Mexico advancing five months to 06/22/2007, China, The Philippines, India, and all other countries moving ahead two months to 08/22/2007.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While the F-3, or unmarried children of U.S. citizens category seems to be stuck in neutral, the priority date F-4’s in China have moved up two months to 05/08/2000 and one month for the Philippines to 05/01/1988.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt="naturalization" style="float: left" src="/Portals/16/media/vbjune11.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="clear: both"&gt; Legend&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;C = current as there is no waiting period necessary to file for permanent residency&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;U = unavailable as visa supply has been exhausted for the remainder of fiscal year, or legislation creating the category has expired&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Date indicated = cut-off date that indicates a backlog; if the priority date (date the labor certification or I-140 was filed, depending on the type of case) is BEFORE the date listed, one may apply for permanent residency&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Employment-Based Preferences&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;First: Priority Workers&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Second:  Members of the Professions Holding Advanced Degrees or Persons of Exceptional Ability&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Third:  Skilled Workers, Professionals, and Other Workers&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Fourth:  Certain Special Immigrants&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Fifth:  Employment Creation&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a&gt;&lt;img alt="naturalization" style="float: left" src="http://www.visanow.com/Portals/16/media/vbfjune11.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="clear: both"&gt; Legend&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;C = current as there is no waiting period necessary to file for permanent residency&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;U = unavailable as visa supply has been exhausted for the remainder of fiscal year, or legislation creating the category has expired&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Date indicated = cut-off date that indicates a backlog; if the priority date (date the I-130 was filed) is BEFORE the date listed, one may apply for permanent residency&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Family-Based Preferences&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;First: Unmarried sons and daughters (i.e., children over 21 years of age) of U.S. citizens&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;2A:  Spouses and children (i.e., unmarried children under 21 years of age) of lawful permanent residents&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;2B:  Unmarried sons and daughters (i.e., children over 21 years of age) of lawful permanent residents&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Third:  Married sons and daughters of U.S. citizens&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Fourth:  Brothers and sisters of U.S. citizens&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Photo attribution: http://www.flickr.com/photos/8042373@N03/&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="color: #ffffff"&gt; VISANOW&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/448/June-2011-Visa-Bulletin.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/448/June-2011-Visa-Bulletin.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/448/June-2011-Visa-Bulletin.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 21:17:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=448</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dispelling DREAM Act Misconceptions </title>
      <link>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/447/Dispelling-DREAM-Act-Misconceptions.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt="Dreamact" align="left" src="/Portals/16/media/Dreamact.jpg" /&gt;Undocumented students, who were brought to the U.S. as young children quickly realize their options for the future are very limited upon high school graduation (about 65,000 every year). Under the current immigration law, these students have no legal way to pursue a college education or a career in the military. Earlier this month, President Obama once again reaffirmed his intention to pursue comprehensive immigration reform (CIR), which includes the Development Relief and Education for Alien Minors (&lt;a href="http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/174/Rejuventating-the-DREAM-Act.aspx"&gt;DREAM&lt;/a&gt;) Act to provide a path for these undocumented students earn legal status. &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The DREAM Act, first introduced in 2009, is still riddled with misconceptions such as the bill granting amnesty or will be a financial burden. Once dispelled, these two myths reveal that the intention of the DREAM Act is not to grant amnesty to millions of undocumented immigrants, but to provide a future for these students and pathway to develop into constructive members of society.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the main concerns expressed by many is whether or not the DREAM Act is a form of amnesty, which is defined as “the act of an authority (as a government) by which pardon is granted to a large group of individuals” (Merriam-Webster). The Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA) of 1986 granted amnesty to undocumented immigrants, had much more forgiving requirements, and offered a more direct path to legalization.  IRCA applied to any one that had entered the U.S. before 1982, had continuously resided in the U.S. since that date; and those who applied to adjust their status within the allotted time (12 months).  On the other hand the applicants for the DREAM Act would have to endure a much more rigorous process and fulfill these specific requirements; applicants must have entered the U.S. before they were 16 years old, have resided here continuously for 5 years, have graduated from high school or received a GED, and have demonstrated good moral character by not committing any inadmissible crimes.  If their first petition is approved their status is only granted initially on a conditional basis.  In order to adjust their status to permanent residency, the applicant must maintain his or her conditional residency for 6 years, have attended college for at least 2 years or attended the military, and pass another criminal background check.  If the applicant is unable to fulfill these requirements then they will lose their legal status.  Thus, the DREAM Act is not amnesty, because to it does not immediately grant permanent legal status – it has to be earned.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fear of this bill adding another financial burden to the American public has also resulted in criticism.  However, the DREAM Act would have substantial benefits not only for the immigrants themselves, but for the country as a whole.  In order for the U.S. to remain competitive in today’s global market, we need to ensure that educational opportunities are available and our youth are able to increase their opportunities.  As of right now, after high school, undocumented students are greatly limited in their options. According to the White House’s blog &lt;a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2010/12/01/get-facts-dream-act"&gt;Get The Facts On The DREAM Act&lt;/a&gt;, students impacted by the DREAM Act, would collectively contribute $2.3 billion to the government revenue, decrease the government deficit by $1.4 billion over the next 10 years, and add $1.4 to $3.6 trillion dollars in taxable income to our economy and potentially decrease the burden on social services as well. Also, tax payers need not worry about having to fund the educational expense for undocumented students since they would only qualify to receive federal loans that would require repayment.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Photo attribution: &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/dreamactivistorg/"&gt;http://www.flickr.com/photos/dreamactivistorg/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/447/Dispelling-DREAM-Act-Misconceptions.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/447/Dispelling-DREAM-Act-Misconceptions.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/447/Dispelling-DREAM-Act-Misconceptions.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 16:02:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=447</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>H-1B Cap Count as of 5/20/2011</title>
      <link>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/446/H-1B-Cap-Count-as-of-5-20-2011.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt="" align="left" src="/Portals/16/media/exclaimation mark.jpg" /&gt;The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) released H-1B cap numbers as of 5/20, receiving&lt;strong&gt; 12,300&lt;/strong&gt; toward the 65,000 cap-subject H-1B petitions and &lt;strong&gt;8,500 &lt;/strong&gt;towards the 20,000 H-1B Master's category.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thus, H-1B cap numbers remain available, and there is still time to submit your FY2012 H-1B visa application for foreign national applicants beginning employment on October 1, 2011 or later.  &lt;a href="http://www.visanow.com/Contact-Us.aspx"&gt;Contact VISANOW&lt;/a&gt; to see if this is an option for you/your foreign national.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;VISANOW will be blogging regular updates on the H-1B cap in addition to notifying our social media followers of real-time information through &lt;a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/VISANOW-Global-Immigration/280675068957?v=wall"&gt;Facebook&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://twitter.com/VISANOW"&gt;Twitter&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Photo attribution: http://www.flickr.com/photos/8042373@N03/&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/446/H-1B-Cap-Count-as-of-5-20-2011.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/446/H-1B-Cap-Count-as-of-5-20-2011.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/446/H-1B-Cap-Count-as-of-5-20-2011.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 14:39:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=446</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New E-Verify and Immigration Requirements in Georgia</title>
      <link>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/445/New-E-Verify-and-Immigration-Requirements-in-Georgia.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt="" align="left" src="/Portals/16/media/peaches.jpg" /&gt;Georgia passed an immigration reform bill entitled “Illegal Immigration Reform and Enforcement Act,” otherwise known as &lt;a href="http://www.legis.ga.gov/Legislation/en-US/display.aspx?Legislation=32190"&gt;HB 87&lt;/a&gt; on May 17.  Similar to tough immigration laws in Utah and &lt;a href="http://www.azleg.gov/legtext/47leg/2r/laws/0324.htm"&gt;Arizona’s SB 1070&lt;/a&gt;, Georgia is one of the many &lt;a href="http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/437/One-Year-after-S-B-1070-A-Look-at-Where-Statewide-Immigration-Stands.aspx"&gt;states taking immigration reform into their own hands in lieu of federal reform &lt;/a&gt;to combat illegal immigrants (according to the Pew Hispanic Center, Georgia has about 425,000 illegal immigrants and is the seventh-highest among the states).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;HB 87 will significantly impact employers and Georgian residents. Beginning July 1, HB 87 will require employers to verify the work status of employees by using E-Verify, an employment verification system operated by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Social Security Administration (SSA). It will also allow local law enforcement to check immigration status if suspected to be in this country illegally. While the controversial immigration legislation bills have been halted in both Utah and Arizona, Governor Nathan Deal believes that HB 87 will avoid the many pitfalls that have been alleged to exist in Arizona's legislation thanks to the diligence and hard work of Georgia’s General Assembly. Critics believe this law will thwart migrant workers and tourists from coming to Georgia, which may in turn hurt their economy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On July 1, the following regulations will go into effect:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Local and state police will be empowered to arrest illegal immigrants and take them to state and federal jails.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Employees who use fake identification to get a job in Georgia could face up to 15 years in prison and up to $250,000 in fines.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;People who -- while committing another crime -- knowingly transport or harbor illegal immigrants or encourage them to come to Georgia could face penalties. First-time offenders would face imprisonment for up to 12 months and up to $1,000 in fines.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;A seven-member Immigration Enforcement Review Board will be established to investigate complaints about local and state government officials not enforcing state immigration-related laws.Government officials who violate state laws requiring cities, counties and state government agencies to use E-Verify could face fines up to $10,000 and removal from office.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;The state Agriculture Department will be directed to study the possibility of creating Georgia's own guest-worker program. Some Georgia employers have complained the federal government's guest-worker program is too burdensome and expensive.&lt;br /&gt;
     &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The requirement for all employers to use E-Verify will be phased in. Employers with 500+ employees will be required to use E-Verify for new hires beginning January 1, 2012. Employers with 100-500 employees must begin using E-Verify on July 1, 2012, and businesses with 10-100 employees must begin using E-verify as of July 1, 2013.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;VISANOW will be blogging about the impact HB 87 has on Georgia in addition to notifying our social media followers of similiar information through &lt;a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/VISANOW-Global-Immigration/280675068957?v=wall"&gt;Facebook&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://twitter.com/VISANOW"&gt;Twitter&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Photo attribution: &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/hculligan/"&gt;http://www.flickr.com/photos/hculligan/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/445/New-E-Verify-and-Immigration-Requirements-in-Georgia.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/445/New-E-Verify-and-Immigration-Requirements-in-Georgia.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/445/New-E-Verify-and-Immigration-Requirements-in-Georgia.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 16:29:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=445</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Share your Immigration Story to Win a Visa Consultation and $100  </title>
      <link>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/444/Share-your-Immigration-Story-to-Win-a-Visa-Consultation-and-100.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt="" align="left" src="/Portals/16/media/visacard.jpg" /&gt;An immigrant from Morocco, Alla Eddine Janjary, has been dealing with the USCIS as his visa moves through untold bureaucracy for the last four years.  Alla had been legally working in the U.S., living alongside his documented wife and son, until his visa expired. Now uncertain of his future Alla has been dealing with the confusion and complexity of the U.S. government and immigration process. It's experiences like Alla’s that illustrate the need for immigration reform. Alla's story is not only common but minor, compared to some who have been waiting decades for legal status.  For example, according to the 2010 U.S. Visa Bulletin, siblings of adult U.S. citizens from the Philippines can expect to wait 23 years!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;VISANOW continues to provide the support, legal expertise, and online technology to streamline the immigration process for HR and foreign nationals. Our goal is to make the process easier for everyone involved. To that end, we've partnered with &lt;a href="http://www.foxtranslate.com/"&gt;FoxTranslate&lt;/a&gt;, a company that specializes in the translation of immigration documents, to sponsor the &lt;em&gt;U.S. Immigration Nightmares Contest&lt;/em&gt;, bringing the challenges and frustrations of U.S. immigration to the forefront. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Share your story and win! &lt;/strong&gt;Through the end of this week, from May 16-May 20, we’ll be accepting immigration stories with a winner being chosen daily. Winners will receive a $100 gift card and a visa consultation with one of our immigration specialists! &lt;a href="http://www.foxtranslate.com/sweeps/extraordinary-immigration-stories"&gt;Share your experience here or pass this link along&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;VISANOW will be blogging about the winner of the contest in addition to notifying our social media followers through &lt;a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/VISANOW-Global-Immigration/280675068957?v=wall"&gt;Facebook&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://twitter.com/VISANOW"&gt;Twitter&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Photo attribution: &lt;a href="http://www.foxtranslate.com/sweeps/extraordinary-immigration-stories"&gt;http://www.foxtranslate.com/sweeps/extraordinary-immigration-stories&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/444/Share-your-Immigration-Story-to-Win-a-Visa-Consultation-and-100.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/444/Share-your-Immigration-Story-to-Win-a-Visa-Consultation-and-100.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/444/Share-your-Immigration-Story-to-Win-a-Visa-Consultation-and-100.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 22:37:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=444</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Schengen Visa Saga</title>
      <link>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/443/The-Schengen-Visa-Saga.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt="" align="left" src="/Portals/16/media/schengenvisa.jpg" /&gt;Initiated thirty-five years ago, the Schengen Visa is struggling to survive its greatest strain yet. The Schengen Visa enables travelers to freely cross borders between 15 participating countries, assuming that a migrant meets certain qualifications to enter. With the recent explosion of immigrants fleeing revolutions in Libya, Egypt, and Syria, the European Union (EU) is bombarded by refugees that the Schengen is unwilling to house, calling into question the effectiveness of EU immigration. Finally goaded into action, EU officials have been meeting since April to rewrite border and immigration policies. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Tensions developed between France and Italy after Italy granted immigrants who arrived before April 5th with temporary resident visas in the hopes of increasing stringency for more recently arriving Tunisian and Libyan refugees. Because the temporary resident status allows immigrants to travel freely within the Schengen, France found itself under a siege of itinerant immigrants, requiring its border controls to come out of retirement. Blaming Italy for the onslaught of new temporary residents, France’s aggression gave immediate reason for the EU to renegotiate its immigration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Created with the intention of fostering a connection between like-minded countries, the Schengen is now proving to be an immensely expensive endeavor. The EU had to create Frontex, an agency meant to preserve border control by entering countries, and according to recent agreements, “allow the Union to handle situations where either a member state is not fulfilling its obligations to control its section of the external border, or where a particular portion of the external border comes under unexpected and heavy pressure due to external events.” However, the new question is who will order these special operations?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hugo Brady, a senior research fellow from the Center of European Reform, favors the promise of a stricter policy and states: “we are surrounded by poorer but increasingly internationally mobile peoples who want in on societies boasting the highest quality of life in the world…It’s hard to see how we can deter that desire indefinitely.” However, what he fails to take into account is Europe’s urgency for foreign workers with specialized knowledge. The Union now faces the troubling task of setting legislation to appropriately sift through applications and discern how to reject a refugee seeking asylum and how to accept a foreign national with wanted knowledge.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;VISANOW will be blogging regular updates on any changes to the Schengen Visa in addition to notifying our social media followers of real-time information through &lt;a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/VISANOW-Global-Immigration/280675068957?v=wall"&gt;Facebook&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://twitter.com/VISANOW"&gt;Twitter&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Written by Abbas S. &lt;br /&gt;
Photo attribution: &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/32619092@N02/"&gt;http://www.flickr.com/photos/32619092@N02/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/443/The-Schengen-Visa-Saga.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/443/The-Schengen-Visa-Saga.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/443/The-Schengen-Visa-Saga.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 15:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=443</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>E-Verify Offers Spanish Version for Users</title>
      <link>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/442/E-Verify-Offers-Spanish-Version-for-Users.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt="" align="left" src="/Portals/16/media/everify.jpg" /&gt;Good news for the bloggers following VISANOW! The government branch, United States Citizens and Immigration Services (USCIS), now offers its “E-verify” service in Spanish! Please visit &lt;a href="http://www.uscis.gov/espanol/E-Verify"&gt;www.uscis.gov/espanol/E-Verify&lt;/a&gt; on their website to view important information available for employees and employers. In the future USCIS has plans to extend the services they offer in Spanish, so wait for more good news on our blog!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;En Español&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/strong&gt;¡Tenemos buenas noticias para los blogueros que siguen VISANOW! La organización gubernamental,  Servicios de Ciudadanía e inmigranción de Estados Unidos (USCIS) ahora ofrece el servicio de “E-verify” (verificación electrónica de documentos) en español. Por favor visite &lt;a href="http://www.uscis.gov/espanol/E-Verify"&gt;www.uscis.gov/espanol/E-Verify&lt;/a&gt;  para ver información importante para empleados y empleadores. En el futuro el USCIS tiene planes para aumentar los servicios que ofrece en español, asi que espere más buenas noticias en nuestro blog.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;VISANOW will be blogging regular updates on the E-Verify system in addition to notifying our social media followers of real-time information through &lt;a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/VISANOW-Global-Immigration/280675068957?v=wall"&gt;Facebook&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://twitter.com/VISANOW"&gt;Twitter&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Photo attribution: uscis.gov&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/442/E-Verify-Offers-Spanish-Version-for-Users.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/442/E-Verify-Offers-Spanish-Version-for-Users.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/442/E-Verify-Offers-Spanish-Version-for-Users.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 14:08:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=442</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>VISANOW CEO Robert Meltzer Receives Outstanding Alumni Award from Northern Illinois University</title>
      <link>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/441/VISANOW-CEO-Robert-Meltzer-Receives-Outstanding-Alumni-Award-from-Northern-Illinois-University.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt="" align="left" src="/Portals/16/media/bobaward.jpg" /&gt;On April 29, Mr. Meltzer was honored by receiving a distinguished award from Northern Illinois University at their annual Alumni Awards Dinner. During the ceremony, they gave a brief synopsis of Mr. Meltzer’s inspiring life, as well as the intriguing path he took to VISANOW.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After graduating from the University of Colorado-Boulder, having studied political science, Mr. Meltzer headed for the Prairie State to pursue his J.D. from NIU. After a few more years of burning the midnight oil, in 1985 NIU conferred his degree.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With degree in hand, Mr. Meltzer crossed the Atlantic, continuing his education in several European schools and kick-starting his career with a stay at the WHO legal office in Geneva. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After this illustrious beginning, the U.S. was lucky enough to have Mr. Meltzer return, and in 1986 he began legal work for immigration and international issues stateside. At one point, he stood before the Supreme Court on immigration law issues. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, as greatness so often proves, after fifteen years of law Mr. Meltzer was hungry for more. After the tech boom, he saw what an amazing influence technology could have on the immigration process, and so the company was born that we all now call home: VISANOW.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For ten years, we’ve provided immigration services online and on the cutting edge. This week, however, we got a pleasant reminder of our roots and our history. Congratulations, Mr. Meltzer.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/441/VISANOW-CEO-Robert-Meltzer-Receives-Outstanding-Alumni-Award-from-Northern-Illinois-University.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/441/VISANOW-CEO-Robert-Meltzer-Receives-Outstanding-Alumni-Award-from-Northern-Illinois-University.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/441/VISANOW-CEO-Robert-Meltzer-Receives-Outstanding-Alumni-Award-from-Northern-Illinois-University.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 16:36:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=441</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>H-1B Cap Count as of 4/22/2011</title>
      <link>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/440/H-1B-Cap-Count-as-of-4-22-2011.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt="" align="left" src="/Portals/16/media/exclaimation mark.jpg" /&gt;The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) released H-1B cap numbers as of 4/22, receiving &lt;strong&gt;8,000&lt;/strong&gt; toward the 65,000 cap-subject H-1B petitions and &lt;strong&gt;5,900 &lt;/strong&gt;towards the 20,000 H-1B Master's category.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thus, H-1B cap numbers remain available, and there is still time to submit your FY2012 H-1B visa application for foreign national applicants beginning employment on October 1, 2011 or later.  &lt;a href="http://www.visanow.com/Contact-Us.aspx"&gt;Contact VISANOW&lt;/a&gt; to see if this is an option for you/your foreign national.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;VISANOW will be blogging regular updates on the H-1B cap in addition to notifying our social media followers of real-time information through &lt;a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/VISANOW-Global-Immigration/280675068957?v=wall"&gt;Facebook&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://twitter.com/VISANOW"&gt;Twitter&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Photo attribution: http://www.flickr.com/photos/8042373@N03/&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/440/H-1B-Cap-Count-as-of-4-22-2011.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/440/H-1B-Cap-Count-as-of-4-22-2011.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/440/H-1B-Cap-Count-as-of-4-22-2011.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 15:25:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=440</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Sun Never Sets on the British Empire, But Only If You Have Visa</title>
      <link>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/439/The-Sun-Never-Sets-on-the-British-Empire-But-Only-If-You-Have-Visa.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt="" align="left" src="/Portals/16/media/noentry.jpg" /&gt;David Cameron, British Prime Minister, stands at the precipice of one of the most controversial decisions concerning UK immigration since the 1960’s. As the new coalition government leader, Cameron struggles with negotiating his inherent conservative politics with the Liberal Democrats’ views on immigration. In a speech given on April 14th concerning the progress of the new regime, David Cameron revealed his plan to reduce net migration “in the order of tens of thousands each year, not the hundreds of thousands every year that we have seen over the last decade". In doing so, he hopes to alleviate social tension within family neighborhoods, reduce the amount of fraudulent marriages, and free up more jobs for UK-born nationals.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Concerned with the growing discrepancy between those entering and those exiting, Cameron fears the loose lasso of previous administrations could have muddied the social waters. However, many find his cap bordering on extremism, especially within the coalition’s constraints. Amongst the most vocal is Vince Cable, Cameron’s Business Secretary and British Liberal Democrat. Cable calls the Prime Minister’s choice of words “very unwise” and asserts that “The reference to tens of thousands rather than hundreds of thousands of people is not part of coalition policy.” With only 20% of non-EU immigrants covered under the proposed cap and 5,000 employees recently displaced from the UK Border Agency, Vince Cable seems to accurately depict the country’s surprise despite his public and inappropriate reproach of the Prime Minister.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Immigration has been a tricky subject since 1962 when Parliament attempted to repeal the British Immigration Act (1948), which stated that any native of a British Isle or colony was eligible to full UK citizenship. Thus, post-WWII Britain was met with a surprising influx of new residents, creating the need for control. The immigration laws enacted between 1962 and 1978 tried to preserve the rights of individuals born in the UK versus those “lesser” rights of citizens from colonized countries. Over the past two decades, the government has vacillated between liberal acceptance and staunch conservative denial of the increase in immigration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The coalition government formed after the 2010 election and hopes to bridge the ever-widening gap between the Tories (Republicans) and the Liberal Democrats. Agreements were set and negotiated, establishing a programme, whose policy David Cameron finds himself dangerously close to skirting. However, with thirteen years of incongruous government resulting in a massive budget deficit, the government is firm on utilizing the coalition to reach a middle, and more productive ground. It is therefore unsurprising that there would be disagreement between cabinet members with differing politics, but hopefully these issues can be resolved behind closed doors in the future.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For more information on immigration changes or travel options in the UK, please &lt;a href="http://www.visanow.com/Contact-Us.aspx"&gt;contact VISANOW&lt;/a&gt;.  Timely updates on worldwide immigration alerts can be found on VISANOW’s blog and our other social media outlets, &lt;a href="http://twitter.com/VISANOW"&gt;Twitter&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/VISANOW-Global-Immigration/280675068957?v=wall"&gt;Facebook&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://www.linkedin.com/company/visanow"&gt;LinkedIn&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Written by:  Abbas S.&lt;br /&gt;
Photo attribution: &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/30903003@N04/"&gt;http://www.flickr.com/photos/30903003@N04/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/439/The-Sun-Never-Sets-on-the-British-Empire-But-Only-If-You-Have-Visa.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/439/The-Sun-Never-Sets-on-the-British-Empire-But-Only-If-You-Have-Visa.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/439/The-Sun-Never-Sets-on-the-British-Empire-But-Only-If-You-Have-Visa.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 20:48:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=439</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>May 2011 Visa Bulletin</title>
      <link>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/438/May-2011-Visa-Bulletin.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt="naturalization" style="float: left" src="/Portals/16/media/VB image.jpg" /&gt;Nothing can stop the steady flow of time, and with another month comes another Visa Bulletin. Yet, with time comes progress, and progress seemed to be the theme of Visa Bulletin for May 2011. More so than the family-based categories, the employment-based categories showed promising increases.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Notably, the priority date for Indian nationals in the EB second category finally improved. The priority date for EB-2 Indian nationals had held fast at 05/08/2006 since the September 2010 Visa Bulletin, but May 2011 brought a momentum change for the category as it bustled forward two months to 07/01/2006. The EB-2 category for China moved forward, too, albeit only by ten days.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;All of the EB-3 categories also inched on in a promising direction, however, the EB third category for Indian nationals just barely improved.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;ul&gt;
        &lt;li&gt;India moved ahead one week to 04/15/2002.&lt;/li&gt;
        &lt;li&gt;China advanced over one month to 04/15/2004.&lt;/li&gt;
        &lt;li&gt;Mexico leaped forward four months to 09/08/2004.&lt;/li&gt;
        &lt;li&gt;All other countries, including the Philippines, progressed to 08/22/2005.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;/ul&gt;
    &lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;In the EB third “other workers” category, all countries except for China and India strode forward one and half months to 09/08/2003. India, however, only moved forward one week to 04/15/2002, while China stalled at 04/22/2003. China has remained at 04/22/2003 in this category since September 2010. &lt;br /&gt;
     &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Switching gears from the employment to family-based, the May 2011 Visa Bulletin provided a slow but steady trickle of progress for many of these categories. Additionally, this month’s bulletin showed no further retrogression in any of the categories. Yet, there were still quite a few categories which remained deadlocked in their priority dates, showing no progress as the government continues to struggle with the demanding amount of applications received relative to available visa numbers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;In the FB first preference category for the unmarried children over 21 of U.S. citizens, all countries remained the same except for Mexico, which progressed one month two weeks to 03/01/1993, and the Philippines, which jumped three and one half months to 07/15/1995.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;In the FB-2A preference category for the spouses and unmarried children under 21 of lawful permanent residents, every country exhibited improvement. All countries went from 04/01/2007 to 06/08/2007, except for Mexico which jolted forward six months from 07/01/2006 to 01/01/2007.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Like the FB-1 category, The FB-2B preference category for the unmarried children over 21 of green card holders showed no improvement for any country with the exceptions of Mexico and the Philippines. Mexico went from 07/15/1992 to 08/01/1992, while the Philippines went from 12/01/1999 to 03/01/2000.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;The FB-3 preference category for the married children of U.S. citizens, though, saw improvement in all categories. Mexico went from 11/08/1992 to 11/15/1992; the Philippines went from 01/01/1992 to 02/15/1992; and all other countries advanced from 03/15/2001 to 05/01/2001.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Finally, the FB-4 category, which is for the siblings of U.S. citizens, showed only slight increases, but increases nonetheless. All countries progressed one month, except for India which showed an improvement of just two weeks.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt="naturalization" style="float: left" src="/Portals/16/media/vbmay11.png" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="clear: both"&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Legend&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;C = current as there is no waiting period necessary to file for permanent residency&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;U = unavailable as visa supply has been exhausted for the remainder of fiscal year, or legislation creating the category has expired&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Date indicated = cut-off date that indicates a backlog; if the priority date (date the labor certification or I-140 was filed, depending on the type of case) is BEFORE the date listed, one may apply for permanent residency&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Employment-Based Preferences&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;First: Priority Workers&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Second:  Members of the Professions Holding Advanced Degrees or Persons of Exceptional Ability&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Third:  Skilled Workers, Professionals, and Other Workers&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Fourth:  Certain Special Immigrants&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Fifth:  Employment Creation&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a&gt;&lt;img alt="naturalization" style="float: left" src="http://www.visanow.com/Portals/16/media/vbfmay11.png" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="clear: both"&gt; Legend&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;C = current as there is no waiting period necessary to file for permanent residency&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;U = unavailable as visa supply has been exhausted for the remainder of fiscal year, or legislation creating the category has expired&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Date indicated = cut-off date that indicates a backlog; if the priority date (date the I-130 was filed) is BEFORE the date listed, one may apply for permanent residency&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Family-Based Preferences&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;First: Unmarried sons and daughters (i.e., children over 21 years of age) of U.S. citizens&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;2A:  Spouses and children (i.e., unmarried children under 21 years of age) of lawful permanent residents&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;2B:  Unmarried sons and daughters (i.e., children over 21 years of age) of lawful permanent residents&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Third:  Married sons and daughters of U.S. citizens&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Fourth:  Brothers and sisters of U.S. citizens&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Photo attribution: http://www.flickr.com/photos/8042373@N03/&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="color: #ffffff"&gt; VISANOW&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/438/May-2011-Visa-Bulletin.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/438/May-2011-Visa-Bulletin.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/438/May-2011-Visa-Bulletin.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 21:48:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=438</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>One Year after S.B. 1070 – A Look at Where Statewide Immigration Stands </title>
      <link>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/437/One-Year-after-S-B-1070-A-Look-at-Where-Statewide-Immigration-Stands.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt="" align="left" src="/Portals/16/media/statelaw.jpg" /&gt;Almost one year has gone by since Arizona passed the most controversial statewide immigration law in history, sparking debate across the country.   The nation watched as Arizona’s injured reputation upset businesses and tourism, while the state entered into a legal battle with the Federal government to determine if the new laws are constitutionally sound.  To say that S.B. 1070 paved the way for statewide immigration legislation is erroneous, yet the “Arizona-style” approach has been repeated in other immigration bills introduced since the adoption of S.B. 1070.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The trend of statewide immigration policy may have snowballed from the onset of S.B. 1070, but the frustration began with the Obama administration’s and Congress’s inability to find a comprehensive immigration solution by focusing on employer enforcement.  State lawmakers have made it clear that they are willing to take matters into their own hands - in many cases contesting the constitution.  As it stands today, &lt;a href="http://www.nilc.org/immlawpolicy/LocalLaw/Threat-levels-map-4-14-11.pdf"&gt;24 states&lt;/a&gt; have introduced statewide immigration laws according to the National Immigration Law Center, with Utah, Arizona, and Georgia’s policies being the most influential.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Utah&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/strong&gt;In an effort to find middle ground on controlling immigration, Governor Gary Herbert signed four bills into law March 15. The new laws in Utah include police validation of immigrant status, a guest-worker program, a migrant worker agreement between Utah and the Mexican state of Nuevo Leon, and an amendment allowing Utah citizens to sponsor immigrants. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Arizona&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/strong&gt;The toughest ongoing statewide immigration legislation faced more obstacles last week as a federal appeals court voted to continue blocking certain provisions of Arizona’s S.B. 1070, pending results of the continued federal lawsuit.  The blocked provision would have allowed police to examine immigrant status of anyone detained, required immigrants to carry identification papers, and made it illegal for undocumented citizens to work in a public setting. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Georgia&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/strong&gt;A law has yet to be signed in Georgia, but this week Georgia’s state senate passed a statewide “Arizona-style” immigration bill.  Governor Nathan Deal was quoted saying he is prepared to sign the bill in hopes of combating the price tag illegal immigration puts on his state. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Over half the U.S. has passed additional legislation to further shape E-Verify laws, an employment eligibility verification system required on a federal level but also available to all 50 states.  In most cases, efforts to control immigration on a local level are increasing awareness and sparking national debate.  Regardless if more bills ever make it to signing, state officials anticipate their efforts serving as a model for the nation’s immigration solution, or, at the very least, put pressure on the administration to move along comprehensive immigration reform once and for all.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
For more information on statewide immigration laws or E-Verify regulations, please &lt;a href="http://www.visanow.com/Contact-Us.aspx"&gt;contact VISANOW&lt;/a&gt;.  Timely updates on legislation can be found on VISANOW’s blog or our other social media outlets, &lt;a href="http://twitter.com/VISANOW"&gt;Twitter&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/VISANOW-Global-Immigration/280675068957?v=wall"&gt;Facebook&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Written by: Stephanie O. &lt;br /&gt;
Photo attribution: &lt;a href="http://www.nilc.org/"&gt;http://www.nilc.org/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/437/One-Year-after-S-B-1070-A-Look-at-Where-Statewide-Immigration-Stands.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/437/One-Year-after-S-B-1070-A-Look-at-Where-Statewide-Immigration-Stands.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/437/One-Year-after-S-B-1070-A-Look-at-Where-Statewide-Immigration-Stands.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 15:25:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=437</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>U.S. Embassy in Japan Updates Travel Alert</title>
      <link>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/436/U-S-Embassy-in-Japan-Updates-Travel-Alert.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt="" align="left" src="/Portals/16/media/usembassy.jpg" /&gt;On Friday, April 15, the U.S. Embassy in Japan replaced their previously issued Travel Warning with an &lt;a href="http://japan.usembassy.gov/e/acs/tacs-alert20110415.html"&gt;updated Travel Alert&lt;/a&gt;, affirming that health and safety risks outside the 50-mile evacuation zone of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant are low and do not significantly threaten the well-being of U.S. citizens.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The analysis is said to have considered all age groups as well as the long-term effects the surrounding area may pose.  The overall condition of the plant, while still serious, has dramatically improved and restored most of the cooling, power, water and back up services.  U.S. scientists stationed in Japan have verified the alerts reflect protocol that would be taken in the United States in a similar situation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Voluntary Authorized Departure, imposed by the Department of State, has now been lifted to allow dependents of U.S. government employees to return to Japan.  The U.S. Embassy still advises that U.S. citizens do not travel or reside within a 50-mile radius of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant until further notice. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This travel Alert expires on June 15, 2011.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For more information on immigration issues or travel options in Japan, please &lt;a href="http://www.visanow.com/Contact-Us.aspx"&gt;contact VISANOW&lt;/a&gt;.  Timely updates on worldwide immigration alerts can be found on VISANOW’s blog or our other social media outlets, &lt;a href="http://twitter.com/VISANOW"&gt;Twitter&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/VISANOW-Global-Immigration/280675068957?v=wall"&gt;Facebook&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Photo attribution: &lt;a href="http://www.usembassy.gov/"&gt;http://www.usembassy.gov/&lt;/a&gt;#&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/436/U-S-Embassy-in-Japan-Updates-Travel-Alert.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/436/U-S-Embassy-in-Japan-Updates-Travel-Alert.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/436/U-S-Embassy-in-Japan-Updates-Travel-Alert.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 17:40:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=436</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>First H-1B Cap Count for FY2012 Employment</title>
      <link>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/435/First-H-1B-Cap-Count-for-FY2012-Employment.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt="" align="left" src="/Portals/16/media/exclaimation mark.jpg" /&gt;The first H-1B cap count for the 2012 employment season was released Thursday, April 7, despite scares of a government shutdown.  The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) reported receiving 5,900 toward the 65,000 regular cap-subject H-1B petitions and 4,500 towards the 20,000 H-1B Master's category.   While these initial counts represent a decrease from last year’s standings, data suggests that the ongoing increases in hiring will contribute to a rising cap.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thus, H-1B cap numbers remain available, and there is still time to submit your FY2012 H-1B visa application for foreign national applicants beginning employment on October 1, 2011 or later.  &lt;a href="http://www.visanow.com/Contact-Us.aspx"&gt;Contact VISANOW&lt;/a&gt; to see if this is an option for you/your foreign national.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;VISANOW will be blogging regular updates on the H-1B cap in addition to notifying our social media followers of real-time information through &lt;a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/VISANOW-Global-Immigration/280675068957?v=wall"&gt;Facebook&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://twitter.com/VISANOW"&gt;Twitter&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Photo attribution: http://www.flickr.com/photos/8042373@N03/&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/435/First-H-1B-Cap-Count-for-FY2012-Employment.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/435/First-H-1B-Cap-Count-for-FY2012-Employment.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/435/First-H-1B-Cap-Count-for-FY2012-Employment.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 16:33:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=435</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Government Shutdown May Upset Immigration</title>
      <link>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/434/Government-Shutdown-May-Upset-Immigration.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img border="0" alt="webcast immigration" align="left" src="/Portals/16/media/closed.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One might think that with the looming threat of a government shutdown, panic would have set in by now.  Hopefully, this composure is due, at least in part, to the trust we’ve put in elected officials, and not because of the general public's oblivion to the severity of a shutdown's consequences.  Tonight, Friday, April 6, marks the expiration of the federal budget, of which Congress continues relentless negotiation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The threat of a government shutdown opens the door to a good deal of uncertainty in the realm of immigration.  VISANOW Chief Executive Officer Robert Meltzer states, “The likelihood of immigration-related consequences cannot be ruled out.  Our concern is focused on service sectors such as the Department of Labor (DOL) and the Department of State (DOS), where delayed operations could result in the disruption of application processing, PERM and H-1B filings, labor condition applications and much more, accumulating a backlog for months or years to come.”   The shutdown could also potentially delay tourists and visa holders at certain entry points.  Therefore, anyone planning to leave the country that also requires a visa stamp to re-enter may want to delay travel until a solution has been reached.   The law states that the only government functions to remain open in the event of a shutdown are those that protect human life or property - a law most people interpret to mean that Customs and Border Protection will carry on. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The most recent series of government shutdowns occured in 1995 and 1996, with the most impact felt for only six days, but totaling approximately $800 million in lost taxpayer dollars.   Over 80,000 visas were delayed during the lapse; however other immigration-related functions of the government were not heavily affected.  For now, we can only speculate about the effect that a shutdown might have today, yet we’ll move forward hoping that our government keeps our best interests in mind. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
VISANOW is closely monitoring the government’s budget negotiations and will offer timely updates regarding its effects on immigration.  Please do not hesitate to &lt;a href="http://www.visanow.com/Contact-Us.aspx"&gt;contact us&lt;/a&gt; with questions regarding your employment or family-based immigration. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Written by: Stephanie O.&lt;br /&gt;
Photo attribution: &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/tommy-ironic/"&gt;http://www.flickr.com/photos/tommy-ironic/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/434/Government-Shutdown-May-Upset-Immigration.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/434/Government-Shutdown-May-Upset-Immigration.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/434/Government-Shutdown-May-Upset-Immigration.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 22:24:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=434</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Free Webcast: Increase Your Immigration Approval Rates While Reducing Hidden Costs</title>
      <link>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/433/Free-Webcast-Increase-Your-Immigration-Approval-Rates-While-Reducing-Hidden-Costs.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;img border="0" alt="webcast immigration" align="left" src="/Portals/16/media/webcast.jpg" /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is hiring on the rise at your company?  Are you concerned or overwhelmed with the immigration application process?  On Wednesday, April 13, 2011, VISANOW will host a free webinar conquering several of the immigration application challenges facing HR professionals today.  With H-1B season underway, foreign hiring is increasing and the employment of foreign nationals is already on the rise. With such limited time, HR professionals must ensure their immigration applications are approved the first time around to avoid the high costs associated with recruiting, the dreaded Request for Evidence (RFE) and government compliance visits. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.hr.com/en/webcasts_events/webcasts/upcoming_webcasts/increase-your-immigration-approval-rates-while-red_glcotabg.html?s=2eQOMGxdzqjkP0wfDa"&gt;Attend this webinar&lt;/a&gt; sponsored by VISANOW to ensure your immigration petitions are properly prepared from the start. Learn tangible strategies to minimize costs associated with the immigration application process and government issued delays (e.g. RFE’s). Take advantage of this opportunity to become your company's foreign hiring expert. Live Q&amp;A will follow the presentation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.hr.com/en/webcasts_events/webcasts/upcoming_webcasts/increase-your-immigration-approval-rates-while-red_glcotabg.html?s=2eQOMGxdzqjkP0wfDa"&gt;Increase Your Immigration Approval Rates While Reducing Hidden Costs&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/strong&gt;Wednesday, April 13, 2011&lt;br /&gt;
3:00 – 4:00 p.m. ET / 2:00 – 3:00 p.m. CT&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.hr.com/en/webcasts_events/webcasts/upcoming_webcasts/increase-your-immigration-approval-rates-while-red_glcotabg.html?s=2eQOMGxdzqjkP0wfDa"&gt;Register Now&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Who should attend?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Human Resource Generalists, Specialists or Managers&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Global Mobility / Immigration Specialists&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Employees responsible for recruiting, sourcing or talent acquisition looking to minimize time spent on immigration cases&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Technology focused recruiting or HR personnel&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Photo attribution: &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/njum/"&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;span&gt;http&lt;/span&gt;://&lt;span&gt;www&lt;/span&gt;.&lt;span&gt;flickr&lt;/span&gt;.com/photos/&lt;span&gt;njum&lt;/span&gt;/&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/433/Free-Webcast-Increase-Your-Immigration-Approval-Rates-While-Reducing-Hidden-Costs.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/433/Free-Webcast-Increase-Your-Immigration-Approval-Rates-While-Reducing-Hidden-Costs.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/433/Free-Webcast-Increase-Your-Immigration-Approval-Rates-While-Reducing-Hidden-Costs.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 15:46:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=433</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>April 2011 Visa Bulletin</title>
      <link>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/432/April-2011-Visa-Bulletin.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt="naturalization" style="float: left" src="/Portals/16/media/VB image.jpg" /&gt;The April 2011 Visa Bulletin shows continued movement forward for the employment-based immigration categories, while the family-based categories evidence the government’s inability to accurately forecast or address the continued increase in demand.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Almost all employment-based preference categories showed modest gains, continuing the encouraging trend of recent months: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;China was again the only country in the EB second preference category to progress, increasing by two weeks to 07/22/2006.  India remained in the same place it has been since September 2010, stalled at 05/08/2006.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;The EB third category again saw encouraging progression for all countries.
    &lt;ul&gt;
        &lt;li&gt;Mexico is again the greatest beneficiary, jumping ahead by eight months to 05/08/2004.&lt;/li&gt;
        &lt;li&gt;China advanced five weeks to 03/01/2004&lt;/li&gt;
        &lt;li&gt;India continued its consistent advancement, moving forward three weeks, to 04/08/2002.&lt;/li&gt;
        &lt;li&gt;All other countries, including the Philippines, moved forward by three months, to 07/22/2005.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;/ul&gt;
    &lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;The EB-3 category for “Other Workers” showed strong progress for some nations, with China being the only country remaining stalled.
    &lt;ul&gt;
        &lt;li&gt;Most countries, including Mexico and Philippines, advanced three weeks to 07/22/2003.&lt;/li&gt;
        &lt;li&gt;India again advanced three weeks, to 04/08/2002.&lt;/li&gt;
        &lt;li&gt;China showed no progress, remaining at 04/22/2003.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;/ul&gt;
    &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Contrasting sharply with the positive signs evidenced by the employment-based categories were the priority dates in the family-based categories, which were both more erratic and less encouraging. Some family-based categories retrogressed considerably, while others moved forward modestly or remained stalled.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;In the FB first preference category for the unmarried children over 21 of U.S. citizens, Mexico and the Philippines remained the only countries that saw advancements. Mexico advanced two weeks, to 02/15/1993, and the Philippines moves ahead three and half months, to 04/01/1995.  All other countries, however, including China and India, retrogressed a disappointing eight months, to 05/01/2004.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;The FB-2A preference category for the spouses and unmarried children under 21 of lawful permanent residents showed very positive improvements, turning around what had been a disappointing pattern of recent retrogression. Most countries, including China and India, advanced three months, to 04/01/2007.  The priority date for Mexico advanced six months, to 07/01/2006, while the Philippines advanced three months, to 04/01/2007. &lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;The FB-2B preference category for the unmarried children over 21 of green card remain largely unchanged, although some countries showed slight advancement.  The Dominican Republic, after seeing wild swings of retrogression and advancement in the prior two bulletins, advanced all the way to 04/15/2003. Priority dates for Filipino nationals moved ahead an impressive four months, to 12/01/1999. All other countries are stalled at 04/15/2003.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;The FB-3 preference category for the married children of U.S. citizens saw progress across the board.  Most countries advanced two and a half months, to 03/15/2001. Mexico advanced slightly, moving ahead one week to 11/08/1992.  Filipino nationals saw another moderate move forward, this time advancing three weeks to 01/01/1992.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;The FB-4 category, which is for the siblings of U.S. citizens, saw a one-month advancement to February 2000.  The Philippines advanced nearly two months, 03/08/1988, and Mexico moved ahead one week, to 02/01/1996.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt="naturalization" style="float: left" src="/Portals/16/media/vbapril11.png" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="clear: both"&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Legend&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;C = current as there is no waiting period necessary to file for permanent residency&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;U = unavailable as visa supply has been exhausted for the remainder of fiscal year, or legislation creating the category has expired&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Date indicated = cut-off date that indicates a backlog; if the priority date (date the labor certification or I-140 was filed, depending on the type of case) is BEFORE the date listed, one may apply for permanent residency&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Employment-Based Preferences&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;First: Priority Workers&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Second:  Members of the Professions Holding Advanced Degrees or Persons of Exceptional Ability&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Third:  Skilled Workers, Professionals, and Other Workers&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Fourth:  Certain Special Immigrants&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Fifth:  Employment Creation&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a&gt;&lt;img alt="naturalization" style="float: left" src="http://www.visanow.com/Portals/16/media/vbfapril11.png" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="clear: both"&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="clear: both"&gt;Legend&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;C = current as there is no waiting period necessary to file for permanent residency&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;U = unavailable as visa supply has been exhausted for the remainder of fiscal year, or legislation creating the category has expired&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Date indicated = cut-off date that indicates a backlog; if the priority date (date the I-130 was filed) is BEFORE the date listed, one may apply for permanent residency&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Family-Based Preferences&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;First: Unmarried sons and daughters (i.e., children over 21 years of age) of U.S. citizens&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;2A:  Spouses and children (i.e., unmarried children under 21 years of age) of lawful permanent residents&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;2B:  Unmarried sons and daughters (i.e., children over 21 years of age) of lawful permanent residents&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Third:  Married sons and daughters of U.S. citizens&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Fourth:  Brothers and sisters of U.S. citizens&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Photo attribution: http://www.flickr.com/photos/8042373@N03/&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="color: #ffffff"&gt; VISANOW&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/432/April-2011-Visa-Bulletin.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/432/April-2011-Visa-Bulletin.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/432/April-2011-Visa-Bulletin.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 23:47:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=432</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Arizona Rejects Additional Immigration Legislation</title>
      <link>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/431/Arizona-Rejects-Additional-Immigration-Legislation.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt="" align="left" src="/Portals/16/media/arizona-border.jpg" /&gt;Last week, Arizona rejected five anti-immigration bills in one day.  The new bills sought to end automatic citizenship for the newborns of illegal immigrants, require hospitals and schools to collect records on undocumented patients and students, and make it a crime for illegal immigrants to obtain a driver’s license.  This is a potential sign that Arizona’s “go-at-it-alone” approach in cracking down on illegal immigration is dwindling. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Why the recent rejection? The answer is, of course, money. Sixty chief executives petitioned to the Legislature stating “unintended consequences,” such as boycotts, lost jobs, canceled contracts, and bad publicity are causing businesses to suffer because of  the negative connotation with Arizona’s name.  Glenn Hamer, the chief executive of the Arizona’s Chamber of Commerce and Industry has stated that extremism has cost the state $15 million to $150 million in lost tourism revenue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;These recent bills are offshoots of Senate president, Russell Pearce, who was the chief sponsor of the controversial bill, SB1070, which requires police officers to check papers of anyone they suspect of being unauthorized. Last year the bill made Mr. Pearce a national figure, and his success prompted these recent follow-up bills.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While it seems as though Arizona businesses are feeling the effects of statewide immigration legislation, an end to SB1070 is questionable. None of the objections by Arizona’s businesses have anything to do with the strong moral arguments against anti-immigration bills. Currently, other state governments are considering Arizona’s model of enforcement, and unless businesses gain enough momentum to sway legislators, we will likely continue to see debate and possible adoption of Arizona-style regulations.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Photo attribution: &lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="widows: 2; text-transform: none; text-indent: 0px; border-collapse: separate; font: medium 'Times New Roman'; white-space: normal; orphans: 2; letter-spacing: normal; color: rgb(0,0,0); word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="text-align: left; line-height: 18px; font-family: Arial, sans-serif; color: rgb(35,31,32); font-size: 12px"&gt;http://www.flickr.com/photos/threadedthoughts/&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By: Adam R&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="color: #ffffff"&gt;VISANOW&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/431/Arizona-Rejects-Additional-Immigration-Legislation.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/431/Arizona-Rejects-Additional-Immigration-Legislation.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/431/Arizona-Rejects-Additional-Immigration-Legislation.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 22:44:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=431</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Immigration in the Wake of Disaster</title>
      <link>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/430/Immigration-in-the-Wake-of-Disaster.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt="" align="left" src="/Portals/16/media/japan.jpg" /&gt;When devastation strikes, people all over the world feel connected to tragedy - with families broken, homes and businesses destroyed and misfortune at an all-time high, the emotional rollercoaster continues long after the shock diminishes.  With immigration already topping the charts as a hot-button issue, pairing it with natural disaster often produces escalated reactions.   The role immigration plays in crisis mode depends heavily on the economic situation of the affected country as well as the magnitude of damage.   In light of the continued crisis provoked by Japan’s recent earthquake, many are asking why the U.S. is not stepping up efforts in terms of immigration relief similar to the programs organized for Haiti, such as &lt;a href="http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.eb1d4c2a3e5b9ac89243c6a7543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=848f7f2ef0745210VgnVCM100000082ca60aRCRD&amp;vgnextchannel=848f7f2ef0745210VgnVCM100000082ca60aRCRD"&gt;Temporary Protected Status (TPS)&lt;/a&gt;.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So far, the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has not granted TPS status to Japanese nationals, although they have extended other &lt;a href="http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=9c6ac337ab5ce210VgnVCM100000082ca60aRCRD&amp;vgnextchannel=6abe6d26d17df110VgnVCM1000004718190aRCRD"&gt;temporary relief measures&lt;/a&gt; to affected individuals.   For example, Japanese nationals in the U.S. under the Visa Waiver Program (VWP) can apply to have an additional 30 days without penalty to stay in the U.S. before returning to Japan.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TPS is a short-term form of protection issued to a country and its citizens when it is deemed unsafe to return to that country or in the event that the country cannot withstand the return of its citizens.  A country may be issued TPS status due to an ongoing armed conflict (i.e., civil war), an environmental disaster (i.e., earthquake) or other extraordinary and temporary conditions.   It’s unclear as to whether the government will eventually issue TPS for Japan, but most speculation and historical data suggests it will not. To compare the disaster in Japan with the situation in Haiti is not a level measurement; therefore equating relief efforts is also unrealistic.  For the U.S. to issue a TPS designation, they must consider Japan’s ability to recover from disaster, taking into account factors such as population, economic standing, and location, as well as the impact on the U.S. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/strong&gt;Though the death toll seems the most instinctive measure of the magnitude of a disaster, the measurement that likely carries more weight in terms of disaster relief lies within the &lt;em&gt;percentage&lt;/em&gt; of population affected.   Japan, a country with an estimated population of 127 million, is currently estimating 20,000 total deaths (and rising), whereas Haiti, a country of approximately 10 million, reached over 200,000 total casualties.  As catastrophic as both of those numbers are, the impact on Haiti is exponentially more severe.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Economic Standing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/strong&gt;Japan is one of the world leaders in terms of wealth; in fact, they have one of the most developed economies in world.  &lt;a href="http://www.housingwire.com/2011/03/23/japan-disaster-to-have-smaller-economic-impact-than-the-financial-crisis"&gt;Early economic analysis&lt;/a&gt; of the disaster is undoubtedly painful, but predicts Japan will overcome its loss in less time than it takes a country to rebound from a financial crisis.  While the damage is still being calculated, Japan’s GDP (30 times higher than Haiti’s) and constant prosperity provide an optimistic outlook for recovery.   Haiti, on the other hand, as one of the nation’s poorest and most underdeveloped countries, has a weak forecast for any long-term economic stability at all, even one year post-tragedy.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Geographical Scope&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/strong&gt;Through TPS designation and other immigration relief, the U.S. regulates the number of individuals receiving immigration benefits in order to ration the impact felt by the U.S.  Japan’s distance from the U.S. makes it unlikely that Japanese nationals will consider it a first option of refuge ahead of China, Korea or other border countries.  However, with Haiti as a neighbor to U.S. soil, it’s logical that additional precautions were taken in order to balance providing aid with monitoring the entry of Haitian citizens.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Over the next several months and years, Japan will receive support from countries all over the world, including the United States, to help in their recovery efforts.  If the U.S. chooses not to grant TPS to Japanese nationals, it is likely because Japan has demonstrated preparedness to withstand national disasters and the accompanying immigration matters.  Meanwhile, other forms of immigration support will continue and perhaps be extended to accommodate those affected by Japan’s misfortune.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Written by: Stephanie O. &lt;br /&gt;
Photo attribution: &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/hikarukazushime/"&gt;http://www.flickr.com/photos/hikarukazushime/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="color: #ffffff"&gt;VISANOW&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/430/Immigration-in-the-Wake-of-Disaster.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/430/Immigration-in-the-Wake-of-Disaster.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/430/Immigration-in-the-Wake-of-Disaster.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 21:02:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=430</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>USCIS:  H-1B Petitions for FY 2012 to be Accepted on April 1, 2011</title>
      <link>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/429/USCIS-H-1B-Petitions-for-FY-2012-to-be-Accepted-on-April-1-2011.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt="" align="left" src="/Portals/16/media/exclaimation mark.jpg" /&gt;An &lt;a href="http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=1b1a5c14988de210VgnVCM100000082ca60aRCRD&amp;vgnextchannel=c94e6d26d17df110VgnVCM1000004718190aRCRD"&gt;official announcement from the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS)&lt;/a&gt; was released today stating that H-1B petitions for fiscal year (FY) 2012 will be accepted starting April 1, 2011.  Cases are accepted on a first come first served basis, according to the date the USCIS physically receives a complete petition and the respective payment (not the postmarked date) until the cap has been met.   The allotted limit or regular cap for FY 2012 H-1B petitions is set at 65,000.  An additional 20,000 H-1B petitions exist for individuals with U.S. master’s degrees or higher.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The USCIS monitors the influx of H-1B petitions and posts regular updates of the current cap count for the public.  A separate notification is issued once the cap has been reached.  If the USCIS receives more petitions than permitted, they may randomly determine an amount of petitions that will be included in the cap and therefore reject petitions that are not selected or submitted after the cap is met. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The H-1B program is used by employers to hire foreign workers with highly specialized knowledge for positions that require theoretical or technical expertise, such as (but not limited to) scientists, mathematicians, computer programmers or engineers.  To avoid delays in processing and requests for evidence (RFE), the USCIS stresses the importance of following all guidelines when preparing H-1B petitions.   VISANOW recommends attending our upcoming webinar, &lt;a href="http://www.hr.com/stories/1300306325884"&gt;Increase Your Immigration Approval Rates While Lowering Hidden Costs&lt;/a&gt;, which will cover petition preparation and eluding government delays.   &lt;a href="http://www.visanow.com/Contact-Us.aspx"&gt;Contact VISANOW&lt;/a&gt; with any other H-1B related questions or to &lt;a href="http://www.visanow.com/resources/apply.aspx"&gt;start your H-1B petition today&lt;/a&gt;!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Photo attribution: http://www.flickr.com/photos/8042373@N03/&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/429/USCIS-H-1B-Petitions-for-FY-2012-to-be-Accepted-on-April-1-2011.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/429/USCIS-H-1B-Petitions-for-FY-2012-to-be-Accepted-on-April-1-2011.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/429/USCIS-H-1B-Petitions-for-FY-2012-to-be-Accepted-on-April-1-2011.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 23:24:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=429</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Immigration Struggles Facing Silicon Valley</title>
      <link>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/428/Immigration-Struggles-Facing-Silicon-Valley.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img border="0" alt="Webstat E-Verify report" align="left" src="/Portals/16/media//silicon.jpg" /&gt;Known as the mecca for innovation, Silicon Valley is no stranger to media headlines, lately however this technology community has drawn attention to some immigration matters that are hindering the recruitment and longevity of talent.   Last week, NBC nightly news anchor Tom Brokaw visited Silicon Valley and reported on a number of successful entrepreneurs forced to leave the U.S. because of visa issues. &lt;a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3032619//vp/41896170#41896170"&gt;His story&lt;/a&gt; pointed out that historically, similar skilled immigrants have been responsible for several start-ups in Silicon Valley, creating thousands of jobs and improving economic stability in our country.   This week, over 60 CEO’s from Silicon Valley made their way to Washington D.C. to discuss the impact immigration limitations are having on our economy and what can be done to resolve it. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The executives’ presence in Washington is meant to address the myriad of challenges facing the technology industry, all of which directly impact the U.S. economy.  Part of their plan is to depict how increasing the H-1B visa cap, speeding up the green card process and offering long-term opportunities for foreign U.S. graduates will payoff for the U.S. in both the short and long term.   If we continue to deny advantages to highly educated and skilled immigrants, our country risks losing talent that we’ve already heavily invested in, giving our global competition fuel to outperform. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The U.S. currently offers “investor visa” options (EB-5) for skilled immigrants looking to build a business, yet with such stringent guidelines, true “start-ups” find it near impossible to meet the basic requirements.   A &lt;a href="http://startupvisa.files.wordpress.com/2010/02/dc-startup-visa-act-2-24-10.pdf"&gt;Startup Visa Bill &lt;/a&gt;has been proposed by Senators John Kerry (D-Mass.) and Richard Lugar (R-Ind.), meant to open the door to more entrepreneurs with more reasonable expectations, especially in regards to capital and equity financing.  Critics of the bill still believe the requirements are too unachievable based on some of the most successful start-ups like Facebook, Twitter, and Groupon who, upon introduction, only required a small fraction of the cost needed for this visa.  Nevertheless, by offering the right program for immigrant entrepreneurs, the U.S. has an opportunity to gain millions in investments from abroad, create thousands of new jobs and make the U.S. a viable competitor in many industries.    &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Photo attribution: &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/christianrondeau/"&gt;http://www.flickr.com/photos/christianrondeau/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="color: #ffffff"&gt;VISANOW&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/428/Immigration-Struggles-Facing-Silicon-Valley.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/428/Immigration-Struggles-Facing-Silicon-Valley.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/428/Immigration-Struggles-Facing-Silicon-Valley.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 19:21:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=428</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>H-1B Electronic Registration System Proposed </title>
      <link>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/427/H-1B-Electronic-Registration-System-Proposed.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img border="0" alt="Webstat E-Verify report" align="left" src="/Portals/16/media//keyboard.jpg" /&gt;Potential changes are in store for the H-1B application filing process, revealed in a &lt;a href="http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2011/pdf/2011-4731.pdf"&gt;proposed requirement&lt;/a&gt;, involving employers electronically registering their H-1B petitions prior to the official filing season which typically begins in April.   The USCIS’s goal is to reduce the mass filings that occur at start of each filing period, thereby reducing the number of rejections on behalf of the employer when the cap is quickly met.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If implemented, the new requirement could take effect for the FY 2013 H-1B cap filing season (no changes will be in place for FY 2012 beginning April 1, 2011).  The USCIS has pledged that the new requirement will drastically reduce employers’ time and expenses associated with the H-1B petition process by allowing them to pre-register for an opportunity to petition.  Based on the cap allowance, a specified number of registrations will be accepted to submit a full petition.  If what the USCIS says is true, the system has the ability to offer a sound solution to long-standing issue, especially if hiring continues to increase as it has been.  A 60-day &lt;a href="http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=b02864337c77e210VgnVCM100000082ca60aRCRD&amp;vgnextchannel=8a2f6d26d17df110VgnVCM1000004718190aRCRD"&gt;comment period&lt;/a&gt; is currently underway to solicit feedback from businesses and the general public on the proposed rule, which ends May 2, 2011.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electronic registration system would function by allowing a two-week window, likely in March, at which time employers submit identification information about both the petitioner and the foreign national; taking an estimated 30 minutes per applicant (a separate registration is required for each applicant).  As the H-1B season commences in April, USCIS would electronically notify employers of a registration, waitlist or negative status for each applicant, at which time all selected registrants will need to submit a completed H-1B petition.  However, an accepted registration does not automatically guarantee a petition approval, as the USCIS plans to over-compensate in preparation for denials, missed deadlines, etc.    &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Photo attribution: &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/prasan-naik/"&gt;http://www.flickr.com/photos/prasan-naik/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="color: #ffffff"&gt;VISANOW&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/427/H-1B-Electronic-Registration-System-Proposed.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/427/H-1B-Electronic-Registration-System-Proposed.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/427/H-1B-Electronic-Registration-System-Proposed.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 22:33:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=427</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Same-Sex Partners of U.S. Diplomats Gain Immigration Benefits</title>
      <link>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/426/Same-Sex-Partners-of-U-S-Diplomats-Gain-Immigration-Benefits.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img border="0" alt="Webstat E-Verify report" align="left" src="/Portals/16/media//pride.jpg" /&gt;The first major exception to U.S. immigration policy for same-sex couple went into effect last month.  The lightly publicized change only affects U.S. diplomats and their partners—under the new policy, foreign same-sex partners of U.S. diplomats are eligible for the J-1 Exchange Visitor visa, the same temporary visa granted to au pairs and visiting scholars.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Though this may not affect the vast majority of multinational same-sex couples in the U.S. (not everyone can be a diplomat!), as the only visa option available specifically to same-sex partners of U.S. citizens it is an important step toward extending immigration benefits to more people.  Interestingly enough, while same-sex partners of non-U.S. citizens may obtain temporary B-visas on the basis of their relationship, the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) does not currently give any recognition to same-sex partners of U.S. citizens. Since foreign same-sex partners are neither eligible for K-1 Fiancé(e) visas nor permanent residency (green cards), they must enter the U.S. based on their own merits—as tourists, students, employees of a sponsoring company, or asylum-seekers. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While 19 countries (including Australia, Canada, the UK, and many EU countries) currently allow same-sex partners to apply for dependent visas, temporary “partner” visas, and even permanent residence and/or citizenship, efforts to introduce similar legislation in the U.S. have failed.  The most recent attempt at changing current immigration policy was introduced on February 12th, 2009 as the Uniting American Families Act, a bill cosponsored by Representative Jerrold Nadler (D-NY) and Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT).  If passed, the bill would allow U.S citizens and permanent residents to sponsor permanent partners, including same-sex partners, for residency.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Photo attribution: &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/8lettersuk/"&gt;http://www.flickr.com/photos/8lettersuk/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/426/Same-Sex-Partners-of-U-S-Diplomats-Gain-Immigration-Benefits.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/426/Same-Sex-Partners-of-U-S-Diplomats-Gain-Immigration-Benefits.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/426/Same-Sex-Partners-of-U-S-Diplomats-Gain-Immigration-Benefits.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 19:45:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=426</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NHL Team Benefits from VISANOW’s Prompt Turnaround Time</title>
      <link>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/425/NHL-Team-Benefits-from-VISANOW-s-Prompt-Turnaround-Time.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img border="0" alt="Webstat E-Verify report" align="left" src="/Portals/16/media//blackhawks.jpg" /&gt;The National Hockey League’s trade deadline came and went Monday, February 28, leaving many players packing their bags for new teams, new cities and for some, new countries.  With such dense hockey schedules and in some situations – next day games, little time was left for the administrative matters of moving or more significantly, acquiring immigrant documentation.  Such was the case for a new Blackhawks &lt;a href="http://sports.espn.go.com/chicago/nhl/news/story?id=6172053"&gt;defenseman&lt;/a&gt;, formerly an Ottawa Senator.   As a Canadian citizen, the player needed to secure a work visa prior to even practicing with his new team, the Chicago Blackhawks, who wanted him dressed in a mere one day for last night’s game again the Calgary Flames.&lt;br /&gt;
   &lt;br /&gt;
While the visa process can at times take several days or weeks, the Blackhawks trusted VISANOW to deliver.  Our unmatched process coupled with expert attorneys and attentive customer service confirmed the U.S. work visa would arrive on time.  In order to guarantee physical delivery of the visa before the player landed in Chicago, VISANOW expedited the case with special handling instructions and closely monitored every step to certify less than 24 hour approval and turnaround.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It’s not unusual for sports figures or celebrities to run into visa issues when on a deadline or consistently traveling to and from various countries.  A similar NHL situation occurred last month with a Colorado Avalanche player, &lt;a href="http://aol.sportingnews.com/nhl/story/2011-02-07/forsberg-must-settle-visa-issue"&gt;Peter Forsberg&lt;/a&gt;, who was forced to leave the country and clear up visa issues with his home country in Canada, leaving him to miss games in the interim.  Managing expiration dates and the fine print of work or travel visas is no simple task; however, those companies and individuals who choose an immigration provider with electronic capabilities to manage these details enjoy the luxury of automatic alerts and reminders.   To find out more about VISANOW’s patented online system, &lt;a href="http://www.visanow.com/business-immigration/guarantee.aspx"&gt;guaranteed approval&lt;/a&gt; or 24/7 customer service, contact us &lt;a href="http://www.visanow.com/Contact-Us.aspx"&gt;online&lt;/a&gt; or call 855-VISANOW.   &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Photo attribution: &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/joshuamellin/"&gt;http://www.flickr.com/photos/joshuamellin/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/425/NHL-Team-Benefits-from-VISANOW-s-Prompt-Turnaround-Time.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/425/NHL-Team-Benefits-from-VISANOW-s-Prompt-Turnaround-Time.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/425/NHL-Team-Benefits-from-VISANOW-s-Prompt-Turnaround-Time.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 21:54:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=425</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>March 2011 Visa Bulletin  </title>
      <link>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/424/March-2011-Visa-Bulletin.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt="naturalization" style="float: left" src="/Portals/16/media/VB image.jpg" /&gt;The March 2011 Visa Bulletin shows continued movement forward for the employment-based immigration categories, but the family-based categories still show the government apparently adjusting to unexpected levels of demand.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Almost all employment-based preference categories showed modest gains, continuing the trend of prior months:&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;China again was the only country in the EB second preference category to move ahead, increasing by 1 week to 07/08/2006.  India remains at 05/08/2006, where it has been since the September 2010 bulletin.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;The EB third category again saw healthy movement forward for all countries.
    &lt;ul&gt;
        &lt;li&gt;Mexico is this month’s greatest beneficiary, jumping ahead by 8 months to 01/08/2004.&lt;/li&gt;
        &lt;li&gt;China and India both advanced by 3 weeks, to 01/22/2004 and 03/15/2002, respectively.&lt;/li&gt;
        &lt;li&gt;All other countries, including the Philippines, moved forward by 3 months, to 07/01/2005.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;/ul&gt;
    &lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;The EB-3 category for “Other Workers” showed strong progress for some nations, but not others. 
    &lt;ul&gt;
        &lt;li&gt;Every country except China, India, and Mexico moved ahead in this category by 1½ months, to 06/15/2003.&lt;/li&gt;
        &lt;li&gt;India again moved forward by 3 weeks, to 03/15/2002.&lt;/li&gt;
        &lt;li&gt;Neither China nor Mexico moved ahead this month, the only categories besides EB-2 for India to show no progress.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;/ul&gt;
    &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In contrast, the priority dates in the family-based Visa Bulletin seem to show the difficulty of the government to regulate and predict the level of demand in various categories, with retrogression for some foreign nationals, and great leaps forward for others who were previously retrogressed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;In the FB first preference category for the unmarried children over 21 of U.S. citizens, Mexico and the Philippines were again the only countries who saw any gains.  While all other countries remained at 01/01/2005, Mexico moved ahead by 10 days to 02/01/1993, and the Philippines moved ahead by as much as 4½ months to 12/15/1994.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;The FB-2A preference category for the spouses and unmarried children under 21 of lawful permanent residents continues the disappointing trend of backwards movement after coming close to current earlier this year.  The priority dates for this category retrogressed by 1 year for all countries, to 01/01/2007, except for Mexico, which moved backwards by 9 months to 01/01/2006. &lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;The FB-2B preference category for the unmarried children over 21 of green card holders exhibits even more confusion.  Except for the Dominican Republic, Mexico, and the Philippines, all countries stayed at 04/15/2003. Meanwhile, the Dominican Republic, which had been severely retrogressed by 5 years last month, bounced back a full 4 years to 01/01/2001, which is still a net loss of 1 year.  Filipino nationals gained 2 months, moving to 08/01/1999, and Mexicans moved by 2 weeks to 07/15/1992.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;The FB-3 preference category for the married children of U.S. citizens again seemed to show inability on the part of the government to predict demand.  Last month, Mexico had been the only country to move ahead by 1 month; this month, they lose 3 weeks, moving backwards to 11/01/1992.  Filipino nationals at least saw a move ahead in this category, by 1½ months to 12/08/1991.  All other countries remain steady at 01/01/2001.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;The FB-4 category, which is for the siblings of U.S. citizens, only Mexico saw any movement ahead, by 3 weeks to 01/22/1996.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt="naturalization" style="float: left" src="/Portals/16/media/vbmarch11.png" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="clear: both"&gt;Legend&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;C = current as there is no waiting period necessary to file for permanent residency&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;U = unavailable as visa supply has been exhausted for the remainder of fiscal year, or legislation creating the category has expired&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Date indicated = cut-off date that indicates a backlog; if the priority date (date the labor certification or I-140 was filed, depending on the type of case) is BEFORE the date listed, one may apply for permanent residency&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Employment-Based Preferences&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;First: Priority Workers&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Second:  Members of the Professions Holding Advanced Degrees or Persons of Exceptional Ability&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Third:  Skilled Workers, Professionals, and Other Workers&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Fourth:  Certain Special Immigrants&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Fifth:  Employment Creation&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a&gt;&lt;img alt="naturalization" style="float: left" src="http://www.visanow.com/Portals/16/media/vbfmarch11.png" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="clear: both"&gt;Legend&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;C = current as there is no waiting period necessary to file for permanent residency&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;U = unavailable as visa supply has been exhausted for the remainder of fiscal year, or legislation creating the category has expired&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Date indicated = cut-off date that indicates a backlog; if the priority date (date the I-130 was filed) is BEFORE the date listed, one may apply for permanent residency&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Family-Based Preferences&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;First: Unmarried sons and daughters (i.e., children over 21 years of age) of U.S. citizens&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;2A:  Spouses and children (i.e., unmarried children under 21 years of age) of lawful permanent residents&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;2B:  Unmarried sons and daughters (i.e., children over 21 years of age) of lawful permanent residents&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Third:  Married sons and daughters of U.S. citizens&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Fourth:  Brothers and sisters of U.S. citizens&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Photo attribution: http://www.flickr.com/photos/8042373@N03/&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/424/March-2011-Visa-Bulletin.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/424/March-2011-Visa-Bulletin.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/424/March-2011-Visa-Bulletin.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 16:01:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=424</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Employment Authorization and Advance Parole Documentation Combined for I-485 Applicants</title>
      <link>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/423/Employment-Authorization-and-Advance-Parole-Documentation-Combined-for-I-485-Applicants.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img border="0" alt="Webstat E-Verify report" align="left" style="width: 275px; height: 159px" src="/Portals/16/media//ead.jpg" /&gt;As of February 11, the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced that they have started issuing a combined employment and travel authorization card for applicants filing Form I-485, Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status in the U.S.  The new card is indistinguishable from the existing Employment Authorization Document (EAD) except it now includes additional text on the front of the card which reads “Serves as I-512 Advance Parole.”   The combined card will eliminate the need to carry both the EAD in addition to paper forms of Advance Parole, a more durable and secure solution.  Obtaining the card allows the ability for applicants waiting on adjustment of status to travel abroad and return to the U.S. without dropping the pending adjustment application.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For employers, the employment verification processes remain the same due to the new card also functioning as an acceptable List A document for I-9 purposes.   The card still carries an expiration date that employers must continue to pay close attention to.  For further questions regarding the acceptable document list or I-9 compliance, please &lt;a href="http://www.visanow.com/Contact-Us.aspx"&gt;contact VISANOW&lt;/a&gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For foreign nationals, the same travel guidelines apply as with the previous Advance Parole paper documents.   The I-485 applicant must still present the card to request parole when returning to the United States.  A Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Officer at a designated port-of-entry is responsible for granting parole.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Written by: Stephanie O. &lt;br /&gt;
Photo attribution: &lt;a href="http://www.uscis.gov/"&gt;http://www.uscis.gov/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/423/Employment-Authorization-and-Advance-Parole-Documentation-Combined-for-I-485-Applicants.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/423/Employment-Authorization-and-Advance-Parole-Documentation-Combined-for-I-485-Applicants.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/423/Employment-Authorization-and-Advance-Parole-Documentation-Combined-for-I-485-Applicants.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 20:17:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=423</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>E-Verify’s New Self Check System Effective March 18</title>
      <link>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/422/E-Verify-s-New-Self-Check-System-Effective-March-18.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img border="0" alt="Webstat E-Verify report" align="left" src="/Portals/16/media//check.jpg" /&gt;On March 18, 2011, the E-Verify system (an electronic verification system that compares an employee’s I-9 information with government databases) will host a new feature, known as Self Check, which allows individual employees to check their employment eligibility status and have the opportunity to correct any verification errors prior to beginning a new job.  The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced the addition of Self Check in response to criticisms that the existing E-Verify system offered limited opportunities for an employee to access identification information and rectify inaccuracies that may lead to a tentative nonconfirmation (TNC), which is a temporary notice given when an employee’s I-9 information does not match government files.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition to reducing the amount of TNC notifications, another goal of Self Check is to decrease the employer/HR involvement and lessen the wait time involved with a mismatch by allowing employees to facilitate corrections on the spot.  Employers should be aware that Self Check cannot be used as a screening tool; the system is available only after an employment offer has been extended, but can be used before the actual date of hire.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Self Check is a voluntary system that will function in two steps.  The employee will begin by entering basic information (i.e. name, address, date of birth, etc.) to be sent to an identity proofing service (idP) for verification.  The idP will automatically produce at least two questions that pertain to only the individual checking authorization, if answered correctly the process will move to step two.  The employee will enter additional citizenship information in this step, typically found on the Form I-9, and submit for an official E-Verify eligibility query.   The system will return with either a match or a mismatch, at which time the employee will be prompted through correcting any mistakes.  Common errors generally occur within the name field, found recorded differently on various government documents.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Written by: Stephanie O. &lt;br /&gt;
Photo attribution: &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/vinthomas/"&gt;http://www.flickr.com/photos/vinthomas/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/422/E-Verify-s-New-Self-Check-System-Effective-March-18.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/422/E-Verify-s-New-Self-Check-System-Effective-March-18.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/422/E-Verify-s-New-Self-Check-System-Effective-March-18.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 15:06:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=422</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New Compliance Requirements and Regulations for Canada’s Temporary Foreign Worker Program in Effect April 1</title>
      <link>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/421/New-Compliance-Requirements-and-Regulations-for-Canada-s-Temporary-Foreign-Worker-Program-in-Effect-April-1.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt="" align="left" src="/Portals/16/media/canada.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;Beginning April 1, 2011, Canada’s Temporary Foreign Worker Program (TWFP) adopts a number of significant changes and regulations jointly affecting employers, HR, and foreign workers. For employers to now be eligible for the TWFP, they must prove previous compliance with the rules and regulations of the program for the past two years or face a possible two year probation penalty, prohibiting the employer from hiring a temporary foreign worker (TFW).   In addition to compliance, employers will be subject to a more intense evaluation of employment offers before Citizenship and Immigration Canada (CIC) will authorize a work permit.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;The recent economic condition coupled with increased demand for temporary labor has challenged the CIC to further regulate fair treatment of TFWs and eliminate exploitation of the program.  Even though the new TFWP regulations go into effect on April 1, employers will be assessed retroactively on their participation in the program from April 1, 2009. Thus, employers should take this opportunity to review all work permits since April 1, 2009 to guarantee that wages, working conditions and occupation have remained valid from the original employment offer. CIC will publicly issue a list of any employers found to be non-compliant on their website, who will at minimum, be banned for two years from participating in the TFWP.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;A four-year cap on Canadian work permits is also a new addition to the regulations taking effect this April. TFWs will only be authorized to work a cumulative four years maximum, after which they will be required to wait four years to reapply for another work permit.  Exceptions apply for employees who are exempt from the Labour Market Opinion (LMO) requirement, such as international treaty agreements or study permits. The Canadian LMO is an assessment on the impact a foreign worker will have on Canada’s labor market and is necessary before a foreign worker can apply for a work permit. Currently, the LMO has a validity date of 6 months, a timeframe which will be bound by law after the April 1 changes take effect. &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Written by: Stephanie O. &lt;br /&gt;
Photo attribution: &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/vincealongi/"&gt;http://www.flickr.com/photos/vincealongi/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/421/New-Compliance-Requirements-and-Regulations-for-Canada-s-Temporary-Foreign-Worker-Program-in-Effect-April-1.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/421/New-Compliance-Requirements-and-Regulations-for-Canada-s-Temporary-Foreign-Worker-Program-in-Effect-April-1.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/421/New-Compliance-Requirements-and-Regulations-for-Canada-s-Temporary-Foreign-Worker-Program-in-Effect-April-1.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 00:42:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=421</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Obama and Napolitano Continue to Support Immigration Reform</title>
      <link>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/420/Obama-and-Napolitano-Continue-to-Support-Immigration-Reform.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt="" align="left" src="/Portals/16/media/napo.jpg" /&gt;For those seeking hope after the DREAM Act’s defeat in lame duck this year President Obama’s second State of the Union address last month did not deliver.  The brief mention of immigration mirrored much of what was said in 2010, referencing the president's stance on border security, comprehensive immigration reform and illegal students, while avoiding mention of a tangible plan during his discussion.   What has undoubtedly gained more attention on the immigration front is the first ever State of America’s Homeland Security address given by Secretary Janet Napolitano and her follow-up invitation late last week for top Democrats and Republicans in Congress to witness the condition at the Mexican border firsthand this spring. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Since Obama's inauguration, immigration activists have been hanging onto promises of a plan for comprehensive immigration reform. Instead, employer enforcement has taken precedence, and they argue that the two tactics are contradictory for those waiting on a chance at citizenship. The release of Obama’s more in depth plan following his State of the Union reiterates his commitment to the overall cause as well as the progress his administration has made, however, if Obama is to remain the glimmer of hope for immigration reform, he will need to solidify his next steps and define strategy for success amongst congress to those who elected him.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;During her speech, Secretary Napolitano highlighted border control, criminal illegal aliens and immigration enforcement accomplishments since the new administration, and reiterated the Department of Homeland Security‘s (DHS) goal to further improve those figures in 2011.  She emphasized workforce compliance and employer enforcement, stressing the continuation of increased audits. The E-Verify “Self-Check” system is planned for deployment in 2011, a proactive system to allow prospective workers to check their employment authorization status while passing along any national security risks to the DHS. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Napolitano’s confidence in the administration’s efforts was evident last week when the news of her invite south came out almost immediately after the announcement that the government was being counter-sued by Arizona for “failing to secure the border and protect citizens against the negative effects of illegal immigration.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Written by: Stephanie O. &lt;br /&gt;
Photo attribution: &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/bpamerica/"&gt;http://www.flickr.com/photos/bpamerica/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/420/Obama-and-Napolitano-Continue-to-Support-Immigration-Reform.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/420/Obama-and-Napolitano-Continue-to-Support-Immigration-Reform.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/420/Obama-and-Napolitano-Continue-to-Support-Immigration-Reform.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2011 23:22:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=420</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Chipotle Gets ICE’d</title>
      <link>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/419/Chipotle-Gets-ICE-d.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt="" align="left" src="/Portals/16/media/chipotle.jpg" /&gt;Chipotle Mexican Grill is the latest business to make headlines in late January due to an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) audit in Minnesota that lead to the dismissal of hundreds of employees. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The news of Chipotle’s inspection reiterates not only the importance of I-9 and immigration compliance but also the seriousness of the government’s continued efforts to carry out the Obama administration’s plan to place more accountability on employers.  The administration has even gone as far as to designate an office, named the &lt;a href="http://www.ice.gov/news/releases/1101/110120washingtondc.htm"&gt;Employment Compliance Inspection Center&lt;/a&gt;, to carryout audits more frequently with the appropriate staff, handling all sizes of employers.  It’s clear that the government is not easing up on I-9 compliance enforcement. Employers need to be prepared, and there are many steps that employers can take to minimize their non-compliance risk and reduce potential ICE penalties/sanctions.  Online I-9 management, internal audits, and compliance training can not only help reduce malpractice and discrimination risk, but also prove “good faith” efforts in the event of an ICE audit. Learn more about &lt;a href="http://www.visanow.com/resources/employment-eligibility/audit-compliance.aspx"&gt;how to get I-9 compliant before getting audited&lt;/a&gt; (recorded webcast) or about &lt;a href="http://www.visanow.com/business-immigration/employment-elligibility.aspx"&gt;VISANOW’s comprehensive I-9 compliance services.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Chipotle failed to provide ICE with authentic work documents for the employees in question and according to Chipotle spokespeople, ICE did not permit any opportunity to resolve the dilemma. Chipotle has also received a notice of inspection for Virginia and Washington D.C., warning that more employee dismissals may be on the horizon.  While Chipotle is the current victim of “silent raids,” in fiscal year 2010, ICE conducted more than twice the amount of silent raids than in 2009, issuing more than seven million dollars in fines to employers. The Obama administration has made drastic changes since the presidency of George W. Bush, who focused on tracking down the workers themselves and arresting on the spot.  These workplace raids were costly and gained criticism about their efficiency and parity.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The silent raids have also gained criticism from employers, especially small business owners, who say they have little resources to “police” workers and fear discrimination if they scrutinize some employee’s documents over others.  The government has recognized these concerns and developed a voluntary program in 2006 called &lt;a href="http://www.ice.gov/image/"&gt;IMAGE&lt;/a&gt; (Immigration and Customs Enforcement Mutual Agreement between Government and Employees), which enables businesses to receive training and assessments from the government to help protect hiring illegal immigrants and detect fraud from the get-go.  Tyson foods, who employs over 100,000 people, recently joined the program to carry-on efforts with immigration compliance after the poultry processor suffered a lawsuit in 2003 for unauthorized workers. The program is free; however participants must also participate in E-Verify, an internet-based system that verifies an employee’s employment eligibility with government records.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Written by: Stephanie O. &lt;br /&gt;
Photo attribution: http://www.flickr.com/photos/seiu/&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/419/Chipotle-Gets-ICE-d.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/419/Chipotle-Gets-ICE-d.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/419/Chipotle-Gets-ICE-d.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 15:46:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=419</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Revised M-274 I-9/E-Verify Compliance Handbook Issued  </title>
      <link>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/418/Revised-M-274-I-9-E-Verify-Compliance-Handbook-Issued.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img border="0" alt="Webstat E-Verify report" align="left" src="/Portals/16/media//m274.png" /&gt;The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) recently released an &lt;a href="http://www.uscis.gov/files/form/m-274.pdf"&gt;updated version of The Handbook for Employers, Instructions for Completing Form I-9&lt;/a&gt;.   Also known as the M-274, the handbook provides guidance on Form I-9, E-Verify, and verification procedures to help employers avoid malpractice and discrimination. The update includes additional employment eligibility guidance and new illustrations to exemplify sample documents. Further, many sections of the manual have also been simplified and reorganized.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are several changes to be aware of and certain benefits to take advantage of, especially in regards to documenting the employment authorization of foreign national employees. To avoid non-compliance risk, I-9 administrators should review the handbook and &lt;a href="http://www.visanow.com/Contact-Us.aspx"&gt;contact VISANOW&lt;/a&gt; with any questions or concerns.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Highlights of the changes made to the M-274 include:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;H-1B holders who wish to change employers &lt;/strong&gt;can now begin work without first receiving a Form I-797 Receipt Notice from the USCIS.   The foreign national must file their new I-129 petition with the USCIS and the employer must also indicate the submission date (of the I-129) and the text “AC-21” (American Competitiveness in the Twenty-First Century Act) in the margin of Form I-9.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Employee name change &lt;/strong&gt;updates on Form I-9s are only suggested according to the new handbook and not a requirement. &lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;J, F and M students/visitors &lt;/strong&gt;are featured in the handbook with special instructions and images on how the I-9 should be completed for each status.  The handbook also includes improved instructions for those switching to H-1B status and reiterates that an employer must update a student’s Form I-20. &lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Temporary Protected Status (TPS)&lt;/strong&gt; benefits have been further defined to include sample images of an Employment Authorization Document (EAD) and instructions on expiration dates.  A TPS beneficiary may continue to work after their expiration date if the Federal government has temporarily extended the validity date of the EAD through a notice published in the Federal Register.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Refugees and Asylees &lt;/strong&gt;re-verification procedures are also explained in relation to completing the Employment Authorization Document.  Refugees and Asylees may use an expired EAD to complete the Form I-9, but it is not required.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;A retention calculator &lt;/strong&gt;has been added to assist employers with configuring how long they must retain a terminated employee’s I-9 form.  This section of the handbook also includes guidelines for employers who use electronic I-9 storage on descriptions they should keep available should information be requested from a government entity.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Extensions of status&lt;/strong&gt; employees are eligible to continue working for 240 days beyond their work authorization expiration as long as an extension of status was timely filed and the application remains pending.  Employers also receive clarification on how to complete I-9 forms and supporting documentation for employees who have filed extensions.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Interruptions of employment &lt;/strong&gt;are clarified to include an accepted list of situations that qualify as “continuing employment” (leave of absence, maternity leave, etc.), which do not require a new Form I-9 so long as the employee maintains “a reasonable expectation of employment.”&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Expanded Question and Answer section &lt;/strong&gt;which discusses correcting a mistake on a Form I-9, not leaving blank fields, acquisition of a workforce, maintaining security and privacy, and numerous other topics.&lt;br /&gt;
     &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Photo attribution: &lt;a href="http://www.uscis.gov/files/form/m-274.pdf"&gt;http://www.uscis.gov/files/form/m-274.pdf&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/418/Revised-M-274-I-9-E-Verify-Compliance-Handbook-Issued.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/418/Revised-M-274-I-9-E-Verify-Compliance-Handbook-Issued.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/418/Revised-M-274-I-9-E-Verify-Compliance-Handbook-Issued.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 20:17:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=418</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>February 2011 Visa Bulletin </title>
      <link>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/417/February-2011-Visa-Bulletin.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt="naturalization" style="float: left" src="/Portals/16/media/VB image.jpg" /&gt;The U.S. Department of State’s (“DOS”) February 2011 Visa Bulletin continues the trends of prior months, with continued forward movement for the employment-based Visa Bulletin, but either no movement or retrogression (i.e., the backward movement of priority dates) in most preference categories.  The DOS confirmed that the increased demand is the result of more family-based applicants with very early priority dates now becoming “documentarily qualified” to be granted their immigrant visas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the employment-based Visa Bulletin, almost every category with a cutoff date moved forward.  There were no giant leaps ahead of more than 30 days, but even small gains are indicative of the fact that the DOS seems to have gotten a handle on predicting employment-based demand and is able to keep these categories moving.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;In the EB second preference category, China moved ahead by 9 days, to 07/01/2006.  India remains at 05/08/2006, where it has been since the September 2010 bulletin.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Every country had a gain of several weeks in the EB third category:
    &lt;ul&gt;
        &lt;li&gt;India had the greatest gain in the EB-3 category, with an advancement of 21 days to 02/22/2022.&lt;/li&gt;
        &lt;li&gt;China advanced over 2 weeks, to 01/01/2004.&lt;/li&gt;
        &lt;li&gt;Mexico also advanced over 2 weeks, to 05/01/2003.&lt;/li&gt;
        &lt;li&gt;All other countries moved forward by 10 days, to 04/01/2005.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;/ul&gt;
    &lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;In the EB-3 category reserved for “Other Workers,” only China saw no movement forward. 
    &lt;ul&gt;
        &lt;li&gt;India again showed the greatest movement forward, moving ahead by 21 days to 02/22/2022.&lt;/li&gt;
        &lt;li&gt;Mexico also advanced in this category by more than 2 weeks, to 05/01/2003.&lt;/li&gt;
        &lt;li&gt;All other countries moved forward by 9 days, to 05/01/2003.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;/ul&gt;
    &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The family-based Visa Bulletin, on the other hand, continues to exhibit the consequences of the rapid push forward in many of these categories over the past year.  The DOS confirms that this was because those whose priority dates became current over the last year were slow to submit their documentation to apply for their immigrant visas and green cards.  Because of the delay, they did not become “documentarily qualified” for a green card until this year.  When a large number of “documentarily qualified” applicants have priority dates much earlier than the cutoff date in their particular preference category, this will cause the dates to slow, stop, or move backwards (“retrogress”).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This month, the only “winners” in the family-based categories are the countries of Mexico and the Philippines, as they had the only categories posting any gains:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;In the FB first preference category, which represents the unmarried children over 21 of U.S. citizens, Mexico moved ahead by 2 weeks to 01/22/1993, and the Philippines by 2 months to 08/01/1994.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;In the FB-2B preference category, which is for the unmarried children over 21 of green card holders, Mexican nationals advanced by 9 days to 07/01/1992, and Filipinos by over 2 weeks to 06/01/1999.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;In the FB-3 preference category for the married children of U.S. citizens, only Mexico had any forward movement, advancing 1 month to 11/22/1992.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;For FB-4 applicants, who are the siblings of U.S. citizens, Mexican nationals saw a move forward of 10 days to 01/01/1996.  Filipino nationals advanced by 2 weeks to 01/15/1988.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For all other foreign nationals besides Mexicans and Filipinos, the family-based immigration situation is more dire.  Most categories remained the same as last month, and the only priority dates that moved, moved backwards:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;For the Dominican Republic, the FB-2B preference category for the unmarried children over 21 of U.S. citizens very severely retrogressed by almost 5 years, from 03/01/2002 to 01/01/1997.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;For all foreign nationals in the FB-4 category for U.S. citizens’ siblings, the priority dates moved even further backwards, to 01/01/2000.  This is a 2-year loss after holding at 01/01/2002 since the November 2010 Visa Bulletin.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt="naturalization" style="float: left" src="/Portals/16/media/vbfeb11.png" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="clear: both"&gt;Legend&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;C = current as there is no waiting period necessary to file for permanent residency&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;U = unavailable as visa supply has been exhausted for the remainder of fiscal year, or legislation creating the category has expired&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Date indicated = cut-off date that indicates a backlog; if the priority date (date the labor certification or I-140 was filed, depending on the type of case) is BEFORE the date listed, one may apply for permanent residency&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Employment-Based Preferences&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;First: Priority Workers&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Second:  Members of the Professions Holding Advanced Degrees or Persons of Exceptional Ability&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Third:  Skilled Workers, Professionals, and Other Workers&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Fourth:  Certain Special Immigrants&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Fifth:  Employment Creation&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a&gt;&lt;img alt="naturalization" style="float: left" src="http://www.visanow.com/Portals/16/media/vbffeb11.png" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="clear: both"&gt;Legend&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;C = current as there is no waiting period necessary to file for permanent residency&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;U = unavailable as visa supply has been exhausted for the remainder of fiscal year, or legislation creating the category has expired&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Date indicated = cut-off date that indicates a backlog; if the priority date (date the I-130 was filed) is BEFORE the date listed, one may apply for permanent residency&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Family-Based Preferences&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;First: Unmarried sons and daughters (i.e., children over 21 years of age) of U.S. citizens&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;2A:  Spouses and children (i.e., unmarried children under 21 years of age) of lawful permanent residents&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;2B:  Unmarried sons and daughters (i.e., children over 21 years of age) of lawful permanent residents&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Third:  Married sons and daughters of U.S. citizens&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Fourth:  Brothers and sisters of U.S. citizens&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Photo attribution: http://www.flickr.com/photos/8042373@N03/&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/417/February-2011-Visa-Bulletin.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/417/February-2011-Visa-Bulletin.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/417/February-2011-Visa-Bulletin.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 22:19:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=417</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Breaking News: H-1B FY2011 Cap Has Been Reached</title>
      <link>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/416/Breaking-News-H-1B-FY2011-Cap-Has-Been-Reached.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt="" align="left" src="/Portals/16/media/exclaimation mark.jpg" /&gt;On January 27, 2011, the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced that the H-1B cap has been met and will no longer accept new H-1B petitions for employment in fiscal year 2011 (which started on October 1, 2010). Now that the cap has been met, the USCIS will conduct a “lottery” of petitions received on the &lt;strong&gt;final receipt date of January 26, 2011 (not postmarked date). &lt;/strong&gt;Cases not selected in the lottery or received after January 26, 2011 will be returned. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Three options exist if you have already submitted an H-1B case and are waiting for approval:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ol&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;If you received a government receipt of an already submitted H-1B petition, your case will proceed as normal &lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;If you submitted your H-1B petition prior to January 26th, but did not receive a receipt, you will be either notified that your petition was selected to proceed (by receipt) or notified of rejection* &lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;If your petition was postmarked on or after January 26th, 2011, you must wait for either a spot in the lottery or a rejection* letter&lt;br /&gt;
    *A rejection is not considered a denial.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The USCIS will begin accepting applications for employment in fiscal year 2012 (with an earliest possible employment start date of October 1, 2011) on April 1, 2011.&lt;/strong&gt; We recommend starting your application as soon as possible for filing on April 1, because if the demand remains strong, the cap may be reached on or shortly after the April 1st filing date.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you have questions or would like to discuss options related to applications that did not meet the January 26th cut off, please contact VISANOW or your immigration services provider.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Photo attribution: http://www.flickr.com/photos/8042373@N03/&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/416/Breaking-News-H-1B-FY2011-Cap-Has-Been-Reached.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/416/Breaking-News-H-1B-FY2011-Cap-Has-Been-Reached.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/416/Breaking-News-H-1B-FY2011-Cap-Has-Been-Reached.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 17:57:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=416</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Survey Says Employers Likely to Recommend E-Verify</title>
      <link>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/415/Survey-Says-Employers-Likely-to-Recommend-E-Verify.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img border="0" alt="Webstat E-Verify report" align="left" src="/Portals/16/media//thumb.jpg" /&gt;A customer survey of the E-Verify system (an employment verification system operated by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Social Security Administration (SSA)), given to more than 4,500 random employers has been released, finding high approval ratings and favorable feedback amongst users.  The &lt;a href="http://www.uscis.gov/USCIS/Resources/Reports/E-Verify/e-verify-satisfaction-report-10-15-10.pdf"&gt;results of the customer satisfaction survey&lt;/a&gt; were coincidentally published in accordance with the &lt;a href="http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d11146.pdf"&gt;Government Accountability Office’s (GAO) report &lt;/a&gt;indicating widespread improvements in accuracy and fraud reduction of the E-Verify system.   &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Both reports help validate the United States Citizenship and Immigration Service’s (USCIS) claim that given the appropriate resources from the Obama administration, E-Verify could develop into a valuable asset responsible for securing a legal workforce. For any employers considering the system, this news is positive reinforcement addressing concerns regarding E-Verify’s accuracy and effectiveness. The USCIS reported that “more than 243,000 employers representing more than 834,000 worksites currently use E-Verify, with an average of 1,000 new employers enrolling each week.” &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The customer satisfaction survey began July 2010 and rated E-Verify on registration, ease of use, technical support and customer service.  Most notably, the customer service category received a score of 89 out of 100, likely as a result of monitoring employers’ compliance with the system and proactively providing assistance.  Overall, the E-Verify system received a total score of 82 out of 100 according to the American Customer Satisfaction Index scale, revealing that users would willingly refer other employers to the program.   &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The GAO report measured E-Verify data from 2009 to 2010 to monitor the system’s progress in ensuring accuracy and reducing fraud.  The three main improvements GAO focused on were a reduction in tentative nonconfirmations (TNC), safeguarding employee’s personal information, and preparation for possible mandatory use by all employers nationwide.  These key categories were identified as challenge areas by the USCIS in 2008; however the GAO’s recent report acknowledged an improved user experience.  A significant reduction in TNCs (when E-Verify specifies that an employee's Form I-9 does not match government records) was noticed and safeguards were added to limit data collection and the people accessing it. Even with such positive progression, the GAO report continued to make suggestions on how the USCIS can further advance the E-Verify program. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Written by: Stephanie O. &lt;br /&gt;
Photo attribution: &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/sarahreido/"&gt;http://www.flickr.com/photos/sarahreido/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/415/Survey-Says-Employers-Likely-to-Recommend-E-Verify.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/415/Survey-Says-Employers-Likely-to-Recommend-E-Verify.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/415/Survey-Says-Employers-Likely-to-Recommend-E-Verify.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 19:08:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=415</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Nationals of 53 Countries Authorized for the 2011 H-2A and H-2B Visa Programs</title>
      <link>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/414/Nationals-of-53-Countries-Authorized-for-the-2011-H-2A-and-H-2B-Visa-Programs.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt="" align="left" src="/Portals/16/media/farm.jpg" /&gt;The Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) list of countries eligible to participate in this year’s H-2A (for temporary agricultural jobs) and H-2B (for temporary non-agricultural jobs) programs became effective Tuesday, January 18, 2011.  The DHS, in consultation with the Department of State (DOS), has accepted 53 countries whose foreign nationals can apply for short-term work opportunities in the U.S.  The new list was published in the Federal Register today and is only valid for one year from the date of publication.  &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Both the DHS and the DOS take into account several factors when determining the list of approved countries, some considerations include the country’s cooperation with the distribution of travel documents and other statistics in regards to the citizens and nationals of that country that may interest the U.S. The &lt;a href="http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=88404e9c7c08d210VgnVCM100000082ca60aRCRD&amp;vgnextchannel=c94e6d26d17df110VgnVCM1000004718190aRCRD"&gt;2011 list&lt;/a&gt; has expanded to include 15 new countries from the 2010 list, designated for the first time ever to participate in H-2A and H-2B programs.  These countries are in addition to the 38 which already exist and are as follows:  Barbados, Estonia, Fiji, Hungary, Kiribati, Latvia, Macedonia, Nauru, Papua New Guinea, Samoa, Slovenia, Solomon Islands, Tonga, Tuvalu, and Vanuatu.  Another modification from the 2010 list is the elimination of Indonesia as a country eligible to participate in the H-2A and H-2B programs, a ruling made by the DHS and DOS based on “a number of relevant factors.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Written by: Stephanie O. &lt;br /&gt;
Photo attribution: &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/royal_broil/"&gt;http://www.flickr.com/photos/royal_broil/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/414/Nationals-of-53-Countries-Authorized-for-the-2011-H-2A-and-H-2B-Visa-Programs.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/414/Nationals-of-53-Countries-Authorized-for-the-2011-H-2A-and-H-2B-Visa-Programs.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/414/Nationals-of-53-Countries-Authorized-for-the-2011-H-2A-and-H-2B-Visa-Programs.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 19:17:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=414</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Job Growth Makes History in December, Cap Counts Rise</title>
      <link>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/413/Job-Growth-Makes-History-in-December-Cap-Counts-Rise.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt="" align="left" src="/Portals/16/media/exclaimation mark.jpg" /&gt;Massive economic growth was recognized as 2010 came to a close with the creation of over 297,000 private sector jobs.  The &lt;a href="http://www.adpemploymentreport.com/"&gt;ADP National Employment Report&lt;/a&gt; specified that December’s job creation number nearly tripled its projected forecast for the month in addition to the November rate, making it the largest monthly gain in over 10 years for the private sector (nonfarm, private employment).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The creation of jobs indicates an optimistic outlook on the economy, thus it’s no surprise that the H-1B cap count keeps growing.  With the remaining regular H-1B petitions dwindling to less than 5,000 available (as of 1/14/2011) and the Master’s cap already met, it may be as little as a few weeks until the quota is completely full.   Anyone planning to file an H-1B petition in the immediate future should continue to &lt;a href="http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=4b7cdd1d5fd37210VgnVCM100000082ca60aRCRD&amp;vgnextchannel=73566811264a3210VgnVCM100000b92ca60aRCRD"&gt;watch the quota&lt;/a&gt; and file their application as soon as possible.  If you do not submit in the coming weeks, you may have to wait until April 1, 2011 to apply for the next quota, for employment beginning in October 2011 or later.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Photo attribution: http://www.flickr.com/photos/8042373@N03/&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/413/Job-Growth-Makes-History-in-December-Cap-Counts-Rise.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/413/Job-Growth-Makes-History-in-December-Cap-Counts-Rise.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/413/Job-Growth-Makes-History-in-December-Cap-Counts-Rise.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 18:31:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=413</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Florida Adopts E-Verify, Rhode Island Repeals It</title>
      <link>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/412/Florida-Adopts-E-Verify-Rhode-Island-Repeals-It.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img border="0" alt="Webstat E-Verify report" align="left" src="/Portals/16/media//everify.jpg" /&gt;On January 4, 2010, immediately following the governor inauguration ceremonies, immigration took the front seat in Florida and Rhode Island as two newly elected governors promptly addressed the E-verify program, an internet-based system that matches an employee’s I-9 information with the databases of the Social Security Administration (SSA) and Department of Homeland Security (DHS).  On that day, Governor Rick Scott (R-FL) issued &lt;a href="http://www.flgov.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/scott.eo_.two_.pdf"&gt;Executive Order 11-02 &lt;/a&gt;mandating the use of E-Verify for all Florida state agencies and contractors.  Florida has now become the 14th state in the nation to have mandatory E-Verify requirements outside of federal law, which currently requires only federal contractors and subcontractors to use E-Verify.  Conversely, Governor Lincoln Chafee (I-RI) &lt;a href="http://www.governor.ri.gov/documents/executiveorders/Executive_Order%20_11-02.pdf"&gt;withdrew&lt;/a&gt; his state’s 2008 &lt;a href="http://www.ric.edu/humanresources/pdf/Signed%20Executive%20Order%20e-verify.pdf"&gt;Executive Order 08-01&lt;/a&gt; that required state agencies and contractors to use the E-Verify program; Chafee considered the statute unsuccessful in handling the financial and unemployment issues of Rhode Island. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As more states adapt their own E-Verify regulations, or debate doing so, it will be important to consider that employers will now be under a microscope.  E-Verify is a multifaceted system that allows the government to take a close look at employers' hiring processes, even more so now that regulations differ state by state.  Employers are responsible for guaranteeing the precision of the entire system and without proper training and counsel, small inaccuracies will be costly to all parties involved. Please contact VISANOW to learn more about E-Verify and get answers to your questions about state requirements, employment eligibility and staying compliant. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Florida’s new executive order is two-fold and differs from the various programs its’ fellow 13 states have adopted.  The first condition requires “all agencies under the direction of the Governor” to utilize the E-Verify system to confirm that all current and prospective agency employees are eligible for employment.  The second portion requires all state contractors “employed during the contract term to the contractor” and “assigned by the contractor to perform work pursuant to the contract” also be subject to the E-Verify program.  Governor Rick Scott also added to his mandate that he strongly encourages “agencies not under the direction of the governor” to utilize the E-Verify system, although it is not required.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rhode Island’s employment eligibility amendments offset the E-Verify mandate implemented by Governor Donald Carcieri (R-RI) back in 2008, which required all state agencies and contractors to use the E-Verify system.  New governor Lincoln Chafee repealed that order supported by his belief that the original order “did not effectively address the state’s fiscal or unemployment problems” and broached “incivility.” &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
E-Verify (formerly the Basic Pilot/Employment Eligibility Verification Program) is an Internet-based system operated by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), in partnership with the SSA, to electronically verify employment eligibility by matching new hire information from I-9 forms with Social Security Numbers (SSN). If the data is consistent, a work authorization notice is issued. However, if there is a mismatch, employers must work with employees to remedy the discrepancy. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Photo attribution: uscis.gov&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/412/Florida-Adopts-E-Verify-Rhode-Island-Repeals-It.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/412/Florida-Adopts-E-Verify-Rhode-Island-Repeals-It.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/412/Florida-Adopts-E-Verify-Rhode-Island-Repeals-It.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 20:43:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=412</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Legislators Ready to Act on Immigration  </title>
      <link>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/411/Legislators-Ready-to-Act-on-Immigration.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;img border="0" alt="census 2010 immigration" align="left" src="/Portals/16/media//states.jpg" /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As the new Congress gears up for what is forecasted to be a disappointing year in immigration reform, many state legislative leaders are making plans to fight illegal immigration on the state line. Even though President Obama has promised to overhaul several untouched immigration laws, Republicans are dissatisfied and continue to look for ways to enforce border control and confront illegal immigration.  It’s plausible that up to seven states may try to pass Arizona-like (S.B. 1070) immigration laws in 2011 despite the bill’s ongoing litigation with the U.S. Department of Justice.  All seven states, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, South Carolina, Georgia and Mississippi, carry heavy support from a combination of largely republican legislators and governors. Additionally, a controversial initiative expected to be announced in Washington this week is the joint effort amongst state lawmakers to challenge the 14th Amendment and deny birthright citizenship to children born of illegal immigrants.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The new state laws will impose similar provisions to those of the Arizona bill, but may include additional measures, such as barring illegal immigrant students from public universities (Georgia) or the seizure of vehicles and property used for transporting illegal immigrants (Oklahoma). Even more drastically, a change to the birthright citizenship would no longer grant all children born in the United States automatic citizenship, a strategy aimed to discourage immigrants from entering the country illegally. Such an extreme measure is unlikely to gain momentum as it impedes on federal law, the constitution and would likely have to pass through both the President and the Supreme Court.  Considering President Obama’s stance on immigration, his veto power may ease the fears of those opposed to this legislation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If more individual states begin to manage their own immigration policy, financial implications will likely need to be addressed. For example, Arizona experienced negative impacts when the convention and tourism industry sharply declined after the passage of S.B. 1070.  Thus, states trying to pass similar policies will also need to consider potential revenue losses. Further, with the Latinos voters weighing in as the fastest-growing minority voter bloc, lawmakers cannot ignore the long-lasting, future repercussions of this group.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Photo attribution: &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ninja999/"&gt;http://www.flickr.com/photos/ninja999/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/411/Legislators-Ready-to-Act-on-Immigration.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/411/Legislators-Ready-to-Act-on-Immigration.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/411/Legislators-Ready-to-Act-on-Immigration.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 22:39:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=411</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>H-1B Cap Count as of 12/24/2010, Master's Cap Reached</title>
      <link>/blog/EntryId/410/H-1B-Cap-Count-as-of-12-24-2010-Masters-Cap-Reached.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt="" align="left" src="/Portals/16/media/exclaimation mark.jpg" /&gt;The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) released H-1B cap numbers as of 12/24, receiving &lt;strong&gt;55,800&lt;/strong&gt; toward the 65,000 cap-subject H-1B petitions and &lt;strong&gt;20,000 &lt;/strong&gt;towards the 20,000 H-1B Master's category.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thus, the cap for the H-1B Master's category has been met, however, numbers remain available for those individuals through the regular cap until that too, has been reached.  There is still time to submit your FY2011 H-1B visa application for foreign national applicants beginning employment on October 1, 2010 or later. Contact your immigration services provider to see if this is an option for you/your foreign national. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Photo attribution: http://www.flickr.com/photos/8042373@N03/&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=/blog/EntryId/410/H-1B-Cap-Count-as-of-12-24-2010-Masters-Cap-Reached.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/410/H-1B-Cap-Count-as-of-12-24-2010-Masters-Cap-Reached.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">/blog/EntryId/410/H-1B-Cap-Count-as-of-12-24-2010-Masters-Cap-Reached.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 21:05:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=410</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New H-1B Electronic Registration Program</title>
      <link>/blog/EntryId/408/New-H-1B-Electronic-Registration-Program.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;img border="0" alt="census 2010 immigration" align="left" src="/Portals/16/media//keyboard.jpg" /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Recently, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) drafted a proposal to develop a mandatory online registration system for H-1B petitions. The new registration process will allow U.S. employers to supply basic application information to the USCIS online instead of submitting a full-blown H-1B petition, prior to the randomized H-1B visa lottery, which is implemented when the number of petitions exceeds the limit set by the USCIS (in a matter of weeks or even days).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the event a visa lottery is executed during a good hiring year, a full-blown H-1B petition will not need to be initially submitted, which will eliminate the need for U.S. employers to unnecessarily prepare and file tedious H-1B petitions without any guarantee that an H-1B cap number will be assigned to that particular petition. Along with helping the USCIS manage H-1B petitions more efficiently and effectively. For example, the online registration system will block duplicate or multiple submissions made by the same petitioner in order to prevent them from trying to increase their chances of success. Further, the new process will benefit employers because it will be a quicker and cheaper alternative to the previous laborious registration process. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The USCIS will release a notice of public rulemaking in January of 2011 and the comment period will end in March of 2011. If the feedback does not negatively impact or alter the proposal, the electronic registration program could go into effect in time for the filing of new H-1B petitions under the FY2012 cap. If this process is successful it will be transferred and applied to other visa petitions.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Photo attribution: &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/prasan-naik/"&gt;http://www.flickr.com/photos/prasan-naik/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=/blog/EntryId/408/New-H-1B-Electronic-Registration-Program.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/408/New-H-1B-Electronic-Registration-Program.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">/blog/EntryId/408/New-H-1B-Electronic-Registration-Program.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 22:54:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=408</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>January 2011 Visa Bulletin </title>
      <link>/blog/EntryId/407/January-2011-Visa-Bulletin.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt="naturalization" style="float: left" src="/Portals/16/media/VB image.jpg" /&gt;January 2011 brings a tale of two Visa Bulletins: the employment-based Visa Bulletin shows modest gains in almost every category, while the family-based Visa Bulletin shows severe retrogression (i.e., the backward movement of priority dates) in almost every category.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Forward movement was seen in nearly every category of the January 2011 employment-based Visa Bulletin.  The EB third preference category perhaps benefited the most, with priority dates advancing for all foreign nationals.  Mexico saw the biggest leap forward, with a jump of 9½ months to 04/15/2003 in both the EB-3 and Other Workers category.  All other countries besides India, China, and Mexico moved ahead by 1 month, to 03/22/2005.  India moved to 02/01/2002 in both the EB-3 and Other Workers categories, a progression of 9 days, and China moved ahead by 1 week to 12/15/2003.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The only other employment-based category to move forward is the EB second preference category for Chinese nationals.  These foreign nationals saw an advancement of 2 weeks, to 06/22/2010.  As predicted by the DOS in the prior bulletin, the priority date for India remains at 05/08/2006, and is anticipated to remain at this cutoff until extra, unused EB-2 numbers from other countries are released again.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In contrast to the employment-based visa bulletin, the family-based Visa Bulletin shows backward movement in almost every single category.  The U.S. Department of State had warned in recent months that due to exceptionally high levels of demand in response to the rapid advancement of last year, retrogression would be necessary to keep the level of demand in check. The January 2011 bulletin shows large-scale retrogression in nearly every category:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;In the FB first preference category, nearly all foreign nationals are now at 01/01/2005.  This represents a loss of 1 year and 1½ months, except for the Dominican Republic, for whom this actually represents a gain of 7 months.  Mexico also advances by 1 week, to 01/08/1993, but the nationals of the Philippines are particularly hard-hit, losing 2 years and 10 months and moving backwards to 06/01/1994.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;In FB-2A, which covers the spouses and children of lawful permanent residents, all countries except the Mexico lost 2 years and 7 months, retrogressing to 01/01/2008.  Mexico lost even more ground, moving back 4 years and 11 months to 04/01/2005.  This is a particularly hard-hit category, especially considering that most countries were already in the year 2010 up until the December 2010 bulletin.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;The FB-2B category includes the greatest degree of retrogression in this month’s bulletin – Filipino nationals saw a gigantic step backwards of 8 years and more than 4 months, back to 10/22/1991.  The losses suffered by other countries besides the Dominican Republic and Mexico were limited to 2 years and 1½ months, back to 04/15/2003.  The Dominican Republic actually moved ahead by 2 months, to 03/01/2002, and Mexico advanced by 4 months, to 10/22/1992.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;The FB-3 category saw retrogressions of 1 year and 5 months for almost all foreign nationals, to 01/01/2001.  Mexico remained at 10/22/1992, while the Philippines moved back 8 months and more than 1 week to 10/22/1991.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;The priority dates of the FB-4 category, which covers the brothers and sisters of U.S. citizens, remained the same across the board.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Retrogression will not only have the effect of curbing the number of applications that are eligible for filing, but will also mean that any applications already on file will not necessarily be approved, particularly if they are not adjudicated by 01/01/2011 (when the new bulletin goes into effect).  Therefore, a potentially large number of foreign nationals may be adversely affected, and those affected individuals may expect a wait of several more months, perhaps even years, to wait for the priority dates to return to their recent positions.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt="naturalization" style="float: left" src="/Portals/16/media/vb-dec2010.png" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="clear: both"&gt;Legend&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;C = current as there is no waiting period necessary to file for permanent residency&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;U = unavailable as visa supply has been exhausted for the remainder of fiscal year, or legislation creating the category has expired&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Date indicated = cut-off date that indicates a backlog; if the priority date (date the labor certification or I-140 was filed, depending on the type of case) is BEFORE the date listed, one may apply for permanent residency&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Employment-Based Preferences&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;First: Priority Workers&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Second:  Members of the Professions Holding Advanced Degrees or Persons of Exceptional Ability&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Third:  Skilled Workers, Professionals, and Other Workers&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Fourth:  Certain Special Immigrants&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Fifth:  Employment Creation&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a&gt;&lt;img alt="naturalization" style="float: left" src="http://www.visanow.com/Portals/16/media/vbf-dec2010.png" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="clear: both"&gt;Legend&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;C = current as there is no waiting period necessary to file for permanent residency&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;U = unavailable as visa supply has been exhausted for the remainder of fiscal year, or legislation creating the category has expired&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Date indicated = cut-off date that indicates a backlog; if the priority date (date the I-130 was filed) is BEFORE the date listed, one may apply for permanent residency&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Family-Based Preferences&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;First: Unmarried sons and daughters (i.e., children over 21 years of age) of U.S. citizens&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;2A:  Spouses and children (i.e., unmarried children under 21 years of age) of lawful permanent residents&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;2B:  Unmarried sons and daughters (i.e., children over 21 years of age) of lawful permanent residents&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Third:  Married sons and daughters of U.S. citizens&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Fourth:  Brothers and sisters of U.S. citizens&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Photo attribution: http://www.flickr.com/photos/8042373@N03/&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=/blog/EntryId/407/January-2011-Visa-Bulletin.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/407/January-2011-Visa-Bulletin.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">/blog/EntryId/407/January-2011-Visa-Bulletin.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 16:09:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=407</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Switzerland to Increase Work Permit Quotas</title>
      <link>/blog/EntryId/406/Switzerland-to-Increase-Work-Permit-Quotas.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img border="0" alt="census 2010 immigration" align="left" src="/Portals/16/media//swiss.jpg" /&gt;Earlier this month, the Swiss Federal Council released the 2011 quota for work permits. The 2011 quota for work permits is set at 12,000, which eclipses the quota of the last three years by 1,000. In addition to the increased quota for 2011, the Swiss Federal Council has decided to allocate permits between foreign workers from member countries of the European Union (EU) or the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) and foreign workers not from the EU/EFTA. The quota of 12,000 will be divided between short term L-Permits and long term B-Permits. Next, the “L” or “B” permits are further allocated to EU/EFTA or non EU/EFTA foreign nationals (as seen below). The quota will be effective starting January 1, 2011.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear: both"&gt;Below is a breakdown of the quota:&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;8,000 L-Permits&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;4,000 B-Permits&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/406/Switzerland-to-Increase-Work-Permit-Quotas.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">/blog/EntryId/406/Switzerland-to-Increase-Work-Permit-Quotas.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2010 22:17:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=406</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Census Shows Population Growth Due to Immigrants</title>
      <link>/blog/EntryId/405/Census-Shows-Population-Growth-Due-to-Immigrants.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img border="0" alt="census 2010 immigration" align="left" src="/Portals/16/media//census.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Last week, the U.S. Census Bureau released its data on the &lt;a href="http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/200/The-2010-Census-Arrival-and-Immigration-Affects.aspx"&gt;2010 Census&lt;/a&gt;. According to the data, as of April 1, 2010, the total U.S. resident population reached 308,745,538, which indicates that the total resident population has grown by 9.7% over the past decade. Most noteworthy though, is that three-quarters of the 9.7% growth rate was due to immigration. Since 2000, 13.1 million new immigrants (legal and illegal) have arrived in the U.S.  Additionally, immigrant women gave birth to approximately 8.2 million babies. Despite the findings, it's also essential to report how the recession has altered the immigrant population throughout the U.S.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;Prior to the recession, cities such as Tampa, Phoenix, and Riverside-San Bernardino experienced a strong growth in immigration. Currently, these cities are losing immigrants, with Phoenix suffering the greatest loss of 64,000, equating to roughly 9% of Phoenix’s foreign-born population. At the same time, Houston experienced the greatest increase in its immigrant population with 74,000. Miami came in second with 54,000, followed by Dallas with 50,000 new immigrants. Lastly Jackson, Mississippi and Birmingham, Alabama experienced the largest percent increase in their foreign-born populations with 50% and 25%, respectively.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt; &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;These population changes lead to a shift in the number of congressional seats. Florida, South Carolina, Georgia, and Texas will all gain seats due to the increase in their Latino populations. President Obama will transfer the apportionment counts to Congress once it reconvenes for its first regular session in January. The new congressional seats may have the ability to shift immigration legislation and reform in the upcoming year.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Photo attribution: &lt;a href="http://www.visanow.com/photos/mobikefed"&gt;http://www.flickr.com/photos/mobikefed&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=/blog/EntryId/405/Census-Shows-Population-Growth-Due-to-Immigrants.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/405/Census-Shows-Population-Growth-Due-to-Immigrants.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">/blog/EntryId/405/Census-Shows-Population-Growth-Due-to-Immigrants.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2010 15:52:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=405</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UK Border Agency Removes Tier 1 (General) Category</title>
      <link>/blog/EntryId/404/UK-Border-Agency-Removes-Tier-1-General-Category.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;img alt="naturalization" align="left" src="/Portals/16/media/flag.jpg" /&gt;
&lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;As of December 23&lt;sup&gt;rd&lt;/sup&gt;, the UK Border Agency (UKBA) will no longer accept Tier 1 (General) applications due to the cap on this category being met.  More significantly, the Tier 1 (General) category will be permanently eliminated. The UKBA also recently announced that the Tier 2 (General) category will have a limit of 10,832 certificates of sponsorship until 5 April 2011. The new modifications to Tier 1 &amp; 2 do not affect the permanent cap, which goes into effect in April of 2011.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt; &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;The recent changes all stemmed from a hearing on Friday December 17&lt;sup&gt;th&lt;/sup&gt;, which nullified the temporary cap in place because the High Court ruled it as “unlawful”. The High Court came to this conclusion because Home Secretary Theresa May did not allow the temporary cap to receive parliamentary examination. In other words, Home Secretary May bypassed Parliament and implemented the interim cap. In response to the ruling, Immigration Minister Damian Green urged, “This ruling is about process, not policy - the policy of having a limit has not been found to be unlawful.”&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt; &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;The Tier 1 &amp; 2 changes come with the reinstatement of the temporary cap. Immigration Minister Green stated, “The court's ruling rests on a technicality, which we have set right today to ensure that from now on the interim limit is back up and running.” The modifications to the tier structure were released quickly by the government because there was no limit in place after the ruling. The interim limit was meant to prevent an influx of applications before the annual limit in April. Some suspect the new temporary cap may be challenged by the High Court once again due to the quick turnaround by the UKBA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Photo attribution: &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/micora/"&gt;http://www.flickr.com/photos/micora/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=/blog/EntryId/404/UK-Border-Agency-Removes-Tier-1-General-Category.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/404/UK-Border-Agency-Removes-Tier-1-General-Category.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">/blog/EntryId/404/UK-Border-Agency-Removes-Tier-1-General-Category.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 18:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=404</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>DREAM Act Shattered by Senate</title>
      <link>/blog/EntryId/403/DREAM-Act-Shattered-by-Senate.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt="Dreamact" align="left" src="/Portals/16/media/Dreamact.jpg" /&gt;This past weekend, the Senate failed to pass the DREAM Act with a 55-41 vote. The DREAM Act fell 5 votes short of the required 60 to end debate on the matter and vote for or against its passage into law. Heavy Republican opposition and Democratic support was expected after the &lt;a href="http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/400/Dream-Act-Passed-in-the-House-but-Delayed-in-the-Senate.aspx"&gt;House passed its version of the bill &lt;/a&gt;roughly two weeks ago. Hence, only three Republicans voted in favor of the measure during the Senate’s hearing of the bill, while five Democrats surprisingly voted against the legislation. President Obama said, “Common sense did not prevail” and deemed the vote “incredibly disappointing.” On the other hand, critics viewed the bill as a backdoor grant of amnesty that promotes illegal immigration to this country. Senator Jeff Sessions expressed that, "The bill at its core is a reward for illegal activities.” Regardless, the Obama Administration urged that it will continue to fight for immigration reform.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, this will be a difficult task for the Obama Administration due to the upcoming power shift - the &lt;a href="http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/395/Immigration-Faces-New-Obstacles-with-a-Power-Shift-in-Congress.aspx"&gt;Republicans taking control of the House of Representatives&lt;/a&gt; and the diminishing power of the Democratic majority in the Senate. With this control, Republicans will strive to increase immigration enforcement by focusing on our borders and the E-Verify system. Nevertheless, advocates of the DREAM Act will take their case to the states. In other words, undocumented students will aim to win smaller battles and strive to pass legislation in states like California that support immigrants.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Photo attribution: &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/dreamactivistorg/"&gt;http://www.flickr.com/photos/dreamactivistorg/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=/blog/EntryId/403/DREAM-Act-Shattered-by-Senate.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/403/DREAM-Act-Shattered-by-Senate.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">/blog/EntryId/403/DREAM-Act-Shattered-by-Senate.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 15:24:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=403</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>H-1B Cap Count as of 12/17/2010</title>
      <link>/blog/EntryId/409/H-1B-Cap-Count-as-of-12-17-2010.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt="" align="left" src="/Portals/16/media/exclaimation mark.jpg" /&gt;The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) released H-1B cap numbers as of 12/17, receiving &lt;strong&gt;53,900&lt;/strong&gt; toward the 65,000 cap-subject H-1B petitions and &lt;strong&gt;19,700 &lt;/strong&gt;towards the 20,000 H-1B Master's category.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thus, H-1B cap numbers remain available, and there is still time to submit your FY2011 H-1B visa application for foreign national applicants beginning employment on October 1, 2010 or later.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Contact your immigration services provider to see if this is an option for you/your foreign national. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Photo attribution: http://www.flickr.com/photos/8042373@N03/&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=/blog/EntryId/409/H-1B-Cap-Count-as-of-12-17-2010.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/409/H-1B-Cap-Count-as-of-12-17-2010.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">/blog/EntryId/409/H-1B-Cap-Count-as-of-12-17-2010.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 15:43:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=409</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Australia’s Immigration Numbers Tumble </title>
      <link>/blog/EntryId/402/Australia-s-Immigration-Numbers-Tumble.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt="" align="left" src="/Portals/16/media/aussie.jpg" /&gt;Even with its stable economy, Australia’s net immigration has been declining abruptly. In October 2010, 9,370 immigrants arrived in Australia, the lowest amount since March of 2004. At the same time, October is not the only month with low immigration numbers; Australia has seen declining net immigration over the span of the entire year.  The latest figures show the difference between the number of permanent and long-term arrivals versus permanent and long-term departures (net immigration), which was 210,400 as of October 2010.  During the same time period last year, net immigration was 324,700. In other words, net immigration has declined by approximately 35%.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Australia’s low immigration numbers could negatively impact its economy. &lt;a href="http://www.smh.com.au/national/while-immigration-drops-businesses-are-crying-out-for-more-staff-20101206-18mxo.html"&gt;Commonwealth Securities economist, Craig James&lt;/a&gt; explains, “Job markets are tight, with not enough local talent to fill positions.” Therefore, human resource departments are seeking out foreign talent while migrant numbers are falling. James urges, “The last thing anyone wants to see is the Reserve Bank keeping interest rates at higher levels than they should be because restrictions on migrant inflows are pushing up wages and prices.'' Last month the unemployment rate for Australia was roughly 5%. It will be interesting to see how the Australian economy responds to its immigration issue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Photo attribution: &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/darrolhouser/"&gt;http://www.flickr.com/photos/darrolhouser/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=/blog/EntryId/402/Australia-s-Immigration-Numbers-Tumble.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/402/Australia-s-Immigration-Numbers-Tumble.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">/blog/EntryId/402/Australia-s-Immigration-Numbers-Tumble.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 23:01:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=402</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Summary of UK Permanent Cap System</title>
      <link>/blog/EntryId/401/Summary-of-UK-Permanent-Cap-System.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt="naturalization" align="left" src="/Portals/16/media/flag.jpg" /&gt;Home Secretary Theresa May recently announced a number of modifications to UK’s permanent cap, designed to place a limit on non-EU economic migration, which goes into effect in April 2011. Important changes to the cap will include the elimination of the Tier 1 (General) category, the addition of an exceptional talent category, and the restructuring of the entrepreneur, investor and intra company transfer categories, which will not see cap limit enforcement. Until the permanent cap takes full effect in April of 2011, applicants can still submit visa applications under the previous tier system. However, for the month of December, the Tier 1 (General) category limit has already been met.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Below is a summary of the changes made to the cap:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h3&gt;Tier 1 &lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;(General) option will be eliminated. &lt;br /&gt;
    After April 2011 anyone hired for a position from outside the European Union will therefore need to qualify for a Tier 2 General Visa.  If someone is thinking of coming into the UK as a Tier 1 migrant, then they need to do so before April 2011. This should be done as soon as possible because demand is likely to be high.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;(Entrepreneur) option will be restructured.&lt;br /&gt;
    Creation of a new avenue for promising start-up companies which do not reach investment threshold.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;(Investor) option will also be restructured. &lt;br /&gt;
    It will offer an accelerated route to settlement, depending on the level of investment.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;(Exceptional Talent) option will be introduced. &lt;br /&gt;
    This will cover migrants who have won international recognition in scientific and cultural fields, or who show sufficient exceptional promise to be awarded such recognition in the future. Applications by those with exceptional promise will be endorsed by a competent body in the relevant field. The 'exceptional talent' category will be subject to a limit of 1,000 foreign nationals. It is unlikely that any financial or business services professionals will qualify for this.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Note: (Entrepreneur) and (Investor) routes will not be subject to a limit on numbers.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h3&gt;Tier 2&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The number of Tier 2 visas has been increased by 6,500 to take account of the loss of the Tier 1 (General) route but not enough to make up for the shortfall of approximately 14,000 visas. The following provides details on the changes made to both the (General) and (Intra Company Transfer) categories:&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;(General) &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Will be subject to a limit of 20,700 visas for 2011/12. &lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Applications will be restricted to graduate-level vacancies &lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Existing migrants in jobs below graduate level will be able to extend their permission to stay if they meet current requirements. &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The limit on Tier 2 will not apply to in-country applications from those already in the UK, dependents of Tier 2 migrants, (General) applicants who earn more than £150,000, athletes, ministers of religion, and intra company transfers.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;(Intra company transfers)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Note&lt;/strong&gt;: There is absolutely no limit on the number of non-EU employees who can enter on intra-company transfers, as long as the individual concerned is earning more than £40k and has been working overseas for that employer for more than 12 months. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Applicants in the established staff sub-category will be able to stay in the UK for up to 5 years if they are paid more than £40,000 per year; those paid between £24,000 and £40,000 will be able to enter for up to 12 months within a specified period.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Applications for certificates of sponsorship will, where the limit applies, be considered on a monthly basis. If the monthly allocation is oversubscribed, applications will be ranked according to:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ol&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Shortage occupations in the first instance&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Whether the post requires higher academic qualifications&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Salary&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;
&lt;p&gt;*Potential workers who are granted a certificate of sponsorship will have 3 months in which to apply for a visa.&lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Tier 1 pertains to skilled individuals who are not required to possess a job offer but need to pass a points-based assessment. On the other hand, Tier 2 applicants have been offered a skilled job in the UK with a prospective employer who is willing to sponsor them. The UK Government has implemented this cap as part of a push to reduce net migration by more than 75%, from approximately 200,000 to roughly 40,000 by 2015. The two major components that account for the majority of UK net migration include migrant workers and students. According to the UK Border Agency, “The student route accounts for two thirds of migrants entering the UK each year…” and “41 percent of students coming through this route were studying below degree level courses.”  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thus far the UK Government has focused its attention on migrant workers but recently released a proposal on how it plans to limit student migration to the country. This plan of action includes reducing the opportunity for students to work and sponsor dependents, tougher entry criteria, stricter accreditation procedures for colleges and universities, and allowing only highly trusted sponsors with the ability to offer below degree level classes. More importantly, if this proposal is implemented, the Tier 1 post study category will likely be eliminated. No official modifications have been made to Tier 4, the changes are only included in a proposal, while Tier 1 and 2 modifications take effect in April of 2011.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Photo attribution: &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/micora/"&gt;http://www.flickr.com/photos/micora/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=/blog/EntryId/401/Summary-of-UK-Permanent-Cap-System.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/401/Summary-of-UK-Permanent-Cap-System.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">/blog/EntryId/401/Summary-of-UK-Permanent-Cap-System.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 00:04:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=401</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dream Act Passed in the House but Delayed in the Senate</title>
      <link>/blog/EntryId/400/Dream-Act-Passed-in-the-House-but-Delayed-in-the-Senate.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt="Dreamact" align="left" src="/Portals/16/media/Dreamact.jpg" /&gt;Big waves were made last night in the lame duck session (the time between Election Day and before January 3 of the following year, when the new session of Congress is sworn in), as the DREAM Act passed in the House of Representatives for the first time in its 10-year legislative history. The act was passed with a 216-198 vote. The excitement was expected to weaken when the vote moved to the Senate; however, a motion to table the vote was made by Senator Harry Reid&lt;span&gt; &lt;span style="color: black"&gt;(D-NV)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; – arguably the DREAM’s biggest supporter, due to a declaration by Republicans to block every bill until tax cuts and government funding have been determined.  By tabling the vote until next week, supporters of the DREAM Act have paved the way to gain the Republicans undivided attention by allowing them time to resolve their current discrepancies.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;Preceding the House vote, politicians heard moving speeches from many supporters of the DREAM Act, including &lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gOcJx6ENhng"&gt;Steny Hoyer (D-MD), &lt;/a&gt;whose arguments related to a broad audience and Shirley Jackson-Lee (D-TX), who chastised Republicans for withholding those who want to serve the country.  When all votes were finally tallied, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi eagerly announced the victory with passion that was met with an eruption of applause and anticipation.  Despite the uncertain outlook for the Senate, a passing in the House is forward movement in all that has to do with immigration reform. This outcome alone has generated awareness beyond most expectations. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;The breakdown of voting in the House of Representatives raised eyebrows as 8 &lt;a id="ORGOV0000004" title="Republican Party" href="http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/186/Senate-Blocks-Defense-Bill-and-Dream-Act.aspx"&gt;&lt;span style="color: windowtext; text-decoration: none; text-underline: none"&gt;Republicans&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style="color: windowtext; text-decoration: none; text-underline: none"&gt; unpredictably voted in favor of the DREAM Act (in addition to the 208 &lt;a id="ORGOV0000005" title="Democratic Party" href="http://www.latimes.com/topic/politics/parties-movements/democratic-party-ORGOV0000005.topic"&gt;&lt;span style="color: windowtext; text-decoration: none; text-underline: none"&gt;Democrats&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;), while 38 Democrats and 160 Republicans voted against it.  If passed on all levels, the DREAM Act would allow for undocumented children, under the age of 16, to earn a path to citizenship through higher education or military service coupled with a clean criminal record, in addition to various other requirements. &lt;span style="color: black"&gt;The DREAM Act was first introduced in 2001 and has since passed the Senate Judiciary Committee four times. In 2006, the act actually passed in the Senate as part of a comprehensive immigration bill (&lt;span&gt;CIRA,&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span style="color: black"&gt;S. 2611), but later died when the House did not pass the parallel version. &lt;a href="http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/186/Senate-Blocks-Defense-Bill-and-Dream-Act.aspx"&gt;In September&lt;/a&gt; however, Senate supporters fell four votes short of the 60 necessary to end the Republican filibuster and get a vote on the bill.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Photo attribution: &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/dreamactivistorg/"&gt;http://www.flickr.com/photos/dreamactivistorg/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=/blog/EntryId/400/Dream-Act-Passed-in-the-House-but-Delayed-in-the-Senate.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/400/Dream-Act-Passed-in-the-House-but-Delayed-in-the-Senate.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">/blog/EntryId/400/Dream-Act-Passed-in-the-House-but-Delayed-in-the-Senate.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 22:14:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=400</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>H-1B Cap Count as of 12/03/2010</title>
      <link>/blog/EntryId/399/H-1B-Cap-Count-as-of-12-03-2010.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt="" align="left" src="/Portals/16/media/exclaimation mark.jpg" /&gt;The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) released H-1B cap numbers as of 12/03, receiving &lt;strong&gt;51,200&lt;/strong&gt; toward the 65,000 cap-subject H-1B petitions and &lt;strong&gt;18,700 &lt;/strong&gt;towards the 20,000 H-1B Master's category.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thus, H-1B cap numbers remain available, and there is still time to submit your FY2011 H-1B visa application for foreign national applicants beginning employment on October 1, 2010 or later.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Contact your immigration services provider to see if this is an option for you/your foreign national. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Photo attribution: http://www.flickr.com/photos/8042373@N03/&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=/blog/EntryId/399/H-1B-Cap-Count-as-of-12-03-2010.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/399/H-1B-Cap-Count-as-of-12-03-2010.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">/blog/EntryId/399/H-1B-Cap-Count-as-of-12-03-2010.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 15:28:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=399</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>H-1B Cap Count as of 11/26/2010</title>
      <link>/blog/EntryId/398/H-1B-Cap-Count-as-of-11-26-2010.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt="" align="left" src="/Portals/16/media/exclaimation mark.jpg" /&gt;The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) released H-1B cap numbers as of 11/26, receiving &lt;strong&gt;50,400&lt;/strong&gt; toward the 65,000 cap-subject H-1B petitions and &lt;strong&gt;18,400 &lt;/strong&gt;towards the 20,000 H-1B Master's category.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thus, H-1B cap numbers remain available, and there is still time to submit your FY2011 H-1B visa application for foreign national applicants beginning employment on October 1, 2010 or later.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Contact your immigration services provider to see if this is an option for you/your foreign national. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Photo attribution: http://www.flickr.com/photos/8042373@N03/&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=/blog/EntryId/398/H-1B-Cap-Count-as-of-11-26-2010.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/398/H-1B-Cap-Count-as-of-11-26-2010.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">/blog/EntryId/398/H-1B-Cap-Count-as-of-11-26-2010.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 22:48:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=398</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>December 2010 Visa Bulletin</title>
      <link>/blog/EntryId/397/December-2010-Visa-Bulletin.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt="naturalization" style="float: left" src="/Portals/16/media/VB image.jpg" /&gt;The December 2010 employment-based and family-based Visa Bulletins bring mixed news, showing a combination of some forward movement, some backward movement, and a fair number of categories showing no progress at all.  The U.S. Department of State’s (DOS) quarterly update on progress in coming months confirms that this may be the state of things for the foreseeable future.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;The December 2010 employment-based Visa Bulletin showed measurable progress, and the DOS’s projections generally predict more of the same:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;In the EB second preference category, China moved ahead by 1 week to 06/08/2006, while India remains where it was at the start of the fiscal year in October, at 05/08/2006.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The DOS confirms that this will be the continued state for this category, with China moving forward anywhere between 0 and 2 weeks, and India remaining at 05/08/2006.  It is generally expected that greater progress won’t be seen until any unused EB-2 numbers for other countries are released later in the fiscal year.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;In the EB-third preference category, Mexico surged forward by over 1 year from 05/01/2001 to 07/01/2002.  While this may appear to be the result of decreased demand, this is actually the point to which the priority date had progressed last fiscal year before numbers for this category became unavailable.  This is welcome news after a relatively slow-moving year for this country in FY 2010, as it indicates that the government has cleared or is close to clearing the backlog for Mexican nationals.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;EB-3 nationals for India and the Philippines, on the other hand, remained at the same cutoff dates, at 01/22/2002 and 02/22/2005, respectively.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Meanwhile, Chinese nationals in EB-3 moved forward by 16 days, to 12/08/2003, and all other nationals progressed forward by 1 month, to 02/22/2005.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;The EB-3 Other Workers category has progressed by 21 days for all countries except India and Mexico.  India remains at 01/22/2002, while Mexico returns to 07/01/2002.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;For EB-3, the DOS predicts progress per bulletin at the following rates:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;All Countries Except China, India, and Mexico: 3 to 6 weeks per month&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;China: 1 to 3 weeks per month&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;India: 0 to 2 weeks per month&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Mexico: no specific projections available, although forward movement is expected&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;As usual, such predictions are subject to the actual levels of demand as the year progresses.  Last fiscal year showed that the accuracy of the DOS’s predictions was variable.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;As for the family-based Visa Bulletin, the DOS has confirmed that demand this Fiscal Year has outpaced the demand from last year.  Last fiscal year, due to low levels of demand for family-based green cards, the priority dates advanced more rapidly than expected.  Now, the DOS is confirming that this year will see the progression of these dates slow, stop, or even retrogress (i.e., move backwards).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;The December 2010 bulletin confirms this slowdown.  Most of the preference categories remained the same, while the Dominican Republic and the Philippines each showed drastic moves backwards:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;In the FB first preference category, all cutoff dates remained where they were in November, except those for the Dominican Republic and Mexico.  Again this year, due to heightened demand, the Dominican Republic fell 2 years behind the rest of the world (except Mexico and the Philippines), to 06/01/2004.  Mexico was the sole country that moved ahead, by 9 days to 01/01/1993.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;FB-2A continues to outperform the rest of categories, each country moving forward by 2 months to 08/01/2010, except for Mexico, which remained at 03/01/2010.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;FB-2B dates remained the same for all countries, except the Dominican Republic and the Philippines.  Unexpected levels of demand in both countries have led to severe retrogression.  For the Dominican Republic, this led to a massive move back from 06/01/2005 to 01/01/2002.  For the Philippines, the cutoff date moved back by more than 2 years from 09/01/2002 to 03/01/2000.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;FB-3 dates also did not move for all countries, except the Philippines.  For Filipino nationals, the date retrogressed by more than 3 years, from 03/01/1995 to 07/01/1992.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;In the FB fourth preference category, these again all remained the same, except for Mexico, which moved forward by 1 week to 12/22/1995, and the Philippines which retrogressed by more than 3 years from 04/01/1991 to 01/01/1988. &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt="naturalization" style="float: left" src="http://www.visanow.com/Portals/16/media/snipdec10.png" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="clear: both"&gt;Legend&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;C = current as there is no waiting period necessary to file for permanent residency&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;U = unavailable as visa supply has been exhausted for the remainder of fiscal year, or legislation creating the category has expired&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Date indicated = cut-off date that indicates a backlog; if the priority date (date the labor certification or I-140 was filed, depending on the type of case) is BEFORE the date listed, one may apply for permanent residency&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Employment-Based Preferences&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;First: Priority Workers&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Second:  Members of the Professions Holding Advanced Degrees or Persons of Exceptional Ability&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Third:  Skilled Workers, Professionals, and Other Workers&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Fourth:  Certain Special Immigrants&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Fifth:  Employment Creation&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a&gt;&lt;img alt="naturalization" style="float: left" src="http://www.visanow.com/Portals/16/media/snip visa bulletin family dec 10.png" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="clear: both"&gt;Legend&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;C = current as there is no waiting period necessary to file for permanent residency&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;U = unavailable as visa supply has been exhausted for the remainder of fiscal year, or legislation creating the category has expired&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Date indicated = cut-off date that indicates a backlog; if the priority date (date the I-130 was filed) is BEFORE the date listed, one may apply for permanent residency&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Family-Based Preferences&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;First: Unmarried sons and daughters (i.e., children over 21 years of age) of U.S. citizens&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;2A:  Spouses and children (i.e., unmarried children under 21 years of age) of lawful permanent residents&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;2B:  Unmarried sons and daughters (i.e., children over 21 years of age) of lawful permanent residents&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Third:  Married sons and daughters of U.S. citizens&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Fourth:  Brothers and sisters of U.S. citizens&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Photo attribution: http://www.flickr.com/photos/8042373@N03/&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=/blog/EntryId/397/December-2010-Visa-Bulletin.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/397/December-2010-Visa-Bulletin.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">/blog/EntryId/397/December-2010-Visa-Bulletin.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 20:37:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=397</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>USCIS Applies Updated Fee Schedule and Forms</title>
      <link>/blog/EntryId/396/USCIS-Applies-Updated-Fee-Schedule-and-Forms.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt="naturalization" align="left" src="/Portals/16/media/money_fee increase.jpg" /&gt; November 23, 2010 marks the hard start of when the USCIS (United States Citizenship and Immigration Services) will begin collecting fees according to their latest fee adjustment and release both new and revised forms for immigrant applications and petitions.   This same day also presents a milestone for the first-ever Fee Waiver Request Form, meant to provide standardization and instruction on how waiver approvals are accepted.  Applications and petitions postmarked on or after Nov. 23, 2010 must include this updated fee or a fee waiver request that is later approved.  &lt;a href="http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=5be73dc5cb93b210VgnVCM100000082ca60aRCRD&amp;vgnextchannel=8a2f6d26d17df110VgnVCM1000004718190aRCRD"&gt;View the complete and updated fee schedule.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Below is a snapshot of the&lt;em&gt; revised &lt;/em&gt;forms and instructions:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Form I-129, Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker&lt;/strong&gt;:  Includes supplementary questions to help USCIS define eligibility.  Previous form versions accepted through December 22, 2010. &lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Form I-129S, Nonimmigrant Petition Based on Blanket L Petition&lt;/strong&gt;:   Includes supplementary questions to conclude if the petitioner must submit $2,250 (required under Public Law 111-230). Previous form versions accepted through January 6, 2011. &lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Form I-212, Application for Permission to Reapply for Admission into the United States After Deportation or Removal&lt;/strong&gt;:  Revised form to help streamline the process for people seeking legal re-entry in the U.S. after deportation or removal.  Previous form versions accepted through January 6, 2011. &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Below is a snapshot of the &lt;em&gt;new&lt;/em&gt; forms and instructions:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Form I-912, Request for Fee Waiver&lt;/strong&gt;:  Will provide a straightforward and consistent method to request fee waivers and describe documentation requirements.  Form can be submitted for both the filing fee and any associated biometrics fee.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Form I-924, Application for Regional Center Under the Immigrant Investor Pilot Program&lt;/strong&gt;:  Provides clear requirements, streamlines application process for Regional Center designation, and promotes consistency in the adjudication process.  Form must be filed by Designated Regional Centers on or before December 29, 2011, and each subsequent year.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Other&lt;/em&gt; noteworthy changes include:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Form I-765, Application for Employment Authorization&lt;/strong&gt;:  The fee for Form I-765 has increased from $340 to $380. Those who plan to work in the U.S. and are registering for Temporary Protected Status (TPS) – are required to pay the new fee (or request a fee waiver).  TPS applicants who do not plan to work in the U.S. must still submit the form but need not pay the fee.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Form I-131, Application for Travel Document&lt;/strong&gt;:  The fee for Form I- 131 has increased from $305 to $360 (exceptions apply).  Adults applying for Refugee Travel Documents pay $135 and children (under the age of 16) pay $105.  Refer to I -131 form instructions to determine if $85 biometrics fee applies.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;E-Filing&lt;/strong&gt;:  Electronic applications filed on or after Nov. 23, 2010 require new fee.  Fee waiver applicants and expedited processing is not available through e-filing (except Form I-907).&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The USCIS first proposed the fee schedule in the Federal Register on June 11, 2010, and on &lt;a href="http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/188/Non-Immigrant-Fees-to-Increase-by-10.aspx"&gt;September 23, 2010&lt;/a&gt;, they formerly announced that they would release a new schedule to be effective on November 23, 2010. This implementation increases overall fees by 10% on average and is primarily a result of the current fee structure not fully covering the cost of the immigration services provided.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Photo attribution: &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/pfala/"&gt;http://www.flickr.com/photos/pfala/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=/blog/EntryId/396/USCIS-Applies-Updated-Fee-Schedule-and-Forms.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/396/USCIS-Applies-Updated-Fee-Schedule-and-Forms.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">/blog/EntryId/396/USCIS-Applies-Updated-Fee-Schedule-and-Forms.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 22:34:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=396</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Immigration Faces New Obstacles with a Power Shift in Congress</title>
      <link>/blog/EntryId/395/Immigration-Faces-New-Obstacles-with-a-Power-Shift-in-Congress.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;img alt="naturalization" align="left" src="/Portals/16/media/obstacle.jpg" /&gt;
The November 2010 mid-term elections exposed voter frustration as a rebalance of power in the previously democratic-controlled House of Representatives and Senate came to fruition.  The tentative outcome grants Republicans power in the House of Representatives but not in the Senate, and although the Democrats retain majority in the Senate, they’ve lost a significant number of seats.  These final results may not be confirmed until January 2011, when congress is sworn in, due to the outcome of a number of races still pending.  With a divided congress, it is no secret that most believe immigration will have trouble moving forward in the upcoming year or until one party retakes power.   The first opportunity to substantiate that claim may arrive sooner than expected in the ongoing lame duck session, when Senator Harry Reid will reintroduce the heavily debated DREAM Act.  President Obama is supporting the initiative and announced to the democratic members of congress last week that he wants the bill passed during lame duck as a “down payment” on progression towards immigration reform.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Many new leaders in the House radically oppose left-wing views on immigration, relentlessly voicing their plan to drive forward an enforcement-only strategy.  Nevertheless, Republicans are not ignoring immigration completely – certain matters have already sparked conversation among the newly-elected and those republicans in support of matters surrounding immigration, such as employer accountability and visa cap lifts.  
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The DREAM Act would be a stand-alone bill that, if passed, will provide a path to citizenship for young immigrants who graduate from high school and either attend college or opt to serve in the military. &lt;a href="http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/174/Rejuventating-the-DREAM-Act.aspx"&gt;Senator Harry Reid will lead the introduction of the DREAM Act&lt;/a&gt;, but he carries support from Senators Bob Menendez, Nydia Velasquez and Luis Gutierrez, who are prepared to meet resistance from the new inductees, who typically favor hard-line immigration policies like &lt;a href="http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/168/Restricted-Arizona-Law-SB-1070-Goes-Into-Effect-Today.aspx"&gt;Arizona’s SB 1070&lt;/a&gt;. A mindset that focuses on tight border security, strict enforcement and policies that allow states to police their own immigration alongside the federal government.  Even so, President Obama committed to make personal calls to resilient members of congress and stressing his allegiance to the bill.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Photo attribution: &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/vaguardpao/"&gt;http://www.flickr.com/photos/vaguardpao/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=/blog/EntryId/395/Immigration-Faces-New-Obstacles-with-a-Power-Shift-in-Congress.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/395/Immigration-Faces-New-Obstacles-with-a-Power-Shift-in-Congress.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">/blog/EntryId/395/Immigration-Faces-New-Obstacles-with-a-Power-Shift-in-Congress.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 21:51:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=395</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>H-1B Cap Count as of 11/19/2010</title>
      <link>/blog/EntryId/394/H-1B-Cap-Count-as-of-11-19-2010.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt="" align="left" src="/Portals/16/media/exclaimation mark.jpg" /&gt;The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) released H-1B cap numbers as of 11/19, receiving &lt;strong&gt;48,977&lt;/strong&gt; toward the 65,000 cap-subject H-1B petitions and &lt;strong&gt;17,832 &lt;/strong&gt;towards the 20,000 H-1B Master's category.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thus, H-1B cap numbers remain available, and there is still time to submit your FY2011 H-1B visa application for foreign national applicants beginning employment on October 1, 2010 or later.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Contact your immigration services provider to see if this is an option for you/your foreign national. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Photo attribution: http://www.flickr.com/photos/8042373@N03/&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=/blog/EntryId/394/H-1B-Cap-Count-as-of-11-19-2010.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/394/H-1B-Cap-Count-as-of-11-19-2010.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">/blog/EntryId/394/H-1B-Cap-Count-as-of-11-19-2010.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 21:31:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=394</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UK Increases Visa Fees to Balance Budget Deficit</title>
      <link>/blog/EntryId/393/UK-Increases-Visa-Fees-to-Balance-Budget-Deficit.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;img alt="naturalization" align="left" src="/Portals/16/media/flag.jpg" /&gt;
Another set of visa fee hikes for UK visa applications was scheduled to go into effect in November as an effort to reduce the nation’s budget deficit and preserve border cost security, but, a notice has been issued that the proposed fee increases will be postponed.   While the reasoning for the delay was not publicized, the fee increases are still expected to go into effect in the near future.  The November changes would be the second round to take effect after initial increases in October.  Last month’s fee changes remained at or below the cost of processing, despite changes of £400 in some areas; therefore subject to a negative parliamentary process (an automatic law unless challenged).   Conversely, the changes slated for November, are above the processing costs and subject to affirmative parliamentary procedure (law must be approved by both houses), quite possibly the reason for delay.
&lt;p&gt;While the changes are carried out, measured impact will be conducted over the next year by assessing any skill shortages, offshoring, or outflow of visa holders.  Rising costs can pose difficulties in forecasting revenue for the government as predicting migrant totals could be problematic. If they cannot recover the costs, the burden may fall onto the UK taxpayer.  Regardless of the risk, the UK government believes this structure will continue to fund border controls without inhibiting travel and immigration to the country.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Some of the fee increases are as follows:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Tier 1 (Gen, Investor, Ent) visa applications – from £690 to £750&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Tier 2 visa applications – from £270 to £350&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;UK Settlement Visa – from £644 to £750&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Naturalisation – from £735 to £780&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In addition to visa fee increases, parallel UK government bodies are experiencing a restructure to aid in balancing the budget deficit through spending cuts – welfare, counsel and police sectors are among the most affected.  The National Health Service and International Development divisions have been absolved along with Education, which only saw a 3.6 percent cut. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Photo attribution: &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/micora/"&gt;http://www.flickr.com/photos/micora/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=/blog/EntryId/393/UK-Increases-Visa-Fees-to-Balance-Budget-Deficit.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/393/UK-Increases-Visa-Fees-to-Balance-Budget-Deficit.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">/blog/EntryId/393/UK-Increases-Visa-Fees-to-Balance-Budget-Deficit.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 16:58:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=393</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Naturalization Certificate Redesigned to Deter Fraud</title>
      <link>/blog/EntryId/198/Naturalization-Certificate-Redesigned-to-Deter-Fraud.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;img border="0" align="left" src="/Portals/16/media/T--1_LEAD GENERATION-Social Media-blog-Blog pics-naturalizaton.jpg" alt="naturalization" class="alignLeft" /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In continued efforts to combat forgery and tampering of immigration documents, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) unveiled an enhanced Certificate of Naturalization (Form N-550) certificate that is received after taking the Oath of Allegiance to the United States and serves as evidence of citizenship. This security enhancement comes after the USCIS recently introduced a new, security-enhanced green card back in May, and showcases the USCIS’ continued commitment to improve the integrity of the immigration system.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The redesigned naturalization certificates include the following enhancements:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Embedded digitized photo and signature&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Background featuring color-shifting ink&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Certificates printed utilizing tamper-resistant technology&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;A standardized size of 8 ½ by 11 inches&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Automated production process&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While all previously issued Certificates of Naturalization will remain valid, USCIS expects that over 600,000 new citizens will receive the enhanced certificate over the next year.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Photo atttribution: &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/tzofia/"&gt;http://www.flickr.com/photos/tzofia/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=/blog/EntryId/198/Naturalization-Certificate-Redesigned-to-Deter-Fraud.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="tags"&gt;Tags: US Immigration Updates&lt;/div&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <guid isPermaLink="true">/blog/EntryId/198/Naturalization-Certificate-Redesigned-to-Deter-Fraud.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 19:06:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=198</trackback:ping>
      <blog:tag blog:url="http://www.visanow.com/blog/TagID/133.aspx">US Immigration Updates</blog:tag>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hospital to Pay Largest Civil Fine for I-9 Discrimination</title>
      <link>/blog/EntryId/197/Hospital-to-Pay-Largest-Civil-Fine-for-I-9-Discrimination.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img width="193" height="240" align="left" alt="" src="/Portals/16/media/money.jpg" /&gt;Catholic Healthcare West (CHW), the eighth-largest health system in the nation, resolved allegations with the Department of Justice last week for engaging in a pattern or practice of citizenship discrimination during the new hire I-9 process.   The terms of the settlement establish conclusive judgments that CHW mandated non-U.S. citizens and naturalized U.S. citizens to provide more work authorization documents than what is asked of native-born U.S. citizens and what is required by federal law.  Unfair documentary practice is prohibited by the Immigration and Nationality Act, whose objective is to prevent employers from discrimination based on the employee’s national origin or citizenship status.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;**Register for VISANOW’s upcoming HR.com webcast to &lt;a title="learn more about I-9s and avoiding discrimination " target="_blank" href="http://www.hr.com/stories/1288038002966"&gt;learn more about I-9s and avoiding discrimination/non-compliance &lt;/a&gt;on November 18.**&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CHW’s indictment will cost them $257,000 in civil penalties as well as $1,000 in back pay to the charging party.   This settlement is the largest civil fine ever to be paid out in accordance with I-9 discriminatory allegations.  Over and above the fine, CHW will also be completing an I-9 review of its 41 facilities to identify all possible cases of over-documentation and will pay damages to any employees who lost wages as a result.  Further, CHW plans to train its HR staff on nondiscriminatory recruitment procedures and carrying out best practices with regard to employment eligibility verification.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Organizations like CHW and others in the healthcare, hospitality, agriculture and landscaping industries, are more susceptible to I-9 issues because of their size and/or diverse workforce.  This same idea applies to employers who operate under shift work or part-time schedules.  The Justice Department has stressed the importance of following anti-discriminatory practices through their upsurge in high-profile investigations of employers such as Macys, Morton’s Steakhouse and the John Jay college of Criminal Justice. Similarly, Immigrations and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is increasing their employer I-9 audits for administrative errors due to the government push to hold employers accountable for illegal immigration; an approach that earned fines for companies like Abercrombie and Fitch, Krispy Kreme, and American Apparel.  To guarantee your company is staying I-9 compliant, employers should consider an electronic I-9 system, which can prevent over-documentation and introduce educational tools for training programs and procedures.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Photo attribution:  &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/dborman2/"&gt;http://www.flickr.com/photos/dborman2/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=/blog/EntryId/197/Hospital-to-Pay-Largest-Civil-Fine-for-I-9-Discrimination.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="tags"&gt;Tags: Employment Eligibility&lt;/div&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/197/Hospital-to-Pay-Largest-Civil-Fine-for-I-9-Discrimination.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">/blog/EntryId/197/Hospital-to-Pay-Largest-Civil-Fine-for-I-9-Discrimination.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 19:04:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=197</trackback:ping>
      <blog:tag blog:url="http://www.visanow.com/blog/TagID/136.aspx">Employment Eligibility</blog:tag>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>H-1B Cap Count as of 10/22/2010</title>
      <link>/blog/EntryId/199/H-1B-Cap-Count-as-of-10-22-2010.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img width="240" height="180" align="left" alt="" src="/Portals/16/media/exclaimation mark.jpg" /&gt;The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) released H-1B cap numbers as of 10/22, receiving &lt;strong&gt;44,300&lt;/strong&gt; toward the 65,000 cap-subject H-1B petitions and &lt;strong&gt;16,200 &lt;/strong&gt;towards the 20,000 H-1B Master's category.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thus, H-1B cap numbers remain available, and there is still time to submit your FY2011 H-1B visa application for foreign national applicants beginning employment on October 1, 2010 or later.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Contact your immigration services provider to see if this is an option for you/your foreign national or learn more about &lt;a target="_new" href="http://immigration.visanow.com/form_H-1B-Best-Practices/"&gt;best practices for preparing your FY2011 H-1B application&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Photo attribution: http://www.flickr.com/photos/8042373@N03/&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=/blog/EntryId/199/H-1B-Cap-Count-as-of-10-22-2010.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="tags"&gt;Tags: US Immigration Updates&lt;/div&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/199/H-1B-Cap-Count-as-of-10-22-2010.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">/blog/EntryId/199/H-1B-Cap-Count-as-of-10-22-2010.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 19:21:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=199</trackback:ping>
      <blog:tag blog:url="http://www.visanow.com/blog/TagID/133.aspx">US Immigration Updates</blog:tag>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Candidates Use Immigration to Try to Garner Votes</title>
      <link>/blog/EntryId/195/Candidates-Use-Immigration-to-Try-to-Garner-Votes.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img width="240" height="175" align="left" alt="" src="/Portals/16/media/campaign signs1.jpg" /&gt;As we approach the final stretch of campaigning for mid-term elections, it’s impossible to avoid the ad attacks invading various media outlets throughout the nation.   Immigration is one of the issues that has been the subject of many recent ad attacks. Candidates are quickly pointing fingers at opponents who either support or neglect immigration reform and construct a conflicting argument.  Since Arizona adopted a controversial immigration law in April 2010, immigration reform was mixed back into the national conversation&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;and became a dividing issue for the midterm elections.   The current economic climate, coupled with increased violence in Mexico, has justified many candidates’ reasoning for opposing immigration reform and using it as a headliner in the upcoming election.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Historically, the strategy of running anti-immigration policies has backfired for candidates in the past.  If we look at 2006, when immigration was at the forefront of the agenda with a firm and negative bill in the House (the Sensenbrenner Bill), not a single candidate who ran strict anti-immigration campaigns got elected to the House that year (included representatives from Arizona, North Carolina and other southern states).  Still, even with the historical data, many candidates are currently following the same trend in states like Louisiana, Nevada and Idaho for the 2010 election.  Experts conclude these tactics will alienate Hispanic electorates and may cause the election to swing in favor of the opposing candidate.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;According to the census data, Asian and Latino voters now account for 1 in 10 registered voters in the U.S., therefore, a candidate regarded as anti-immigrant is not likely to earn their votes.  With so many recent elections being determined by a marginal amount of votes, the population of new U.S. citizens is too often undervalued.   New Americans are registering to vote at a steady rate and of those registered, a high percentage is actually getting to the polls.   The exponential growth of this decade is likely to continue for future elections.  Immigrants hold the right to vote as a sacred privilege and because they are here by choice, new citizens tend to want to show their patriotism and carryout the freedoms they’ve longed to have.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Photo attribution:  &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/wfiupublicradio/"&gt;http://www.flickr.com/photos/wfiupublicradio/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=/blog/EntryId/195/Candidates-Use-Immigration-to-Try-to-Garner-Votes.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="tags"&gt;Tags: US Immigration Updates&lt;/div&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/195/Candidates-Use-Immigration-to-Try-to-Garner-Votes.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">/blog/EntryId/195/Candidates-Use-Immigration-to-Try-to-Garner-Votes.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 18:58:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=195</trackback:ping>
      <blog:tag blog:url="http://www.visanow.com/blog/TagID/133.aspx">US Immigration Updates</blog:tag>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>I-9 Compliance Critical for Small Businesses Too</title>
      <link>/blog/EntryId/194/I-9-Compliance-Critical-for-Small-Businesses-Too.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img width="240" height="180" align="left" alt="" src="/Portals/16/media/mom n pop store.jpg" /&gt;Fiscal year 2011 is now underway and the government’s strategy shift in immigration enforcement is ongoing as the ICE (United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement) released record-breaking figures revealing the &lt;a title="highest deportation numbers and the most employer audits in our nation’s history" target="_self" href="http://www.ice.gov/news/releases/1010/101006washingtondc2.htm"&gt;highest deportation numbers and the most employer audits in our nation’s history&lt;/a&gt;.  The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announced a goal back in 2009 to focus accountability on employers, who they believe are the root of the illegal immigration problem.   While the system is designed to prosecute businesses that consciously hire illegal immigrants, many of the audits have resulted in fines for respectable employers and small businesses that unknowingly filled out I-9 forms incorrectly, immigrant and non-immigrant employers alike.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Obama administration has made drastic changes since the presidency of George W. Bush, who focused on tracking down the workers themselves and arresting on the spot.  These workplace raids were costly and gained criticism about their efficiency and parity.   The new objective is to reduce the supply that attracts undocumented workers from the get-go, with a cost-effective and evenhanded process.   &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The ICE I-9 compliance audits are division of this objective that are affecting small businesses and “good” employers in the same capacity that it is with large enterprises and those who employ immigrants.   Simple clerical errors such as missing dates or signatures on I-9s have resulted in fines from $110 to $1100 per error.  Many companies are opting to use third party providers who will manage the I-9 compliance and guarantee accuracy.  Making this move has proven to help in the event of an audit, as it demonstrates an attempt on the employer’s behalf to follow protocol.   Small businesses may be wary of spending the extra dollars on these services, but the cost is minimal in comparison to the sizable fines being issued.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One of the many examples of violations is a restaurant franchisee from Colorado who owns three stores and was fined $32,000 due to an ICE inspection.  He never hired any illegal workers but he made simple errors on the I-9 forms.  The ICE reported that since January 2009, they have audited more than 3,200 employers, debarred 225 companies and individuals, and imposed approximately $50 million in financial sanctions – more than the total amount of audits and debarments than during the entire previous Bush administration. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Photo attribution: &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/dalechumbley/"&gt;http://www.flickr.com/photos/dalechumbley/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=/blog/EntryId/194/I-9-Compliance-Critical-for-Small-Businesses-Too.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="tags"&gt;Tags: Employment Eligibility&lt;/div&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/194/I-9-Compliance-Critical-for-Small-Businesses-Too.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">/blog/EntryId/194/I-9-Compliance-Critical-for-Small-Businesses-Too.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2010 18:56:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=194</trackback:ping>
      <blog:tag blog:url="http://www.visanow.com/blog/TagID/136.aspx">Employment Eligibility</blog:tag>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>November 2010 Visa Bulletin</title>
      <link>/blog/EntryId/193/November-2010-Visa-Bulletin.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;img height="160" border="0" align="left" width="240" alt="Visa Bulletin" src="/Portals/16/media/VB image.jpg" /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The November 2010 Visa Bulletin shows some measured progress, signaling that Fiscal Year 2011 may be one of relatively slow advancement.  In contrast, the priority date for spouses and children of lawful permanent residents confirms speculation that the category may become current relatively soon.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the employment-based Visa Bulletin, every category showed at least a week or two of progress except for the EB second preference category for Indian nationals.  This is the third month in a row where the cut-off date for that category has held at 05/08/2006.  This most likely indicates that the government is still working to clear out the backlog of green card applications for those whose priority dates are now current.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Meanwhile, the other categories show small gains:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Chinese nationals in the EB-2 category moved ahead by 10 days, to 06/01/2010.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;In the EB third preference category, all countries except India and Mexico moved forward by 2 weeks.  China now stands at 11/22/2003; and all other countries, including the Philippines, 01/22/2005.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Indian nationals saw a small move forward by 1 week to 01/22/2002, and Mexicans moved by 9 days to 05/01/2001.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;The EB-3 Other Workers category also finally saw some progress.  All nationals except Indians and Mexicans moved ahead by 10 days, to 04/01/2003.  Indian Other Workers moved ahead by 1 week to 01/22/2002 (continuing to parallel the progress of the EB-3 professional category), and Mexicans moved ahead by 9 days to 05/01/2001.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Recent updates by Charles Oppenheim, Chief of the Immigrant Visa Control and Reporting Division at the U.S. Department of State (DOS), also give us further insight into the DOS’s view into how far dates will advance this year.  Current speculations have EB-2 for India and China and most of the EB-3 categories moving at about the rate of 1 to 2 weeks per bulletin this fiscal year.  They anticipate Mexico will reach the year 2002.  Mr. Oppenheimer also repeated his call for legislative action to deal with the situation for Indian nationals in EB-3.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In comparison, the family-based visa bulletin continues to advance at a fairly good pace.  Most categories moved ahead by 1 or 2 months:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;In the FB first preference category, Mexicans and Filipinos nationals received the benefit for once, advancing 1 week to 12/22/1992 and 1 month to 04/01/1997 respectively.  All other countries remained at the same cutoff dates in the previous bulletin.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;FB-2A continues to advance rapidly in defiance of conventional wisdom.  All countries advanced by 2 months to 06/01/2010, except for Mexico which advanced by 2 months to 03/01/2010.  Mr. Oppenheimer confirmed that at this pace, this category could be current sometime early next year.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;FB-2B also advanced by 2 months for nationals of all countries, except Mexico and the Philippines, to 06/01/2005.  Mexico remained at 06/22/1992 and the Philippines stayed at 09/01/2002.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Similarly, FB-3 advanced by 1 month for nationals of all countries, except Mexico and the Philippines, to 06/01/2002.  Mexico remained at 10/22/1992 and the Philippines stayed at 03/01/1995.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;All nationals except Filipinos saw advancements in the FB-4 category.  Mexicans moved ahead by 1 week to 12/15/1995 and all other countries moved ahead by 1 month to 01/01/2002.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It is definitely good news that the family-based priority dates are advancing well, but perhaps the best news is the fact that the backlog of cases for spouses of green card holders is nearly cleared.  It helps to alleviate the concerns of those newly adjusted permanent residents who fear their families cannot file their following-to-join green card application in time.  This could have tremendous implications in terms of opportunities for foreign nationals to seek permanent residency through family-based sponsorship. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Employment-Based Visa Bulletin for November 2010&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img height="513" border="0" align="left" width="507" alt="snippet visa bulletin nov 10" src="/Portals/16/media/snippet visa bulletin nov 10.PNG" /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Legend&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;C = current as there is no waiting period necessary to file for permanent residency&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;U = unavailable as visa supply has been exhausted for the remainder of fiscal year, or legislation creating the category has expired&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Date indicated = cut-off date that indicates a backlog; if the priority date (date the labor certification or I-140 was filed, depending on the type of case) is &lt;em&gt;BEFORE&lt;/em&gt; the date listed, one may apply for permanent residency&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Employment-Based Preferences&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;First&lt;/em&gt;: Priority Workers&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;Second&lt;/em&gt;:  Members of the Professions Holding Advanced Degrees or Persons of Exceptional Ability&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;Third&lt;/em&gt;:  Skilled Workers, Professionals, and Other Workers&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;Fourth&lt;/em&gt;:  Certain Special Immigrants&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;Fifth&lt;/em&gt;:  Employment Creation&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
&lt;div&gt; &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Family-Based Visa Bulletin for November 2010&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Legend&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;C = current as there is no waiting period necessary to file for permanent residency&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;U = unavailable as visa supply has been exhausted for the remainder of fiscal year, or legislation creating the category has expired&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Date indicated = cut-off date that indicates a backlog; if the priority date (date the I-130 was filed) is &lt;em&gt;BEFORE&lt;/em&gt;the date listed, one may apply for permanent residency&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Family-Based Preferences&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;First&lt;/em&gt;: Unmarried sons and daughters (i.e., children over 21 years of age) of U.S. citizens&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;2A&lt;/em&gt;:  Spouses and children (i.e., unmarried children under 21 years of age) of lawful permanent residents&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;2B&lt;/em&gt;:  Unmarried sons and daughters (i.e., children over 21 years of age) of lawful permanent residents&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;Third&lt;/em&gt;:  Married sons and daughters of U.S. citizens&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;Fourth&lt;/em&gt;:  Brothers and sisters of U.S. citizens&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By: Emily C. &lt;br /&gt;
Photo attribution: &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/secret_canadian"&gt;http://www.flickr.com/photos/secret_canadian&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=/blog/EntryId/193/November-2010-Visa-Bulletin.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="tags"&gt;Tags: US Immigration Updates&lt;/div&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/193/November-2010-Visa-Bulletin.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">/blog/EntryId/193/November-2010-Visa-Bulletin.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 18:54:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=193</trackback:ping>
      <blog:tag blog:url="http://www.visanow.com/blog/TagID/133.aspx">US Immigration Updates</blog:tag>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>H-1B Cap Count as of 10/8/2010</title>
      <link>/blog/EntryId/192/H-1B-Cap-Count-as-of-10-8-2010.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img width="240" height="180" align="left" alt="" src="/Portals/16/media/exclaimation mark.jpg" /&gt;The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) released H-1B cap numbers as of 10/8, receiving &lt;strong&gt;41,900&lt;/strong&gt; toward the 65,000 cap-subject H-1B petitions and &lt;strong&gt;15,400 &lt;/strong&gt;towards the 20,000 H-1B Master's category.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thus, H-1B cap numbers remain available, and there is still time to submit your FY2011 H-1B visa application for foreign national applicants beginning employment on October 1, 2010 or later.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Contact your immigration services provider to see if this is an option for you/your foreign national or learn more about &lt;a target="_new" href="http://immigration.visanow.com/form_H-1B-Best-Practices/"&gt;best practices for preparing your FY2011 H-1B application&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Photo attribution: http://www.flickr.com/photos/8042373@N03/&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=/blog/EntryId/192/H-1B-Cap-Count-as-of-10-8-2010.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/192/H-1B-Cap-Count-as-of-10-8-2010.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">/blog/EntryId/192/H-1B-Cap-Count-as-of-10-8-2010.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 17:58:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=192</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Senators Bring Immigration Reform Back to the Table</title>
      <link>/blog/EntryId/191/Senators-Bring-Immigration-Reform-Back-to-the-Table.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img border="0" alt="CIR" class="alignLeft" style="float: left;" src="/Portals/16/media/statue of liberty.jpg" /&gt;At the end of September, Senators Robert Menendez of New Jersey and Patrick Leahy of Vermont introduced an expansive immigration bill that aims to revitalize the nation’s immigration system and offer a comprehensive solution to the 11 million illegal immigrants currently in the United States.  The bill highlights six general categories including border, interior, and worksite enforcement policy, a legalization program for undocumented citizens, employment and family based immigration, and an immigrant integration system. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Even though both political parties have acknowledged a need to re-establish the current shortcomings in the system, many concede that the bill has a marginal chance of reaching a vote due to the timing of the upcoming elections and the controversy involved.  The Democratic leaders may be using this action to reinforce their pro-immigration partisan views but they will be prepared to move the bill in the event that opportunity exists. Flow of undocumented citizens has declined and deportation of illegal immigrants is at an all-time high, however, the economy’s long-term recovery is dependent on a tangible solution.     &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;S.B. 3932, &lt;em&gt;The Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2010 &lt;/em&gt;would allow a legalization opportunity for undocumented, non-criminal, immigrants living in the United States through a temporary designation called Lawful Prospective Immigrant.  Once registered, this legalization would sanction work and travel authorization for the immigrant. Eligibility status would be extended to spouses and children living in the U.S. or abroad, as legalized dependents.   Also under the bill, employers will be required to use an employment verification system and visa expirations will be more closely monitored. Border security would be enhanced through infrastructure improvements, officer training and law clarification.  The Menendez-Leahy bill is preceded by a similar House immigration bill, CIR ASAP (&lt;a href="http://immigrationimpact.com/2009/12/15/congressman-luis-gutierrez-introduces-comprehensive-immigration-reform-for-america%E2%80%99s-security-and-prosperity-act-of-2009/"&gt;HR 4321&lt;/a&gt;), introduced by Rep. Solomon Ortiz (D-TX) and Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D-IL) last year.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a title="Read a summary of bill S.B. 3932" target="_blank" href="http://www.immigrationpolicy.org/just-facts/comprehensive-immigration-reform-act-2010-summary"&gt;Read a summary of bill S.B. 3932&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Photo attribution: &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/davidprior/"&gt;http://www.flickr.com/photos/davidprior/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=/blog/EntryId/191/Senators-Bring-Immigration-Reform-Back-to-the-Table.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="tags"&gt;Tags: US Immigration Reform&lt;/div&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/191/Senators-Bring-Immigration-Reform-Back-to-the-Table.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">/blog/EntryId/191/Senators-Bring-Immigration-Reform-Back-to-the-Table.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 17:56:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=191</trackback:ping>
      <blog:tag blog:url="http://www.visanow.com/blog/TagID/135.aspx">US Immigration Reform</blog:tag>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>October 2010 Visa Bulletin</title>
      <link>/blog/EntryId/190/October-2010-Visa-Bulletin.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;img height="160" border="0" align="left" width="240" src="/Portals/16/media/VB image.jpg" alt="Visa Bulletin" /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The first Visa Bulletin of Fiscal Year 2011 has been released and been met with some relief.  There were widespread concerns there would be some degree of retrogression (i.e., backwards movement in priority dates), especially in the second employment-based category for Indian and Chinese nationals after all of the unused immigrant visa numbers for other countries were no longer available.  However, this month’s bulletin confirms continued forward movement.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the employment-based Visa Bulletin, every category either remained at the same cutoff date or moved forward:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;In the EB second preference category, China moved ahead by 2 weeks, to 05/22/2006, while India remained steady at 05/08/2006. &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While EB-2 for India did not move forward, the good news is that the dates did not retrogress.  It remains to be seen, though, whether the government was efficient enough in clearing up the backlog of EB-2 cases for Indian and Chinese nationals to that date.  If demand exceeds the new supply, this will be evidenced by future backward movement of dates.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;In the EB third preference category, all countries except China, India, and Mexico moved forward by 3 weeks to 01/08/2006.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Chinese and Indian nationals in the EB-3 category each saw a move forward of 2 weeks, to 11/08/2003 and 01/15/2002, respectively.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;After unexpectedly running out of numbers in early FY 2010, Mexico finally returns to EB-3 at 04/22/2001.  This is well behind 07/01/2002, the cutoff date in the April 2010 Visa Bulletin, which was the last time immigrant visa numbers were available to EB-3 Mexican nationals.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;The EB-3 Other Workers category remained at 03/22/2203 for all nationals except those from India and Mexico.  India is now at 01/15/2002 – a progression of 2 weeks – and Mexico has returned to the board at 04/22/2001.  For Mexico, this is behind the cutoff of 06/021/2001 in the April 2010 Visa Bulletin.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One issue that will be of some interest in FY 2011 is whether the cutoff dates will remain the same for many months, then suddenly surge forward, as they did last year.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;VISANOW is pleased to also begin providing coverage of the family-based Visa Bulletin.  This bulletin, which covers family-based immigration numbers, also saw interesting developments in FY 2010.  At the start of FY 2011, here is where the numbers stand:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;In the FB first preference category, all foreign nationals except Mexicans and Filipinos saw their cutoff dates move ahead by 1½ months to 02/15/20016.  Mexico moved ahead by 2 weeks, to 12/15/1992, and the Philippines moved ahead by 2 months, to 03/01/1997.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;FB-2A continues its unexpected progression through priority dates in 2010.  All countries moved ahead by 3 months to 04/01/2010, except for Mexico, which actually moved ahead by 1 year, to 01/01/2010.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;FB-2B saw mostly healthy gains: all countries except Mexico and the Philippines moved ahead by 3 months to 04/01/2005; Mexico progressed by 1 week to 06/22/1992; and the Philippines’s date moved ahead by 1 month to 09/01/2002.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;In the FB third category, all foreign nationals except Mexicans and Filipinos saw a move forward of 2 months to 05/01/2002.  Mexican and Filipino nationals enjoyed pretty healthy gains in this category, to 10/22/1992 (almost 8 months) and 03/01/1995 (3 months), respectively.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;In the FB fourth preference category, almost all countries moved ahead by 1½ months to 12/01/2001.  Filipino nationals moved ahead by 3 months to 04/01/1991. &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mexicans in this category saw a gigantic leap forward of almost 2 years, from 01/01/1994 to 12/08/1995.  This is a return, however, to where the date was in the June 2010 Visa Bulletin; the dates retrogressed in the last quarter of FY 2010.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;The Dominican Republic is no longer treated as a separate chargeability area.  However, if demand in that country continues to outstrip supply, we could see this country return to the bulletin in the future.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Employment-Based Visa Bulletin for September 2010&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;img height="513" border="0" align="left" width="507" src="/Portals/16/media/snippet visa bulletin nov 10.PNG" style="float: left;" class="alignLeft" alt="October EB-VB" /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Legend&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;C = current as there is no waiting period necessary to file the I-485&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;U = unavailable as visa supply has been exhausted for the remainder of fiscal year, or legislation creating the category has expired&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Date indicated = cut-off date that indicates a backlog; if the priority date (date the labor certification or I-140 was filed, depending on the type of case) is &lt;em&gt;BEFORE&lt;/em&gt; date listed, the I-485 can be filed&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Employment-based Preferences&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;First&lt;/em&gt;: Priority Workers&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;Second&lt;/em&gt;:  Members of the Professions Holding Advanced Degrees or Persons of Exceptional Ability&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;Third&lt;/em&gt;:  Skilled Workers, Professionals, and Other Workers&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;Fourth&lt;/em&gt;:  Certain Special Immigrants&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;Fifth&lt;/em&gt;:  Employment Creation&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Family-Based Visa Bulletin for October 2010&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img height="256" border="0" align="left" width="501" src="/Portals/16/media/snippet visa bulletin family nov 10.PNG" style="float: left;" class="alignLeft" alt="FB=VB 2010" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Legend&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;C = current as there is no waiting period necessary to file the I-485&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;U = unavailable as visa supply has been exhausted for the remainder of fiscal year, or legislation creating the category has expired&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Date indicated = cut-off date that indicates a backlog; if the priority date (date the I-130 was filed case) is &lt;em&gt;BEFORE&lt;/em&gt; date listed, the I-485 can be filed&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Family-Based Preferences&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;First&lt;/em&gt;: Unmarried sons and daughters (i.e., children over 21 years of age) of U.S. citizens&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;2A&lt;/em&gt;:  Spouses and children (i.e., unmarried children under 21 years of age) of lawful permanent residents&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;2B&lt;/em&gt;:  Unmarried sons and daughters (i.e., children over 21 years of age) of lawful permanent residents&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;Third&lt;/em&gt;:  Married sons and daughters of U.S. citizens&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;Fourth&lt;/em&gt;:  Brothers and sisters of U.S. citizens&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By: Emily C. &lt;br /&gt;
Photo attribution: &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/secret_canadian"&gt;http://www.flickr.com/photos/secret_canadian&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=/blog/EntryId/190/October-2010-Visa-Bulletin.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/190/October-2010-Visa-Bulletin.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">/blog/EntryId/190/October-2010-Visa-Bulletin.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 17:55:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=190</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Protect your Personal or Employee’s Immigration Data</title>
      <link>/blog/EntryId/189/Protect-your-Personal-or-Employee-s-Immigration-Data.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;img height="143" border="0" align="left" width="240" alt="U   MARKETING 1 LEAD GENERATION Social Media blog 2870445260 82be0db1db m IT" class="alignLeft" style="float: left;" src="/Portals/16/media/U--_MARKETING-1_LEAD GENERATION-Social Media-blog-2870445260_82be0db1db_m_IT.jpg" /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It is difficult to imagine an activity that involves disclosing more personal information to more people than applying for a visa.  Your recent addresses, employment history, financial compensation, social security number and dependent names are just some examples of information certain visas require.  While the visa application process requires this information, corporations and individuals are becoming increasingly sensitive to employee’s privacy concerns and liability from breaches of data security.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What can you do to protect your employee’s personal data?  Most importantly, understand what information is being requested and why.  Then only provide that information.  Too often immigration service providers request more information than needed.  By understanding what and why something is needed, you reduce the risk of providing and entrusting the information unnecessarily.  Avoid communicating sensitive data and documents insecurely through methods like e-mail and ensure that data and documents are transmitted securely.  Most importantly, work with immigration service providers who are committed to securing your physical documents and electronic information in accordance with best practices in data security.  Verify their claims by asking who has access to your information, how that information is restricted and how long it is retained. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;VISANOW practices good data security by using a multi-faceted encryption approach for authorization and authentication of customers and encrypting all data at-rest and in transit. Learn more about &lt;a title="VISANOW's security overview" target="_blank" href="http://www.visanow.com/resources/VISANOW_Security_Overview.pdf"&gt;VISANOW's security features&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Learn more about &lt;a title="how to protect data and good end-user security practices from the Federal Trade Commission" target="_blank" href="http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/edu/multimedia/interactive/infosecurity/index.html"&gt;how to protect data and good end-user security practices from the Federal Trade Commission&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
By: Ryan McFarland&lt;br /&gt;
Photo attribution: &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/purpleslog/"&gt;http://www.flickr.com/photos/purpleslog/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=/blog/EntryId/189/Protect-your-Personal-or-Employee-s-Immigration-Data.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="tags"&gt;Tags: Corporate Immigration Best Practices&lt;/div&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/189/Protect-your-Personal-or-Employee-s-Immigration-Data.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">/blog/EntryId/189/Protect-your-Personal-or-Employee-s-Immigration-Data.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 17:53:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=189</trackback:ping>
      <blog:tag blog:url="http://www.visanow.com/blog/TagID/137.aspx">Corporate Immigration Best Practices</blog:tag>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Non-Immigrant Fees to Increase by 10%</title>
      <link>/blog/EntryId/188/Non-Immigrant-Fees-to-Increase-by-10.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;img height="240" border="0" align="left" width="204" src="/Portals/16/media/money_fee increase.jpg" alt="Consular processing fee increase" /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On September 23, 2010, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced that they will increase non-immigrant visa fees, excluding those for the naturalization process.  The USCIS first proposed this in the Federal Register on June 11, 2010, and is in addition to the fee increase for non-immigrant consular processing services back in July. The fee increases are due to the current fee structure not fully covering the cost of the immigration services provided. This rule will increase overall fees by 10% on average, and will go into effect on November 23, 2010.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We believe that the proposed fee increases will not negatively impact the number of applications filed.  The increased cost is marginal compared to the benefit of recruiting exceptional international talent. &lt;a href="http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=5be73dc5cb93b210VgnVCM100000082ca60aRCRD&amp;vgnextchannel=68439c7755cb9010VgnVCM10000045f3d6a1RCRD" target="_blank" title="View the new fee schedule for nonimmigrant visas"&gt;View the new fee schedule for nonimmigrant visas&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This rule comes in the wake of a finding that the U.S. Government is not fully covering its costs for the processing of these visas under the current cost structure. U.S. law requires the Department of State to attempt to recover the cost of processing non-immigrant visas through the collection of the application fees.  USCIS is a primarily fee-based organization, with about 90 percent of its budget coming from fees paid by applicants and petitioners for immigration benefits. The law requires USCIS to conduct fee reviews every two years to determine the funding levels necessary to administer the nation’s immigration laws, process immigration benefit requests and provide the infrastructure needed to support those activities. The final fee rule announced today concludes a comprehensive review begun in 2009.  USCIS’s fee revenue in fiscal years 2008 and 2009 was much lower than projected, and fee revenue in fiscal year 2010 remains low. While USCIS received appropriations from Congress and made budget cuts of approximately $160 million, this has not bridged the remaining gap between costs and anticipated revenue. A fee adjustment, as detailed in the final rule announced on September 23, 2010, is necessary to ensure USCIS recovers the costs of its operations while also meeting the application processing goals identified in the 2007 fee rule.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Photo attribution: &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/pfala/"&gt;http://www.flickr.com/photos/pfala/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=/blog/EntryId/188/Non-Immigrant-Fees-to-Increase-by-10.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="tags"&gt;Tags: US Immigration Updates&lt;/div&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/188/Non-Immigrant-Fees-to-Increase-by-10.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">/blog/EntryId/188/Non-Immigrant-Fees-to-Increase-by-10.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 17:51:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=188</trackback:ping>
      <blog:tag blog:url="http://www.visanow.com/blog/TagID/133.aspx">US Immigration Updates</blog:tag>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>H-1B Cap Count as of 9/24/2010</title>
      <link>/blog/EntryId/187/H-1B-Cap-Count-as-of-9-24-2010.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img width="240" height="180" align="left" alt="" src="/Portals/16/media/exclaimation mark.jpg" /&gt;&lt;img border="0" alt="" align="left" src="/Portals/16/images/exclaimation%20mark.jpg" /&gt;The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) released H-1B cap numbers as of 9/24, receiving &lt;strong&gt;39,600&lt;/strong&gt; toward the 65,000 cap-subject H-1B petitions and &lt;strong&gt;14,400&lt;/strong&gt; towards the 20,000 H-1B Master's category.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thus, H-1B cap numbers remain available, and there is still time to submit your FY2011 H-1B visa application for foreign national applicants beginning employment on October 1, 2010 or later.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Contact your immigration services provider to see if this is an option for you/your foreign national or learn more about &lt;a target="_new" href="http://immigration.visanow.com/form_H-1B-Best-Practices/"&gt;best practices for preparing your FY2011 H-1B application&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Photo attribution: http://www.flickr.com/photos/8042373@N03/&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=/blog/EntryId/187/H-1B-Cap-Count-as-of-9-24-2010.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="tags"&gt;Tags: US Immigration Updates&lt;/div&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/187/H-1B-Cap-Count-as-of-9-24-2010.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">/blog/EntryId/187/H-1B-Cap-Count-as-of-9-24-2010.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 17:50:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=187</trackback:ping>
      <blog:tag blog:url="http://www.visanow.com/blog/TagID/133.aspx">US Immigration Updates</blog:tag>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Senate Blocks Defense Bill and Dream Act</title>
      <link>/blog/EntryId/186/Senate-Blocks-Defense-Bill-and-Dream-Act.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img border="0" alt="Dreamact" hspace="3" vspace="3" style="float: left;" width="240" height="180" align="left" src="/Portals/16/media/Dreamact.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On Tuesday, &lt;a title="the Senate voted on whether to debate the 2011 defense authorization bill" target="_blank" href="http://immigration.visanow.com/blog/bid/46752/Senate-to-Vote-on-DREAM-Act-This-Week"&gt;the Senate voted on whether to debate the 2011 defense authorization bill&lt;/a&gt;, which included the DREAM Act and “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” repeal amendments. The defense bill did not receive the 60 votes needed to debate the bill (final vote was 56 to 43).  The Senate Republicans unanimously voted to block the bill, along with Senate Democrats Blanche Lincoln and Mark Pryor from Arkansas. Sen. John McCain, who led the GOP filibuster, blamed Sen. Harry Reid for the rejection of the defense bill by tacking on the additional amendments, which was a “blatant and cynical attempt to galvanize the Hispanic vote” and to “energize the gay and lesbian vote, in the case of ‘Don’t ask, don’t tell.’ ” Conversely, Sen. Reid accused Republicans of “putting partisan politics ahead of the best interests of the men and women who courageously defend our nation." &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the last minute, Majority Leader Sen. Harry Reid changed his vote to no, to be able to bring the bill back to the Senate floor at a later date, which may be after the November elections.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Photo attribution: &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/dreamactivistorg/"&gt;http://www.flickr.com/photos/dreamactivistorg/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=/blog/EntryId/186/Senate-Blocks-Defense-Bill-and-Dream-Act.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/186/Senate-Blocks-Defense-Bill-and-Dream-Act.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">/blog/EntryId/186/Senate-Blocks-Defense-Bill-and-Dream-Act.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 17:48:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=186</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>H-1B Cap Count as of 9/17/2010</title>
      <link>/blog/EntryId/185/H-1B-Cap-Count-as-of-9-17-2010.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img width="240" height="180" align="left" alt="" src="/Portals/16/media/exclaimation mark.jpg" /&gt;The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) released H-1B cap numbers as of 9/17, receiving &lt;strong&gt;38,300&lt;/strong&gt; toward the 65,000 cap-subject H-1B petitions and &lt;strong&gt;14,000&lt;/strong&gt; towards the 20,000 H-1B Master's category.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thus, H-1B cap numbers remain available, and there is still time to submit your FY2011 H-1B visa application for foreign national applicants beginning employment on October 1, 2010 or later.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Contact your immigration services provider to see if this is an option for you/your foreign national or learn more about &lt;a target="_new" href="http://immigration.visanow.com/form_H-1B-Best-Practices/"&gt;best practices for preparing your FY2011 H-1B application&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Photo attribution: http://www.flickr.com/photos/8042373@N03/&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=/blog/EntryId/185/H-1B-Cap-Count-as-of-9-17-2010.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="tags"&gt;Tags: US Immigration Updates&lt;/div&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/185/H-1B-Cap-Count-as-of-9-17-2010.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">/blog/EntryId/185/H-1B-Cap-Count-as-of-9-17-2010.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 17:46:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=185</trackback:ping>
      <blog:tag blog:url="http://www.visanow.com/blog/TagID/133.aspx">US Immigration Updates</blog:tag>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Senate to Vote on DREAM Act This Week</title>
      <link>/blog/EntryId/184/Senate-to-Vote-on-DREAM-Act-This-Week.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img border="0" alt="Dreamact" hspace="3" vspace="3" style="float: left;" width="240" height="180" align="left" src="/Portals/16/media/Dreamact.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As indicated last month, &lt;a title="Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid will push the DREAM Act separately" target="_blank" href="http://immigration.visanow.com/blog/bid/44705/Rejuventating-the-DREAM-Act"&gt;Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid will push the DREAM Act, separately from CIR&lt;/a&gt;. Reid has attached the DREAM Act as an amendment to the broader defense bill up for debate in the senate this week.  This will be the second time the DREAM Act has been voted upon (it fell 8 votes short of approval in an October 2007.)  The current defense bill also includes a repeal of the controversial “Don’t ask, don’t tell” provision.  Whether the bill has enough support to be approved remains uncertain. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Though not a replacement for comprehensive immigration reform, if approved, the DREAM Act would allow talented and educated young people an opportunity to obtain legal immigration status in a country that they grew up in—a country that, often, feels more like home than their country of origin.  This would mean a strengthening of the U.S. workforce and eventual long-term economic benefits to the U.S. economy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If passed, the DREAM (Development, Relief and Education for Alien Minors) Act would offer undocumented students the opportunity to earn conditional permanent residency, provided they entered the U.S. before age 16, have resided in the U.S. for at least 5 years, have earned their G.E.D., are of good moral character, and plan to attend at least 2 years of college or serve in the military for at least 2 years. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Photo attribution: &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/dreamactivistorg/"&gt;http://www.flickr.com/photos/dreamactivistorg/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=/blog/EntryId/184/Senate-to-Vote-on-DREAM-Act-This-Week.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/184/Senate-to-Vote-on-DREAM-Act-This-Week.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">/blog/EntryId/184/Senate-to-Vote-on-DREAM-Act-This-Week.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 17:44:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=184</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Additional Drone Now Patrols Southwest Border</title>
      <link>/blog/EntryId/183/Additional-Drone-Now-Patrols-Southwest-Border.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img width="180" height="240" align="left" alt="" src="/Portals/16/media/Border security.jpg" /&gt;The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announced today that Border Patrol Agents will be able to operate an additional Predator-B aircraft out of the Corpus Christi base. Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano urged, “With the deployment of the Predator in Texas, we will now be able to cover the southwest border from the El Centro sector in California all the way to the Gulf of Mexico in Texas, providing critical aerial surveillance assistance to personnel on the ground.” This is all part of DHS’ effort to increase and &lt;a title="improve security along the Mexican border" target="_blank" href="http://immigration.visanow.com/blog/bid/43238/New-Funding-and-Next-Steps-to-Secure-the-Southwest-Border"&gt;improve security along the Mexican border&lt;/a&gt;. In addition, the &lt;a title="emergency funding bill" target="_blank" href="http://immigration.visanow.com/blog/bid/45028/Increased-H-1B-L-1-Fees-to-Fund-Border-Security-Enhancements"&gt;emergency funding bill&lt;/a&gt; was signed last month by President Obama deploying additional National Guard troops to the Southwest Border as well.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Currently, DHS has three operational unmanned aircrafts monitoring the border and three more are expected to be deployed in early 2011. These predator drones can remain in the air for up to 30 hours and reach speeds of 250 knots. They are equipped with sensors that can monitor multiple targets at a time, making them an effective aerial support tool for Border Patrol Agents.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Photo attribution: &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/darwinbell/"&gt;http://www.flickr.com/photos/darwinbell/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=/blog/EntryId/183/Additional-Drone-Now-Patrols-Southwest-Border.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="tags"&gt;Tags: US Immigration Updates,US Immigration Reform&lt;/div&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/183/Additional-Drone-Now-Patrols-Southwest-Border.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">/blog/EntryId/183/Additional-Drone-Now-Patrols-Southwest-Border.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 17:43:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=183</trackback:ping>
      <blog:tag blog:url="http://www.visanow.com/blog/TagID/133.aspx">US Immigration Updates</blog:tag>
      <blog:tag blog:url="http://www.visanow.com/blog/TagID/135.aspx">US Immigration Reform</blog:tag>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Federal Reserve Study Concludes Immigration Boosts Economy</title>
      <link>/blog/EntryId/182/Federal-Reserve-Study-Concludes-Immigration-Boosts-Economy.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img width="240" height="160" align="left" alt="" src="/Portals/16/media/--Vfs01-users$-_MARKETING-LEAD GENERATION-Social Media-blog-fedreservebankofsf.jpg" /&gt;The Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco released a study entitled “&lt;a href="http://www.frbsf.org/publications/economics/letter/2010/el2010-26.html"&gt;The Effects of Immigrants on U.S. Employment and Productivity&lt;/a&gt;” this week, showing that immigration boosts the U.S. economy. Published by Giovanni Peri, an associate professor at the University of California-Davis and a visiting scholar at the San Francisco Fed, the study shows that immigration does not significantly impact the amount of jobs available to U.S.–born workers. Peri concludes that “there is no evidence that immigrants crowd out U.S.-born workers in either the short or long run.” More importantly, immigrants help boost salaries and productivity over time. Peri’s study shows that an inflow of immigrants equal to 1% of the increase in employment helps boost overall incomes by 0.6-0.9%. Therefore, from 1990-2007, immigration increased wages by $5,100 on average after adjusting for inflation (about 20-25% of the gain during this time frame).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Immigration increases the labor force, allows a company to expand and improve equipment while boosting economic productivity in the process. Peri’s research shows that, “immigrants expand the U.S. economy’s productive capacity, stimulate investment, and promote specialization that in the long run boosts productivity.” The author utilized a hypothetical example to illustrate his point – essentially, Peri explains that immigrants take entry level positions which increases the demand for more managers or supervisors, creates jobs and increases salaries over time.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Photo attribution: &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/wallyg/"&gt;http://www.flickr.com/photos/wallyg/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=/blog/EntryId/182/Federal-Reserve-Study-Concludes-Immigration-Boosts-Economy.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="tags"&gt;Tags: US Immigration Reform&lt;/div&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/182/Federal-Reserve-Study-Concludes-Immigration-Boosts-Economy.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">/blog/EntryId/182/Federal-Reserve-Study-Concludes-Immigration-Boosts-Economy.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 17:42:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=182</trackback:ping>
      <blog:tag blog:url="http://www.visanow.com/blog/TagID/135.aspx">US Immigration Reform</blog:tag>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>September 2010 Visa Bulletin </title>
      <link>/blog/EntryId/181/September-2010-Visa-Bulletin.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;style type="text/css"&gt;&lt;!--
.style1 {
 	BORDER-BOTTOM: #808080 1px solid; BORDER-LEFT: #808080 1px solid; BORDER-TOP: #808080 1px solid; FONT-WEIGHT: bold; BORDER-RIGHT: #808080 1px solid
 }
 .style2 {
 	BORDER-BOTTOM: #808080 1px solid; BORDER-LEFT: #808080 1px solid; BORDER-TOP: #808080 1px solid; BORDER-RIGHT: #808080 1px solid
 }
--&gt;&lt;/style&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img border="0" alt="Visa Bulletin" align="left" width="240" height="160" src="/Portals/16/media/VB image.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The September Visa Bulletin is the last one in the immigration fiscal year, and this year ends on a strong note: the EB second preference category for China and India progressed to almost mid-2006, the EB third preference categories for all countries except China, India, and Mexico leapt ahead by 6½ months, and the Other Workers category for all nations except India and Mexico saw a big jump ahead of almost 10 months after stagnating almost the entire fiscal year.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In prior years, the September Visa Bulletin has sometimes been the harbinger of bad news, often showing that the government had run out of immigrant visa numbers due to unpredicted demands.  This year, almost all categories show continued momentum from the prior months:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;The EB-2 preference category for China and India moved forward more than 2 months, to 05/08/2006, evidence of the government making use of all EB-2 immigrant visa numbers left unused by other countries.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;In the EB-3 preference category, Chinese nationals saw a move forward of 1 month, to 10/22/2003.  The priority dates for nationals of all other countries except China, India, and Mexico jumped to 12/15/2004, a move of 6½ months.  Indian nationals remained at the same cutoff date, and numbers for Mexico are still unavailable.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;After moving almost 1 full year in the last Visa Bulletin, this month sees the EB-3 Other Workers category moving ahead almost 10 months for all countries except India and Mexico, to 03/22/2003.  Indian nationals remained at the same cutoff date, and numbers for Mexico are still unavailable.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A look back at the U.S. Department of State’s final predictions in July reveals that they were more than successful in reaching their goals:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;EB-2 for India and China:&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;BETTER&lt;/strong&gt; than predicted cutoff date of March or April 2006&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;EB-3 Worldwide:&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;BETTER&lt;/strong&gt; than predicted cutoff date of June through September 2004&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;EB-3 China:&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;SAME&lt;/strong&gt; as predicted cutoff date of October through December 2003&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;EB-3 India:&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;WORSE&lt;/strong&gt; than predicted cutoff date of February 2002&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;EB-3 Philippines:&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;BETTER &lt;/strong&gt;than originally predicted cutoff date of June through September 2004&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Since most categories progressed further than predicted, this hopefully indicates that the government has made full usage of all employment-based immigrant visa numbers this fiscal year.  Any shortage or overage will not be known until at least a few months from now.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fiscal Year 2010 was a good year for some nationals, and not so good for others.  Those in EB-2 classification certainly felt the benefits; the government has clearly improved its handling of such cases.  On the other hand, foreign nationals from Mexico were surprised by the news that all visa numbers had run out for that country very early on in the year.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It is hard to know what to expect for Fiscal Year 2011.  The October Visa Bulletin may show slower movement forward or even some retrogression (i.e., the backwards movement of priority dates) as the quotas resume to the normal “per country” basis and India and China no longer have access to the numbers left unused by other countries in the EB-2 category.  Hopefully, some of the good ideas we have seen introduced this year – such as the quarterly progress updates – will help to make the Visa Bulletin an even more useful tool in 2011 &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Employment-Based Visa Bulletin for September 2010&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;img width="462" height="407" align="left" alt="" src="/Portals/16/media/1September vb.JPG" /&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Legend&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;C = current as there is no waiting period necessary to file the I-485&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;U = unavailable as visa supply has been exhausted for the remainder of fiscal year, or legislation creating the category has expired&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Date indicated = cut-off date that indicates a backlog; if the priority date (date the labor certification or I-140 was filed, depending on the type of case) is &lt;em&gt;BEFORE&lt;/em&gt; date listed, the I-485 can be filed&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Employment-based Preferences&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;First&lt;/em&gt;: Priority Workers&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;Second&lt;/em&gt;:  Members of the Professions Holding Advanced Degrees or Persons of Exceptional Ability&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;Third&lt;/em&gt;:  Skilled Workers, Professionals, and Other Workers&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;Fourth&lt;/em&gt;:  Certain Special Immigrants&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;Fifth&lt;/em&gt;:  Employment Creation&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By: Emily C. &lt;br /&gt;
Photo attribution: &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/secret_canadian"&gt;http://www.flickr.com/photos/secret_canadian&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=/blog/EntryId/181/September-2010-Visa-Bulletin.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="tags"&gt;Tags: US Immigration Updates&lt;/div&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/181/September-2010-Visa-Bulletin.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">/blog/EntryId/181/September-2010-Visa-Bulletin.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 17:36:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=181</trackback:ping>
      <blog:tag blog:url="http://www.visanow.com/blog/TagID/133.aspx">US Immigration Updates</blog:tag>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>H-1B Cap Count as of 8/27/2010</title>
      <link>/blog/EntryId/180/H-1B-Cap-Count-as-of-8-27-2010.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img width="240" height="180" align="left" alt="" src="/Portals/16/media/exclaimation mark.jpg" /&gt;The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) released H-1B cap numbers as of 8/27, receiving &lt;strong&gt;34,900&lt;/strong&gt; toward the 65,000 cap-subject H-1B petitions and &lt;strong&gt;13,000&lt;/strong&gt; towards the 20,000 H-1B Master's category.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thus, H-1B cap numbers remain available, and there is still time to submit your FY2011 H-1B visa application for foreign national applicants beginning employment on October 1, 2010 or later.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Contact your immigration services provider to see if this is an option for you/your foreign national or learn more about &lt;a target="_new" href="http://immigration.visanow.com/form_H-1B-Best-Practices/"&gt;best practices for preparing your FY2011 H-1B application&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Photo attribution: http://www.flickr.com/photos/8042373@N03/&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=/blog/EntryId/180/H-1B-Cap-Count-as-of-8-27-2010.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="tags"&gt;Tags: US Immigration Updates&lt;/div&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/180/H-1B-Cap-Count-as-of-8-27-2010.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">/blog/EntryId/180/H-1B-Cap-Count-as-of-8-27-2010.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 17:35:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=180</trackback:ping>
      <blog:tag blog:url="http://www.visanow.com/blog/TagID/133.aspx">US Immigration Updates</blog:tag>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New ESTA Fee for Visa Waiver Program Effective 9/8/2010 </title>
      <link>/blog/EntryId/179/New-ESTA-Fee-for-Visa-Waiver-Program-Effective-9-8-2010.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;img height="160" border="0" align="left" width="240" src="/Portals/16/media/plane landing.jpg" alt="etsa" /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Effective September 8, 2010, foreign nationals visiting the United States under the Visa Waiver Program (VWP) will be required to pay a fee of $14 once they submit an application for travel approval through the Electronic System for Travel Authorization (ESTA). The U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) declared this interim final rule in order to stimulate tourism to the United States and cover processing fees. $10 of the fee funds U.S. tourism marketing efforts and the remaining $4 covers administrative expenses. The new ESTA fee applies to all 36 countries under the VWP. Individuals that received ESTA authorization before September 8 are not required to pay the fee until their authorization expires.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ESTA is an automated web-based system used to determine the preliminary eligibility of visitors that travel to the United States under the VWP. ESTA applications may be submitted at any time prior to travel, and is valid for two years or until a foreign national acquires a new passport, whichever occurs first. An ESTA authorization allows a foreign national to enter the country multiple times during the duration of the authorization.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Photo attribution: http://www.flickr.com/photos/76936665@N00/&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=/blog/EntryId/179/New-ESTA-Fee-for-Visa-Waiver-Program-Effective-9-8-2010.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="tags"&gt;Tags: US Immigration Updates&lt;/div&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/179/New-ESTA-Fee-for-Visa-Waiver-Program-Effective-9-8-2010.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">/blog/EntryId/179/New-ESTA-Fee-for-Visa-Waiver-Program-Effective-9-8-2010.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 17:34:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=179</trackback:ping>
      <blog:tag blog:url="http://www.visanow.com/blog/TagID/133.aspx">US Immigration Updates</blog:tag>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>USCIS Proposes First-Ever Standardized Fee Waiver Form (public feedback ends 9/13)</title>
      <link>/blog/EntryId/178/USCIS-Proposes-First-Ever-Standardized-Fee-Waiver-Form-public-feedback-ends-9-13.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img width="240" height="121" align="left" alt="" src="/Portals/16/media/fee waiver.jpg" /&gt;U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services has proposed the Form I-912 or a request for an individual fee waiver. The standardized fee waiver form is the first of its kind and is intended to provide relief to individuals that are financially unable to seek immigration benefits. The Form I-912 was published in response to public concern and confusion over the criteria to file for a fee waiver. USCIS collaborated with stakeholders and the public while developing this form. Now they are requesting feedback and comments on the Form I-912 from the public until September 13, 2010.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Form highlights include:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;The form will standardize the fee waiver request process and bring consistency to it by providing clear criteria to the applicant.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;The form proposes clear-cut documentation and evidentiary requirements. “For example if an applicant can show that he/she has received a means-tested benefit in the last 6 months and has evidence to document this claim, he/she does not need to submit further evidence.”&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;The form explains which application types are eligible for a fee waiver request.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Only one Form I-912 is required to be filed for both the basic filing fee and biometrics fee associated with that application.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;USCIS officers will be informed on how to review the form after the Office of Management and Budget approves it.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Previously the USCIS determined those who were financially unable to pay immigration fees by submitting and signing an affidavit. This is a signed and dated unsworn declaration that includes reasons as to why the applicant is unable to pay the filing fees. An applicant was previously not required, but could include documentation to prove his or her financial situation. Types of documentation that could be presented were proof of living arrangements, Mortgage payment receipts, utility bills etc. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is unclear what the new criteria will be because the Form I-912 has not yet been approved. However, the &lt;a title="public can comment on the Form I-912" target="_blank" href="http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480b1965b"&gt;public can comment on the Form I-912&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Photo attribution: &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/krcla/"&gt;http://www.flickr.com/photos/krcla/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=/blog/EntryId/178/USCIS-Proposes-First-Ever-Standardized-Fee-Waiver-Form-public-feedback-ends-9-13.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="tags"&gt;Tags: US Immigration Updates&lt;/div&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/178/USCIS-Proposes-First-Ever-Standardized-Fee-Waiver-Form-public-feedback-ends-9-13.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">/blog/EntryId/178/USCIS-Proposes-First-Ever-Standardized-Fee-Waiver-Form-public-feedback-ends-9-13.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 17:33:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=178</trackback:ping>
      <blog:tag blog:url="http://www.visanow.com/blog/TagID/133.aspx">US Immigration Updates</blog:tag>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>8/24 Webcast: Increased H-1B/L-1 Fraud Fees - What it Means and Your Options</title>
      <link>/blog/EntryId/177/8-24-Webcast-Increased-H-1B-L-1-Fraud-Fees-What-it-Means-and-Your-Options.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;img border="0" align="left" src="/Portals/16/media/webcast.jpg" alt="webcast immigration" /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class="labelText" id="lblEventDesc"&gt;President Obama recently approved emergency funding worth $600 million to enhance the security along the Southwest border, which will be funded by increased H-1B and L-1 visa fees. Specifically, H.R. 6080 requires employers with 50+ employees and more than 50% of their U.S.-based work force on H-1B or L-1 visas to pay approximately $2,000 more per visa application in fraud prevention and detection fees. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An attorney will review the latest happenings, explain who is affected, and cover strategies on how to lower your H-1B/L-1 headcount and/or decrease the number of H-1B renewals needed in the long term during VISANOW’s webcast on August 24th at 11 a.m. CT (30 minute duration).&lt;/span&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class="labelText" id="lblEventTitle"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Increased H-1B/L-1 Fraud Prevention and Detection Fees: What it Means and Your Options&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;Tuesday, August 24, 2010&lt;br /&gt;
11:00 a.m. CT &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="https://www119.livemeeting.com/lrs/8000072451/Registration.aspx?pageName=nn0257tgp317xzh3" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;img border="0" align="left" src="http://immigration.visanow.com/Portals/72907/images/registernobutton.jpg" alt="immigration webcast Register now" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Who should attend?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/strong&gt;Anybody who is, or will be, involved in hiring and employing foreign nationals. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Photo attribution: &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/njum/"&gt;http://www.flickr.com/photos/njum/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=/blog/EntryId/177/8-24-Webcast-Increased-H-1B-L-1-Fraud-Fees-What-it-Means-and-Your-Options.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="tags"&gt;Tags: Corporate Immigration Best Practices&lt;/div&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/177/8-24-Webcast-Increased-H-1B-L-1-Fraud-Fees-What-it-Means-and-Your-Options.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">/blog/EntryId/177/8-24-Webcast-Increased-H-1B-L-1-Fraud-Fees-What-it-Means-and-Your-Options.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 17:32:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=177</trackback:ping>
      <blog:tag blog:url="http://www.visanow.com/blog/TagID/137.aspx">Corporate Immigration Best Practices</blog:tag>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New Guidelines on Employment and Business Visas in India</title>
      <link>/blog/EntryId/176/New-Guidelines-on-Employment-and-Business-Visas-in-India.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img border="0" alt="india immigration" hspace="3" vspace="3" style="float: left;" src="/Portals/16/media/india.jpg" /&gt;The Indian government has issued new guidelines in regards to the application and eligibility for employment and business visas. The new criteria outlines the eligibility, quota, salary level and validity period for &lt;a title="employment and business visas" target="_blank" href="http://immigration.visanow.com/blog/bid/34735/Business-Versus-Work-Visas-in-India"&gt;employment and business visas&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;VISANOW is closely monitoring the implementation of these new guidelines. Please contact VISANOW or your immigration services provider for any questions. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Employment Visa&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Information Technology Services&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Foreign national requirements for this sector are not affected by the new guidelines.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;No limit on the number of employed foreign nationals.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Salary of foreign national must be more than $25,000 per year.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Non IT-Sectors&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Limit on the number of highly skilled foreign nationals a company can sponsor is 1% of their total staff or a maximum of 20 foreign nationals, whichever is less.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;If 1% of a company’s total staff is less than 5, the company can sponsor up to a maximum of 5 foreign nationals.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;A minimum salary cap is not specified.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Must receive approval from Ministry of Labour and Employment if the number exceeds the required limit.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;An employment visa may be issued for a preliminary period of up to 2 years, one year longer than the previous timeframe, and can be extended in-country to a maximum period of 5 years from the original date of issuance.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Business Visa&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;May be issued up to a maximum period of 5 years for most countries while US nationals can be approved for a maximum validity of 10 years.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;All business visa holders are granted admission to India for up to six months per stay.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;If the validity is less than 5 years than can be extended in India for a maximum period of 5 years from the original date of issuance by FRRO’s/FRO’s/State. However, the visiting foreign business associate’s gross sales or turnover in India must equal or surpass approximately $216,000 per year.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;The total duration for Governments/Union Territories is 5 years from the initial date of issuance.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;First extensions must be granted by Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA).&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Business visas will now clearly identify the applicable terms of stay, including if holders are required upon arrival to register with the proper authorities.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Photo attribution: &lt;span&gt;http&lt;/span&gt;://&lt;span&gt;www&lt;/span&gt;.&lt;span&gt;flickr&lt;/span&gt;.com/photos/&lt;span&gt;meanestindian&lt;/span&gt;/&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=/blog/EntryId/176/New-Guidelines-on-Employment-and-Business-Visas-in-India.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="tags"&gt;Tags: International Immigration Updates&lt;/div&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/176/New-Guidelines-on-Employment-and-Business-Visas-in-India.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">/blog/EntryId/176/New-Guidelines-on-Employment-and-Business-Visas-in-India.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 17:31:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=176</trackback:ping>
      <blog:tag blog:url="http://www.visanow.com/blog/TagID/134.aspx">International Immigration Updates</blog:tag>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Increased H-1B/L-1 Fees to Fund Border Security Enhancements </title>
      <link>/blog/EntryId/175/Increased-H-1B-L-1-Fees-to-Fund-Border-Security-Enhancements.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img border="0" alt="new immigration fees" hspace="3" vspace="3" style="float: left;" src="/Portals/16/media/exclaimation mark.jpg" /&gt;Last week, President Obama approved emergency funding worth $600 million to increase security along the Southwest border including 1,500 additional border agents and enhanced new technology. The legislation will not impact the federal budget, but will be funded by increased H-1B and L-1 visa fees.&lt;strong&gt; Specifically, the legislation will require employers with 50+ employees and more than 50% of their U.S.-based work force on H-1B or L-1 visas to pay approximately $2,000 more per visa application&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;strong&gt;in fraud prevention and detection fees. &lt;/strong&gt;While the language of the bill states that it goes into effect “immediately” and expires September 30, 2014, the USCIS website has not been updated to reflect change in filing fees as of yet.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you employ more than 50 employees in the U.S. and more than 50% of your U.S. employees hold L or H-1B status, contact your immigration services provider to understand potential options to either lower your H-1B/L-1 headcount and/or decrease the number of H-1B renewals needed in the long term. If your employee or H-1B/L-1 count do not fall under these regulations, your H-1B and L-1 filing fees will remain the same. For additional questions, to learn how the fee increase may affect you, and strategies of how to handle, &lt;a title="register for VISANOW&amp;rsquo;s free webcast on August 24 at 11 a.m. CT" target="_blank" href="https://www119.livemeeting.com/lrs/8000072451/Registration.aspx?pageName=nn0257tgp317xzh3"&gt;register for VISANOW’s free webcast on August 24 at 11 a.m. CT&lt;/a&gt; (30 minute duration) or contact your immigration services provider.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The emergency funding bill has received mixed reactions. Some U.S. politicians are praising the bill while Indian companies, who sponsor approximately 12% of H-1Bs each year, are frustrated over its impact. Specifically Wipro, Tata Consultancy Services, Infosys Technologies, and Mahindra Satyam all feel that the visa fee increases will negatively affect their businesses. Further, some Indian firms are already thinking that the increased costs will get passed on to customers. The new fraud fees for H-1Bs ($2,500) and L-1s ($2,750), is likely to cost Indian firms an additional $200 million a year.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The legislation began in the Senate and was approved immediately before the summer recess. However, the bill was required to be approved by the House of Representatives first, because of its revenue-generating nature. Therefore, both the House of Representatives and Senate interrupted a six-week recess in order to pass the emergency funding bill. The House approved the bill first and the Senate scheduled a special session, passing the bill with unanimous consent. Then, the bill was approved and signed into law last week by President Obama. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Photo attribution: &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/8042373@N03/"&gt;http://www.flickr.com/photos/8042373@N03/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=/blog/EntryId/175/Increased-H-1B-L-1-Fees-to-Fund-Border-Security-Enhancements.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/175/Increased-H-1B-L-1-Fees-to-Fund-Border-Security-Enhancements.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">/blog/EntryId/175/Increased-H-1B-L-1-Fees-to-Fund-Border-Security-Enhancements.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 17:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=175</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Rejuventating the DREAM Act</title>
      <link>/blog/EntryId/174/Rejuventating-the-DREAM-Act.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img width="240" height="180" align="left" alt="" src="/Portals/16/media/Dreamact.jpg" /&gt;Back in the early 80's the Supreme Court (Plyler v. Doe) ruled in favor of allowing undocumented students the right to attend school up to the 12&lt;sup&gt;th&lt;/sup&gt; grade. What about after 12&lt;sup&gt;th&lt;/sup&gt; grade you ask? This is where the DREAM act comes into play. The DREAM Act stands for &lt;strong&gt;Development, Relief and Education for Alien Minors Enforcement&lt;/strong&gt;. The DREAM Act was first introduced to the U.S. Senate and the House of Representatives on March 26, 2009, and thereafter several forms of the bill have been reintroduced.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Recently, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has made it clear that when Comprehensive Immigration Reform (CIR) advocates advise him that CIR is dead for the year, he will begin to push the DREAM Act as a standalone initiative, separate from CIR. Reid told reporters that he plans to push immigration reform legislation this fall in a comprehensive way, and that if there is not support for a broader package, he would “take a real strong look at the DREAM Act” as a standalone piece of legislation. If enacted, the DREAM Act would provide undocumented immigrant students with an opportunity to receive conditional residency, but also would be an important stepping stone towards comprehensive immigration reform.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As of 2009, the DREAM act beneficiaries &lt;span style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;must&lt;/span&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Have proof of arriving in the US before age 16&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Have proof of residence in the US for at least 5 consecutive years since their date of arrival&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Be between the ages of 15 and 35 at the time of bill enactment &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Have graduated from an American High school or obtained a GED&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Be of good moral character&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;No criminal record or conviction of any drug related crimes&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;No danger or threat to national security&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If an undocumented student has proof of all the above, they can then apply for conditional residency, granting the individual a 6 year period to legally live in the United States. Within that 6 year period of time an immigrant with “conditional” status &lt;span style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;must&lt;/span&gt; then accomplish one of the following:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Graduate from a 2 year college&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Complete at least 2 years toward a 4 year degree&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Serve 2 years in the US military&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Upon completing one of the three options in the 6 year time frame, an undocumented immigrant can then apply for legal permanent resident status to become a U.S. citizen. If a beneficiary does not meet these requirements they will be subject to deportation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It is estimated that only between 5 and 10 percent of undocumented high-school graduates go to college. In most cases, it is not because the student does not desire to further their education but because they either cannot afford tuition or that certain schools will not let them enroll. Almost 40% of undocumented children live in households below the poverty line, meaning that they cannot afford to go to college and as undocumented citizens they are not able to receive financial aid in the form of grants. The incentive for these children to even graduate high school is diminishing, leaving many undocumented students with high drop-out rates and potential for them to be involved in gangs and other legal activities.  With an estimated 65,000 undocumented students graduating high school a year, this is a growing concern for our nation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There are many benefits to the DREAM act aside from giving hard-working kids an independent way to accomplish legal citizenship. The DREAM act gives determined immigrants the opportunity to increase their standard of living. With an estimated 70 million baby boomers beginning to retire, the beneficiaries of the DREAM act will be able to fill the growing need for high skilled workers. In having a steady income these beneficiaries can invest in the U.S. economy and help save American taxpayers money. The DREAM act keeps talented students in the U.S. Paving a path for these motivated students to excel in their chosen field and fully integrate in the United States Is a win-win situation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Photo attribution:&lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/dreamactivistorg/"&gt;http://www.flickr.com/photos/dreamactivistorg/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=/blog/EntryId/174/Rejuventating-the-DREAM-Act.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="tags"&gt;Tags: US Immigration Reform&lt;/div&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/174/Rejuventating-the-DREAM-Act.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">/blog/EntryId/174/Rejuventating-the-DREAM-Act.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 17:22:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=174</trackback:ping>
      <blog:tag blog:url="http://www.visanow.com/blog/TagID/135.aspx">US Immigration Reform</blog:tag>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Florida Looking to go “One Step Further” than Arizona's SB 1070 </title>
      <link>/blog/EntryId/173/Florida-Looking-to-go-One-Step-Further-than-Arizonas-SB-1070.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img width="240" height="180" align="left" alt="" src="/Portals/16/media/FL.jpg" /&gt;As Arizona’s SB 1070 battle continues, Florida is looking to throw its hat into the ring with a bill modeled after Arizona’s that goes one step beyond. On Wednesday, August 11 Florida Attorney General Bill McCollum, current Republican candidate for governor, unveiled a proposal he hopes “will provide new enforcement tools for protecting our citizens and will help our state fight the ongoing problems created by illegal immigration”.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Similar to Arizona’s law, the proposed bill 1) requires law officials to check the status of a suspected illegal immigrant during a lawful stop, 2) requires immigrants to carry documentation of their valid status, facing a misdemeanor if they fail to do so that could result in up to 20 days in jail for the first offense, 3) and makes it a misdemeanor for an illegal alien to seek a job. In addition, the proposed law goes beyond Arizona’s SB 1070 by allowing judges to specifically consider a defendant’s immigration status when setting his/her bond and also give judges the ability to give out harsher sentences to illegal immigrants who commit crimes in Florida.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;State Rep. William Snyder, the chairman of the House Criminal and Civil Justice Policy Council, drafted the proposed bill with McCollum. McCollum states that he believes this proposed bill will avoid the pit falls of the Arizona law by making some changes to the draft legislation after sections of the Arizona bill were blocked by Judge Susan Bolton on July 29. Specifically, he has said his bill would succeed where Arizona failed by defining what constitutes a “reasonable suspicion” of illegal status during a lawful stop.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Though merely in the preliminary stages of legislation, this bill takes the controversial sections of Arizona’s SB 1070 and adds its own provisions that would be sure to stir the pot in a state that is heavily populated with both legal and illegal immigrants. In a study done in 2007 by the Center for Immigration Studies, Florida was said to be made up of 19.1% of legal immigrants and 6% illegal immigrants, ranking among the top 5 for illegal immigrant population with California, Nevada, Texas, and Arizona. Such a bill would have far reaching implications for a significant portion of Florida’s population and is sure to attract a legal battle similar to Arizona’s if successfully passed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Photo attribution: &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/bamcat/"&gt;http://www.flickr.com/photos/bamcat/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=/blog/EntryId/173/Florida-Looking-to-go-One-Step-Further-than-Arizonas-SB-1070.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="tags"&gt;Tags: US Immigration Reform&lt;/div&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/173/Florida-Looking-to-go-One-Step-Further-than-Arizonas-SB-1070.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">/blog/EntryId/173/Florida-Looking-to-go-One-Step-Further-than-Arizonas-SB-1070.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 17:18:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=173</trackback:ping>
      <blog:tag blog:url="http://www.visanow.com/blog/TagID/135.aspx">US Immigration Reform</blog:tag>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>USCIS Enhances its Website to Improve Customer Service </title>
      <link>/blog/EntryId/171/USCIS-Enhances-its-Website-to-Improve-Customer-Service.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;img border="0" vspace="3" alt="describe the image" style="float: left;" src="/Portals/16/media/laoptop_bigpresh.jpg" /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The USCIS updated and improved their current website in order to improve customer service and satisfaction. The new website contains web features designed to expand access to a user’s case information. Some of the enhancements include a new web-based inquiry tool and personalized case status information. In addition, USCIS now offers features geared toward Spanish-speaking customers on USCIS.gov/espanol.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The USCIS has also made a commitment to respond within 15 days of receiving the electronic inquiry, instead of the previous timeframe of 30 days. Over time the USCIS expects to improve the online inquiry tool to include even more form types.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; USCIS Website Enhancements include:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Online Inquiry Tool for Select Forms: Customers are now able to submit an online inquiry to request a status update if their Application to Replace Permanent Resident Card (Form I-90) or Application for Naturalization (Form N-400) has exceeded the posted processing time.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;When viewing the status of a case online, the process steps are specific to the petition or application a customer has submitted. The website now includes customized process steps for more than 40 form types.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Customers have the option to receive email notifications in Spanish&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Users can submit a Change of Address online in Spanish&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Photo attribution: &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/bigpresh/"&gt;http://www.flickr.com/photos/bigpresh/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=/blog/EntryId/171/USCIS-Enhances-its-Website-to-Improve-Customer-Service.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="tags"&gt;Tags: US Immigration Updates&lt;/div&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/171/USCIS-Enhances-its-Website-to-Improve-Customer-Service.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">/blog/EntryId/171/USCIS-Enhances-its-Website-to-Improve-Customer-Service.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 17:17:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=171</trackback:ping>
      <blog:tag blog:url="http://www.visanow.com/blog/TagID/133.aspx">US Immigration Updates</blog:tag>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Virginia Looks to Be Next in Line After Arizona</title>
      <link>/blog/EntryId/170/Virginia-Looks-to-Be-Next-in-Line-After-Arizona.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img width="240" height="160" align="left" alt="" src="/Portals/16/media/Virginia.jpg" /&gt;Tempers continue to flare across the U.S. as states look for the federal government to address the illegal immigration issue.  On Monday, August 2, 2010 Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli published a legal opinion allowing law officials to check the immigration status of any person stopped for any reason.  Before this new opinion, such a right to check status was permitted after arrest only.  As Attorney General Cuccinelli must publish opinions at the request of law makers, and this legal opinion came at the request of Republican Virginia Delegate Robert Marshall. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This move from Virginia comes right after federal &lt;a href="http://immigration.visanow.com/blog/bid/44156/Restricted-Arizona-Law-SB-1070-Goes-Into-Effect-Today"&gt;Judge Susan Bolton blocked&lt;/a&gt; similar sections of the Arizona immigration law (SB1070) on July 28, specifically the provision requiring police officers to "make a reasonable attempt to determine the immigration status of a person stopped, detained or arrested" if the officer had reasonable suspicion of the person’s status.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cuccinelli, however, distinguishes his opinion from the Arizona provision saying that his legal opinion gives the authority to local officials to check for status but does not &lt;span style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;require&lt;/span&gt; them to do so.  He maintains that this opinion concerns issues of settled law and does “not break any new legal ground”.  A legal opinion does not carry the weight of a new law, but acts as a way to clarify laws already in effect.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This carries on the country wide divide and debate over the authority of the state versus the federal government concerning immigration matters.  Are states and local authorities allowed to participate in immigration enforcement?  If so, to what extent are they allowed? States remain frustrated with the lack of enforcement on the federal level and look to find answers for themselves.  However, if this trend continues the country will be left with a pathwork of 50 differing immigration policies all with different means of enforcing them, something the Obama administration is trying to avoid. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One alternative the federal government has offered is program 287g, an agreement with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) that trains local officials in immigration enforcement.  This would allow local officials to carry out some of the duties of an immigration agent, under ICE supervision.  Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell has been in talks with federal officials for the past few months seeking to implement program 287g.  An agreement has yet to be reached, but any updates will be announced in the coming weeks.  If an agreement goes through, Virginia would join Alabama, Arizona, Colorado, Georgia, Florida, Minnesota, Rhode Island and Tennessee in using program 287g.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Photo attribution: &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/jstephenconn/"&gt;http://www.flickr.com/photos/jstephenconn/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=/blog/EntryId/170/Virginia-Looks-to-Be-Next-in-Line-After-Arizona.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="tags"&gt;Tags: US Immigration Reform&lt;/div&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/170/Virginia-Looks-to-Be-Next-in-Line-After-Arizona.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">/blog/EntryId/170/Virginia-Looks-to-Be-Next-in-Line-After-Arizona.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 17:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=170</trackback:ping>
      <blog:tag blog:url="http://www.visanow.com/blog/TagID/135.aspx">US Immigration Reform</blog:tag>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Comprehensive Immigration Reform Progress at a Standstill  </title>
      <link>/blog/EntryId/169/Comprehensive-Immigration-Reform-Progress-at-a-Standstill.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img border="0" alt="CIR" hspace="3" vspace="3" style="float: left;" src="/Portals/16/media/statue of liberty.jpg" /&gt; Illegal immigration and enforcement has come into the national limelight with &lt;a title="Arizona&amp;rsquo;s controversial SB 1070 bill taking effect" target="_blank" href="http://immigration.visanow.com/blog/bid/44156/Restricted-Arizona-Law-SB-1070-Goes-Into-Effect-Today"&gt;Arizona’s controversial SB 1070 bill taking effect&lt;/a&gt;, the nine me-too states/cities trying to adopt similar legislation, and the multitude of lawsuits meant to halt it. We believed the spotlight on Arizona’s “ill-conceived” immigration law would help the CIR cause by amplifying the pressure on Congress, however the “next 30 days” timeframe for action that I quoted back in April has long come and gone and CIR is in the same place today as it was a few months ago. Even with a milestone speech from President Obama, actual progress towards comprehensive immigration reform (CIR) is stagnant.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div&gt; &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Although the SB 1070 was severely weakened with Judge Bolton blocking the most controversial parts of the law, we fully expect Gov. Jan Brewer to counteract. Without a doubt the case will reach the Supreme Court, and the battle is long from being over. Ultimately, halting SB 1070 will reclaim the Federal jurisdiction over immigration enforcement, but it is useless to reaffirm this responsibility if the Federal government does not take steps necessary to fix the broken immigration system.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Early in July, &lt;a title="President Obama gave his first speech in office dedicated to immigration" target="_blank" href="http://immigration.visanow.com/blog/bid/42825/Obama-Makes-the-Case-for-Immigration-Reform"&gt;President Obama gave his first speech in office dedicated to immigration&lt;/a&gt;. We all applauded his gallant effort to rally the nation for immigration reform and his Presidential commitment to CIR. But in reality his speech did not do much or have much effect. Obama’s speech did not provide new information, timelines or plans of action for CIR. Nor has it inspired additional bipartisan support, which is now more than ever so critical with the loss of Senator Lindsey Graham’s support.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Summer is almost over and election season will soon begin; thus the timeframe for immigration reform is diminishing. Before the November elections, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid may abandon comprehensive immigration reform and take the piece meal approach by trying to pass the Dream Act, only a fractional part of overall reform, albeit an important one, effecting undocumented students. Post-November, Democrats insist they won’t try to take up immigration reform or move major legislation during the subsequent lame-duck session. On the contrary, the lame-duck session may be the only and best time to pass CIR. Still, to echo previous assessments, we believe CIR won't realistically be debated until January 2011. Any later than the first quarter of 2011, will risk cross over into 2011 campaigning for presidential re-elections, and relegate CIR to the backburner or completely off the table for another Congressional session. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By: Bob M.&lt;br /&gt;
Photo attribution: http://www.flickr.com/photos/davidprior/&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=/blog/EntryId/169/Comprehensive-Immigration-Reform-Progress-at-a-Standstill.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="tags"&gt;Tags: US Immigration Reform&lt;/div&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/169/Comprehensive-Immigration-Reform-Progress-at-a-Standstill.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">/blog/EntryId/169/Comprehensive-Immigration-Reform-Progress-at-a-Standstill.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 17:13:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=169</trackback:ping>
      <blog:tag blog:url="http://www.visanow.com/blog/TagID/135.aspx">US Immigration Reform</blog:tag>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Restricted Arizona Law (SB 1070) Goes Into Effect Today</title>
      <link>/blog/EntryId/168/Restricted-Arizona-Law-SB-1070-Goes-Into-Effect-Today.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;img height="240" border="0" align="left" width="171" alt="arizona border" src="/Portals/16/media/arizona-border.jpg" /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Today, &lt;a title="Arizona’s controversial SB1070 immigration law goes into effect" target="_blank" href="http://immigration.visanow.com/blog/bid/38957/Arizona-Takes-Immigration-Reform-into-its-own-Hands"&gt;Arizona’s controversial SB1070 immigration law goes into effect&lt;/a&gt; after U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton temporarily restricted significant portions from going through. On Wednesday, July 28, Judge Bolton granted a temporary injunction on the most fought over sections. Judge Bolton blocked 1) the section calling police officers to check someone’s immigration status while performing their regular duties 2) the section requiring immigrants to carry papers at all times 3) the section permitting police officers to detain people who were arrested until their immigration status was determined 4) the section restricting illegal immigration from seeking work in public places, and 5) the section allowing warrantless arrests for suspected illegal immigrants.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Although substantially weakened due to the blocked provisions currently in place, parts of the law will go into effect today.  Among the new provisions under SB 1070 states that it is illegal in Arizona to transport day laborers across the state or to give transportation to an illegal immigrant.  Also, under SB 1070 the vehicle used to help an illegal immigrant can be impounded.  Further, it is also illegal for cities to disregard federal immigration laws under SB 1070.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Judge Bolton’s decision comes after three hearings over two weeks with constant demonstrations happening outside the courthouse, and applies to the seven different law suits SB 1070 attracted. The judge ruled against the major aspects of the law, because she believed law enforcement would have to question every detainee about their immigration status, placing an immense burden on federal agencies to provide confirmation. In other words, Arizona’s immigration law will redirect federal resources and move agencies away from other priorities they have set. Furthermore, the law would have a negative impact and “increase the intrusion of police presence into the lives of legally present aliens (and even United States citizens)…” By taking action to block essential components of SB 1070, Judge Bolton may have shown her opinion and indicated that the federal government is likely to win this case in the end.  After yesterday’s ruling, the Justice Department issued a statement saying the court ‘ruled correctly’.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Arizona’s Gov. Jan Brewer remains committed to SB 1070, and has several options: get Judge Bolton to reopen the case after more complete fact finding is done by her legal team or move the to the court of appeals (and ultimately to the Supreme court). This fight is really far from over. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Photo attribution: http://www.flickr.com/photos/threadedthoughts/&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=/blog/EntryId/168/Restricted-Arizona-Law-SB-1070-Goes-Into-Effect-Today.aspx&gt;More ...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="tags"&gt;Tags: US Immigration Reform&lt;/div&gt;</description>
      <author />
      <comments>http://www.visanow.com/blog/EntryId/168/Restricted-Arizona-Law-SB-1070-Goes-Into-Effect-Today.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">/blog/EntryId/168/Restricted-Arizona-Law-SB-1070-Goes-Into-Effect-Today.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 17:11:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.visanow.comDesktopModules/BlogTrackback.aspx?id=168</trackback:ping>
      <blog:tag blog:url="http://www.visanow.com/blog/TagID/135.aspx">US Immigration Reform</blog:tag>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New Consular Fee Schedule from the DOS</title>
      <link>/blog/EntryId/167/New-Consular-Fee-Schedule-from-the-DOS.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;img height="159" border="0" align="left" width="240" vspace="3" alt="DOS increases fees" src="/Portals/16/media/dos.jpg" /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Department of State (DOS) issued a new &lt;a href="http://travel.state.gov/news/news_5078.html"&gt;fee schedule&lt;/a&gt; this month that shows a general increase for consular services including passports services and immigrant visas. The new consular fee schedule comes after an in-depth study conducted by the Department of State, which showed that the current fees did not cover the full cost of services provided at U.S. consulates.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Effective July 13, if you are applying for an immigrant visas and/or obtaining a new passport at a U.S. consulate abroad you should be aware of these new costs and plan accordingly. If you have any questions or concerns about the new consular fees, please contact your immigration services provider.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Highlights of the new consular fee schedule include:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Non-immigrant visas*: the processing fee K and E visas have significantly increased from $131 to $350 and $390, respectively&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Immigrant visas: the processing fees for employment-based visas have more than doubled&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Passport fees: there are now fees for additional passport pages and renouncing your U.S. citizenship, both used to be free of charge, will now cost $82 and $450, respectively&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In their cost analysis, the DOS worked with a team of consultants and consular posts to determine costs and required resources within the consular immigration process by reviewing and accounting for the following:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;All activities that are required to produce passports, immigration visas and consular services&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;All resources consumed (costs) in the course of producing passports, immigration visas and consular services&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;The quantity of resources consumed by passports, immigration visas and consular services&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;The frequency and intensity of demand placed on activities to produce passports, immigration visas and consular services  &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;*The fee increase for nonimmigrant visas went into effect on June 4.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Photo attribution: &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos
