Learn more about I-9 and H-1B compliance.
New Chapter Published:
Streamline Immigration & Increase ROI White Paper
Discover the 10 best practices that challenge the traditions
and myths surrounding immigration law/legal services,
which will streamline your current immigration process:
- Chapter 1: Pick the
right provider and manage the relationship for success
- Chapter 2: Use the
right technology in structuring an efficient immigration
process
- Chapter 3: Lower and
control your cost
- Chapter 4: Define and
frequently review your corporate immigration policy
- Chapter 5: Map the
immigration process steps to educate stakeholders
Taking a deeper look into
the immigration process, Chapter 5 will help you map
the phases of the general immigration process and build
process maps for your most frequently filed visas to gain a
better understanding of responsibility, dependencies and
timing involved. A fundamental understanding of the process
will help you converse more effectively with involved
stakeholders (sponsorship candidate/foreign national, hiring
manager, recruiters, etc.) and appropriately manage their
expectations
Download the white paper now.
Return to top
U.S. Immigration News
800 Slots
Remain for FY2010 H-1B Cap
As of December 15, 2009, the U.S. Citizenship and
Immigration Services (USCIS) has received 64,200 cap-subject
H-1B petitions towards the fiscal year 2010 cap. After many
months with flat demand, H-1B visa filings have recently
spiked since October. Also, the FY2010 H-1B1 cap remains
open and an option for Chilean and Singaporeans citizens who
may miss the regular H-1B cap.
If the demand keeps trending, the H-1B cap for the 2010
fiscal year will be met soon! Thus, employers should plan
accordingly to file H-1B petitions for their cap-subject
foreign national employees as quickly as possible. Contact
your immigration services provider ASAP to see if this is an
option for you or your foreign national, before the cap is
met.
USCIS indicated that there was an increase in H-1B petitions
received recently, including approximately 2,000 petitions
received in the days before Thanksgiving. While the advanced
degree (Master’s) cap has been filed, there are
approximately 800 slots remaining in the “regular” H-1B
quota. The USCIS will continue to accept petitions filed on
behalf of foreign nationals who previously have not held
H-1B status, and any H-1B applicants with an advanced degree
will continue to be counted toward the general 65,000 H-1B
cap.
Further, the H-1B1 is available for nationals of Chile and
Singapore. The statutory limit of 6,800 has not been reached
for FY2010, and is not expected to be reached, so it remains
an alternative option for Chileans and Singaporeans who miss
the regular H-1B cap.
Return to top
DOS Announces Worldwide Deployment of Form DS-160
Most foreign nationals entering or re-entering the United
States in valid nonimmigrant status (H-1B, L-1B, L-2/H-4,
B-1, B-2, F-1 etc.) are required to possess a valid
nonimmigrant visa stamp in the passport to facilitate entry
or re-entry into the U.S. To obtain a valid nonimmigrant
visa passport stamp, foreign nationals must apply for the
stamp at United States consulates abroad. This process
requires an in-person appointment at the consulate prior to
visa issuance, and additional visa application forms that
vary depending on the type of visa being requested. The new
DS-160 (Nonimmigrant Visa Electronic Application Form)
combines and replaces multiple forms that used to be in
place. Worldwide deployment of the new DS-160 form has
begun, and the Department of State’s (DOS) goal is to
replace current nonimmigrant application forms with the new
DS-160 by April 30, 2010.
While DS-160 was meant to streamline consular processing,
the online form is even longer than its predecessors and the
online interface is not entirely intuitive. If your foreign
nationals submit their own consular processing forms,
contact your immigration services provider to inquire about
consular processing services to ensure a smooth transition
if required to use the new Form DS-160.
On April 29, 2008, the Department of State’s Bureau of
Consular Affairs (BCA) published a final rule, establishing
the new Form DS-160, Nonimmigrant Visa Electronic
Application Form, a fully integrated online application form
that will be used to collect the necessary application
information from persons seeking a nonimmigrant visa. The
purpose of Form DS-160 is to improve visa processing by
combining several of the current DS application forms such
as DS-156, DS-157, DS-158, etc., into one form that can be
submitted electronically. Consular Officers will use the
information entered on the Form DS-160 to process the visa
application and, combined with a personal interview, will
determine an applicant’s eligibility for a nonimmigrant
visa. The new form contains all of the options for visa
applications in one form, which eliminates confusion when
deciding which forms are necessary. The form will allow
Consular Officers to review nonimmigrant visa application
data before the applicant physically appears for interview,
thus making the application process more efficient. It is
important to note, however, that the new application does
not minimize the requirement to provide proof of all
economic and social ties outside the United States.
The new DS-160, Nonimmigrant Visa Electronic Application, is
currently being used at the following U.S. Embassy/Consulate
locations:
-
Australia; Melbourne,
Perth, and Sydney
-
Bermuda; Hamilton
-
Canada; Montreal and
Vancouver
-
Hong Kong
-
Ireland; Dublin
-
Libya; Tripoli
-
Mexico; Ciudad Juarez,
Hermosillo, Matamoros, Monterrey, Nogales, Nuevo Laredo,
and Tijuana
-
Montenegro; Podgorica
-
Russia; Moscow, St.
Petersburg, Vladivostok
Return to top
January 2010 Visa Bulletin & Priority Date
Explanation
Priority dates will finally begin to move
forward again as we head into the second quarter of
Fiscal Year 2010. Even more significantly, the U.S.
Department of State (DOS) offered detailed insight
into recent Visa Bulletin trends, and provided
projections for the movement of priority dates for
the rest of the fiscal year.
The January Visa Bulletin shows forward movement for
virtually all employment preference categories:
- The priority date for
Chinese nationals in the EB second category moved from
April 1, 2005, to May 1, 2005.
- For the fourth visa
bulletin in a row, the priority date for Indian
nationals in the EB second category remained at January
22, 2005, while the priority date for the EB third
(skilled workers, professionals, and other workers)
category moved forward, this time by almost two months
to June 22, 2001.
- Priority dates for
all other nationals in the EB third category except
Mexicans moved two months ahead, from June 1, 2002, to
August 1, 2002. The cut-off date for Mexican nationals
moved ahead one month, to July 1, 2002.
- The priority date for
Indian nationals in the EB third category (other
workers) also moved to June 1, 2001, which is a return
to the same cut-off date as other countries.
While it was encouraging
to finally see the healthy progress of this month’s priority
dates, even more important was the DOS’ explanation
regarding how projections are made for the selection of
priority dates, and its predictions of employment-based
immigrant visa number usage for the remainder of FY2010.
The mechanism of determining priority dates is generally
already known. If the number of visa numbers available in a
given preference category exceed the number of
“documentarily qualified applicants,” that category is
considered “current.” However, where the number of
applicants exceeds the availability of visa numbers in a
certain month, a cut-off priority date must be established
in order to ensure that only those with the oldest priority
dates are processed.
For example, the DOS explains, if the monthly visa number
target for the EB third category is 3,000, but there are
8,000 “documentarily qualified applicants,” then a cut-off
date must be set. That cut-off date is equivalent to the
priority date of the 3,001st applicant.
The DOS does not fully explain what a “documentarily
qualified applicant” is, but does confirm that the reason
demand fluctuates is because not every applicant with a
priority date earlier than the established cut-off is ready
for “final visa action.” Also, each passing month brings new
immigrant visa applicants at both the consular posts and the
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (“CIS”). Because
of these and “other variables,” the number of qualified
total applicants can change each month.
The DOS also goes on to explain how it allots the
per-country quotas for the 226,000 family-based immigrant
visas and the 140,000 employment-based immigrant visas
available each fiscal year. The limit is statutorily set at
7% of the total of 366,000, i.e., 25,620 per country. The
number of visas issued to any single country cannot exceed
this figure; this helps to avoid monopolization of visa
numbers by applicants from only a few countries.
The DOS explained that priority dates progressed slowly in
the Visa Bulletins for October and November 2009 because of
excessive demand after so many categories were “unavailable”
for a number of months towards the end of FY 2009. However,
the DOS noted that the CIS has begun to process cases to
completion more efficiently, which contributed to the
forward momentum seen in this month’s Visa Bulletin.
Because of this momentum, the DOS has predicted that the EB
first preference category will not have cutoff dates
assigned anytime this fiscal year. There had been some
discussion of the possibility that increased demand by
Chinese and Indian nationals might cause retrogression.
The DOS further confirmed that the status quo would remain
in place for the EB second category. Demand by China and
India may still cause the category to become unavailable if
the limit is reached before the end of the fiscal year, as
happened last fiscal year. However, the DOS confirms that it
has and will apply a special provision of the Immigration
and Nationality Act (section 202(a)(5)) that would allow
unused numbers in other employment-based visa categories to
be used for Chinese and Indian applicants in the EB second
preference category. Whenever this happens, the priority
dates for all countries should theoretically be the same,
since immigrant visa numbers must be assigned strictly in
order of priority date. In other words, an Indian or Chinese
national should not receive a green card under section
202(a)(5) before another foreign national whose application
is ready for final action, so long as the other foreign
national’s priority date is earlier.
Finally, the DOS gave its final predictions for FY 2010,
which are “best case scenarios” that are “based on current
indications of demand:”
EB Second
- China: July to
October 2005 (5 months’ progress from the January 2010
Visa Bulletin)
- India: February to
early March 2005 (+1.5 months)
(If section 202(a)(5) were
to apply, both categories might move to somewhere between
October through December 2005 (+7 months for China; +10
months for India)
EB Third
- Worldwide: April
through August 2005 (+3 years)
- China: June through
September 2003 (+1 year)
- India: January
through February 2002 (+8 months)
- Mexico: January
through June 2004 (+2 years)
- Philippines: April
through August 2005 (+3 years)
The DOS of course does not
guarantee that the priority dates will actually progress to
these points by the end of the fiscal year, as progress is
always subject to fluctuations in demand. It is always
possible for the per-country and overall visa number limits
to be reached before the end of year. However, the DOS’
insights are exceptionally useful, especially for those
foreign nationals who know that they must wait many years to
finally receive their green cards.
Employment-Based Visa Bulletin for
January 2010
|
Employment-Based |
All Other Countries |
China (mainland born) |
India |
Mexico |
Philippines |
|
1st |
C |
C |
C |
C |
C |
|
2nd |
C |
05/01/2005 |
01/22/2005 |
C |
C |
|
3rd |
08/01/2002
|
08/01/2002 |
06/22/2001 |
07/01/2002 |
08/01/2002 |
|
Other Workers |
06/01/2001 |
06/01/2001 |
06/01/2001 |
06/01/2001 |
06/01/2001 |
|
4th |
C |
C |
C |
C |
C |
|
Certain Religious
Workers |
C |
C |
C |
C |
C |
|
5th |
C |
C |
C |
C |
C |
|
Targeted Employment
Areas/Regional Centers |
C |
C |
C |
C |
C |
|
5th Pilot Programs |
C |
C |
C |
C |
C |
Legend
- C = current as there
is no waiting period necessary to file the I-485
- U = unavailable as
visa supply has been exhausted for the remainder of
fiscal year, or legislation creating the category has
expired
- Date indicated =
cut-off date that indicates a backlog; if the priority
date (date the labor certification or I-140 was filed,
depending on the type of case) is BEFORE date listed,
the I-485 can be filed
Employment-based
Preferences
- First: Priority
Workers
- Second: Members of
the Professions Holding Advanced Degrees or Persons of
Exceptional Ability
- Third: Skilled
Workers, Professionals, and Other Workers
- Fourth: Certain
Special Immigrants
- Fifth: Employment
Creation
Return to top
International Immigration News
Common Misconceptions: U.S. Citizens & Global Immigration
There are many misconceptions about global immigration when
employing U.S. citizens abroad. Many of these misconceptions
arise from not having a clear understanding of rules and
regulations. For example, we are often asked if U.S.
citizens are able to legally work in other countries as long
as its under 90 days or if U.S. citizens need a work permit
for Canada.
You should be aware of these common misconceptions, and we
suggest conducting a self-evaluation of your current
processes to ensure immigration compliance. Consult your
immigration services provider for additional guidance.
Top global immigration misconceptions include:
US citizens can work
anywhere in the world without a work permit (or at least up
to 90 days)
While many countries allow U.S. citizens to travel to a
country without a visa for up to 90 days, this does not mean
they can work. If U.S. citizen is going to be working in a
foreign country, the must secure the proper work
authorization.
U.S. citizens do not
need a work permit for Canada
The North America Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) does allow for
U.S. citizens a shortened immigration process. Under the
normal Canadian Immigration process, an employer would have
to submit a labor market opinion (LMO) to the Human
Resources and Social Development Canada office. Under NAFTA,
U.S. citizens still require a work permit to work in Canada,
however they are allowed to bypass the LMO process. U.S.
citizens who qualify under NAFTA are those traveling for
business visit, professionals, intra-company transferees,
and traders and investors.
U.S. citizens can work
without work permit in countries the U.S. has visa waiver
agreements with by leaving every 90 days and re-entering
Visa waivers are set up with certain conditions, but do not
allow U.S. citizens to work without proper work permits.
U.S. citizens working
on a short trip (i.e. a week) only need a business visa and
not a work permit
U.S. citizens can travel on business to most countries, but
regardless of duration U.S. citizens need a work permit to
conduct work.
U.S. citizens with a previous work permit only need a
business visa to re-enter the same country
Unless a previously granted work permit is still valid, a
U.S. citizen will need a new work permit upon re-entering
the same country.
Return to
top
Three Balkan Countries Added to EU’s Schengen Visa
As of December 19, citizens with biometric passports from
the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Montenegro and
Serbia will be able to travel throughout the EU’s “Schengen
Area. Tourist or business visitor travel will be visa-exempt
within the now 28 Schengen countries for a maximum stay of
up to 90 cumulative days over a six-month period. However,
if these Balkan citizens will be working within the Schengen
Area, they will still need to apply for work permits under
the particular host country’s national immigration laws.
These changes are important to note for any of your Balkan
foreign nationals, as they will no longer need business
visas within the Schengen countries, but will still require
work permits. Contact your immigration services provider
with any Schengen Visa inquiries.
Return to
top